Determinants and clinical impact of pressure drift in manoscan anorectal high resolution manometry system

G. Parthasarathy, J. McMaster, K. Feuerhak, A. R. Zinsmeister, Adil Eddie Bharucha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Pressure drift (PD), resulting from differences between room and body temperature, reduces the accuracy of pressure measurements with the Manoscan high resolution manometry (HRM) system. Our aims were to assess PD during anorectal HRM. Methods: Defined as the residual pressure measured immediately after the catheter was removed, PD was calculated for each sensor and averaged across all 12 sensors in 454 anorectal consecutive studies recorded with 3 HRM catheters. The relationship between PD and study duration, number of prior uses of a catheter, and peak and average pressure exposure during a study were evaluated. The correction of PD with a software algorithm (thermal compensation) was evaluated in 76 studies where the most distal sensor was outside the body. Key Results: The PD varied among sensors and across catheters. The average PD (7.3 ± 0.2 mmHg) was significantly greater for newer catheters, during longer studies, or when sensors were exposed to higher pressures. Together, these factors explained 81% of the variance in overall PD. After thermal compensation, the uncorrected median PD for the most distal sensor was 2.5-5 mmHg over the study duration. Correcting this changed the interpretation (e.g., as abnormal instead of normal) of at least 1 anorectal parameter in eight of 76 studies. Conclusions & Inferences: During anorectal HRM, PD declines with catheter use and is greater for newer catheters, when sensors are exposed to higher pressures, and for studies of longer duration. While PD is partially corrected with thermal compensation algorithms, the impact on interpretation is modest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNeurogastroenterology and Motility
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Manometry
Pressure
Catheters
Hot Temperature
Body Temperature

Keywords

  • Anorectal manometry
  • Constipation
  • Fecal incontinence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
  • Gastroenterology
  • Physiology

Cite this

Determinants and clinical impact of pressure drift in manoscan anorectal high resolution manometry system. / Parthasarathy, G.; McMaster, J.; Feuerhak, K.; Zinsmeister, A. R.; Bharucha, Adil Eddie.

In: Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f901148dbaaf474bbaae71df59486e52,
title = "Determinants and clinical impact of pressure drift in manoscan anorectal high resolution manometry system",
abstract = "Background: Pressure drift (PD), resulting from differences between room and body temperature, reduces the accuracy of pressure measurements with the Manoscan high resolution manometry (HRM) system. Our aims were to assess PD during anorectal HRM. Methods: Defined as the residual pressure measured immediately after the catheter was removed, PD was calculated for each sensor and averaged across all 12 sensors in 454 anorectal consecutive studies recorded with 3 HRM catheters. The relationship between PD and study duration, number of prior uses of a catheter, and peak and average pressure exposure during a study were evaluated. The correction of PD with a software algorithm (thermal compensation) was evaluated in 76 studies where the most distal sensor was outside the body. Key Results: The PD varied among sensors and across catheters. The average PD (7.3 ± 0.2 mmHg) was significantly greater for newer catheters, during longer studies, or when sensors were exposed to higher pressures. Together, these factors explained 81{\%} of the variance in overall PD. After thermal compensation, the uncorrected median PD for the most distal sensor was 2.5-5 mmHg over the study duration. Correcting this changed the interpretation (e.g., as abnormal instead of normal) of at least 1 anorectal parameter in eight of 76 studies. Conclusions & Inferences: During anorectal HRM, PD declines with catheter use and is greater for newer catheters, when sensors are exposed to higher pressures, and for studies of longer duration. While PD is partially corrected with thermal compensation algorithms, the impact on interpretation is modest.",
keywords = "Anorectal manometry, Constipation, Fecal incontinence",
author = "G. Parthasarathy and J. McMaster and K. Feuerhak and Zinsmeister, {A. R.} and Bharucha, {Adil Eddie}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/nmo.12830",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Neurogastroenterology and Motility",
issn = "1350-1925",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants and clinical impact of pressure drift in manoscan anorectal high resolution manometry system

AU - Parthasarathy, G.

AU - McMaster, J.

AU - Feuerhak, K.

AU - Zinsmeister, A. R.

AU - Bharucha, Adil Eddie

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: Pressure drift (PD), resulting from differences between room and body temperature, reduces the accuracy of pressure measurements with the Manoscan high resolution manometry (HRM) system. Our aims were to assess PD during anorectal HRM. Methods: Defined as the residual pressure measured immediately after the catheter was removed, PD was calculated for each sensor and averaged across all 12 sensors in 454 anorectal consecutive studies recorded with 3 HRM catheters. The relationship between PD and study duration, number of prior uses of a catheter, and peak and average pressure exposure during a study were evaluated. The correction of PD with a software algorithm (thermal compensation) was evaluated in 76 studies where the most distal sensor was outside the body. Key Results: The PD varied among sensors and across catheters. The average PD (7.3 ± 0.2 mmHg) was significantly greater for newer catheters, during longer studies, or when sensors were exposed to higher pressures. Together, these factors explained 81% of the variance in overall PD. After thermal compensation, the uncorrected median PD for the most distal sensor was 2.5-5 mmHg over the study duration. Correcting this changed the interpretation (e.g., as abnormal instead of normal) of at least 1 anorectal parameter in eight of 76 studies. Conclusions & Inferences: During anorectal HRM, PD declines with catheter use and is greater for newer catheters, when sensors are exposed to higher pressures, and for studies of longer duration. While PD is partially corrected with thermal compensation algorithms, the impact on interpretation is modest.

AB - Background: Pressure drift (PD), resulting from differences between room and body temperature, reduces the accuracy of pressure measurements with the Manoscan high resolution manometry (HRM) system. Our aims were to assess PD during anorectal HRM. Methods: Defined as the residual pressure measured immediately after the catheter was removed, PD was calculated for each sensor and averaged across all 12 sensors in 454 anorectal consecutive studies recorded with 3 HRM catheters. The relationship between PD and study duration, number of prior uses of a catheter, and peak and average pressure exposure during a study were evaluated. The correction of PD with a software algorithm (thermal compensation) was evaluated in 76 studies where the most distal sensor was outside the body. Key Results: The PD varied among sensors and across catheters. The average PD (7.3 ± 0.2 mmHg) was significantly greater for newer catheters, during longer studies, or when sensors were exposed to higher pressures. Together, these factors explained 81% of the variance in overall PD. After thermal compensation, the uncorrected median PD for the most distal sensor was 2.5-5 mmHg over the study duration. Correcting this changed the interpretation (e.g., as abnormal instead of normal) of at least 1 anorectal parameter in eight of 76 studies. Conclusions & Inferences: During anorectal HRM, PD declines with catheter use and is greater for newer catheters, when sensors are exposed to higher pressures, and for studies of longer duration. While PD is partially corrected with thermal compensation algorithms, the impact on interpretation is modest.

KW - Anorectal manometry

KW - Constipation

KW - Fecal incontinence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963865158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963865158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/nmo.12830

DO - 10.1111/nmo.12830

M3 - Article

C2 - 27061208

AN - SCOPUS:84983509036

JO - Neurogastroenterology and Motility

JF - Neurogastroenterology and Motility

SN - 1350-1925

ER -