Detection of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Neovascularization Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Runqing Huang, Sahar S. Abdelmoneim, Caroline A. Ball, Lara F. Nhola, Ann M. Farrell, Steven Feinstein, Sharon L. Mulvagh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Intraplaque neovascularization is considered an important indicator of plaque vulnerability. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of carotid arteries improves imaging of carotid intima-media thickness and permits real-time visualization of neovascularization of the atherosclerotic plaque. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of CEUS-detected carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Methods: A systematic search was performed to identify studies published in the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from 2004 to June 2015. Studies evaluating the accuracy of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis (visual interpretation) for the diagnosis of intraplaque neovascularization compared with histologic specimens and/or clinical diagnosis of symptomatic plaque were included. Parameters evaluated were plaque quantitative CEUS intensity and the visual grading of plaque CEUS. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the likelihood ratios (LRs), diagnostic odds ratios, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves. Corresponding areas under the curves were calculated. Results: The literature search identified 203 studies, 20 of which were selected for systematic review; the final meta-analysis included seven studies. For qualitative CEUS, pooled sensitivity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87), pooled specificity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), the pooled positive LR was 3.22 (95% CI, 1.67-6.18), the pooled negative LR was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.09-0.64), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 15.57 (95% CI, 4.94-49.03), and area under the curve was 0.894. For quantitative CEUS, pooled sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.83), pooled specificity was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73), the pooled positive LR was 2.34 (95% CI, 1.69-3.23), the pooled negative LR was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.25-0.47), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 7.06 (95% CI, 3.6-13.82), and area under the curve was 0.888. Conclusions: CEUS is a promising noninvasive diagnostic modality for detecting intraplaque neovascularization. Standardization of quantitative analysis and visual grading classification is needed to increase reliability and reduce technical heterogeneity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Atherosclerotic Plaques
Area Under Curve
Meta-Analysis
Odds Ratio
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness
Carotid Arteries
MEDLINE
ROC Curve
Databases

Keywords

  • Carotid atherosclerotic plaque
  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
  • Neovascularization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Detection of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Neovascularization Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. / Huang, Runqing; Abdelmoneim, Sahar S.; Ball, Caroline A.; Nhola, Lara F.; Farrell, Ann M.; Feinstein, Steven; Mulvagh, Sharon L.

In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huang, Runqing ; Abdelmoneim, Sahar S. ; Ball, Caroline A. ; Nhola, Lara F. ; Farrell, Ann M. ; Feinstein, Steven ; Mulvagh, Sharon L. / Detection of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Neovascularization Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2016.
@article{5b80197af3f148a89bf87f1bc0352f82,
title = "Detection of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Neovascularization Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies",
abstract = "Background: Intraplaque neovascularization is considered an important indicator of plaque vulnerability. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of carotid arteries improves imaging of carotid intima-media thickness and permits real-time visualization of neovascularization of the atherosclerotic plaque. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of CEUS-detected carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Methods: A systematic search was performed to identify studies published in the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from 2004 to June 2015. Studies evaluating the accuracy of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis (visual interpretation) for the diagnosis of intraplaque neovascularization compared with histologic specimens and/or clinical diagnosis of symptomatic plaque were included. Parameters evaluated were plaque quantitative CEUS intensity and the visual grading of plaque CEUS. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the likelihood ratios (LRs), diagnostic odds ratios, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves. Corresponding areas under the curves were calculated. Results: The literature search identified 203 studies, 20 of which were selected for systematic review; the final meta-analysis included seven studies. For qualitative CEUS, pooled sensitivity was 0.80 (95{\%} CI, 0.72-0.87), pooled specificity was 0.83 (95{\%} CI, 0.76-0.89), the pooled positive LR was 3.22 (95{\%} CI, 1.67-6.18), the pooled negative LR was 0.24 (95{\%} CI, 0.09-0.64), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 15.57 (95{\%} CI, 4.94-49.03), and area under the curve was 0.894. For quantitative CEUS, pooled sensitivity was 0.77 (95{\%} CI, 0.71-0.83), pooled specificity was 0.68 (95{\%} CI, 0.62-0.73), the pooled positive LR was 2.34 (95{\%} CI, 1.69-3.23), the pooled negative LR was 0.34 (95{\%} CI, 0.25-0.47), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 7.06 (95{\%} CI, 3.6-13.82), and area under the curve was 0.888. Conclusions: CEUS is a promising noninvasive diagnostic modality for detecting intraplaque neovascularization. Standardization of quantitative analysis and visual grading classification is needed to increase reliability and reduce technical heterogeneity.",
keywords = "Carotid atherosclerotic plaque, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Neovascularization",
author = "Runqing Huang and Abdelmoneim, {Sahar S.} and Ball, {Caroline A.} and Nhola, {Lara F.} and Farrell, {Ann M.} and Steven Feinstein and Mulvagh, {Sharon L.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.echo.2016.02.012",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
issn = "0894-7317",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Neovascularization Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound

T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

AU - Huang, Runqing

AU - Abdelmoneim, Sahar S.

AU - Ball, Caroline A.

AU - Nhola, Lara F.

AU - Farrell, Ann M.

AU - Feinstein, Steven

AU - Mulvagh, Sharon L.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: Intraplaque neovascularization is considered an important indicator of plaque vulnerability. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of carotid arteries improves imaging of carotid intima-media thickness and permits real-time visualization of neovascularization of the atherosclerotic plaque. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of CEUS-detected carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Methods: A systematic search was performed to identify studies published in the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from 2004 to June 2015. Studies evaluating the accuracy of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis (visual interpretation) for the diagnosis of intraplaque neovascularization compared with histologic specimens and/or clinical diagnosis of symptomatic plaque were included. Parameters evaluated were plaque quantitative CEUS intensity and the visual grading of plaque CEUS. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the likelihood ratios (LRs), diagnostic odds ratios, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves. Corresponding areas under the curves were calculated. Results: The literature search identified 203 studies, 20 of which were selected for systematic review; the final meta-analysis included seven studies. For qualitative CEUS, pooled sensitivity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87), pooled specificity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), the pooled positive LR was 3.22 (95% CI, 1.67-6.18), the pooled negative LR was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.09-0.64), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 15.57 (95% CI, 4.94-49.03), and area under the curve was 0.894. For quantitative CEUS, pooled sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.83), pooled specificity was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73), the pooled positive LR was 2.34 (95% CI, 1.69-3.23), the pooled negative LR was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.25-0.47), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 7.06 (95% CI, 3.6-13.82), and area under the curve was 0.888. Conclusions: CEUS is a promising noninvasive diagnostic modality for detecting intraplaque neovascularization. Standardization of quantitative analysis and visual grading classification is needed to increase reliability and reduce technical heterogeneity.

AB - Background: Intraplaque neovascularization is considered an important indicator of plaque vulnerability. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of carotid arteries improves imaging of carotid intima-media thickness and permits real-time visualization of neovascularization of the atherosclerotic plaque. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of CEUS-detected carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Methods: A systematic search was performed to identify studies published in the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from 2004 to June 2015. Studies evaluating the accuracy of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis (visual interpretation) for the diagnosis of intraplaque neovascularization compared with histologic specimens and/or clinical diagnosis of symptomatic plaque were included. Parameters evaluated were plaque quantitative CEUS intensity and the visual grading of plaque CEUS. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the likelihood ratios (LRs), diagnostic odds ratios, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves. Corresponding areas under the curves were calculated. Results: The literature search identified 203 studies, 20 of which were selected for systematic review; the final meta-analysis included seven studies. For qualitative CEUS, pooled sensitivity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87), pooled specificity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), the pooled positive LR was 3.22 (95% CI, 1.67-6.18), the pooled negative LR was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.09-0.64), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 15.57 (95% CI, 4.94-49.03), and area under the curve was 0.894. For quantitative CEUS, pooled sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.83), pooled specificity was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73), the pooled positive LR was 2.34 (95% CI, 1.69-3.23), the pooled negative LR was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.25-0.47), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 7.06 (95% CI, 3.6-13.82), and area under the curve was 0.888. Conclusions: CEUS is a promising noninvasive diagnostic modality for detecting intraplaque neovascularization. Standardization of quantitative analysis and visual grading classification is needed to increase reliability and reduce technical heterogeneity.

KW - Carotid atherosclerotic plaque

KW - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound

KW - Neovascularization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962077761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962077761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2016.02.012

DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2016.02.012

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

SN - 0894-7317

ER -