Design, implementation, and evaluation of an intervention to improve referral to smoking cessation services in breast cancer patients

Margaret Nolan, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Karthik Ghosh, David Martin, David Oman Warner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Smoking is a risk factor for poor outcomes following breast reconstructive surgery. This project aimed to design and implement an intervention to consistently refer all breast cancer patients to tobacco treatment services. Methods: In formative work, a set of processes for providers to consistently refer patients to a tobacco treatment specialist at the Nicotine Dependence Center (NDC) was designed. Elements included consistent documentation of smoking status, provider advice specific to the benefits of quitting to cancer care, referral to NDC using an “opt-out” strategy that emphasized smoking cessation as a standard part of breast cancer treatment, and reinforcement of the importance of the referral by multiple personnel. The number of referrals to the NDC and number of patients who attended their scheduled NDC appointment were measured before and 1 year after implementation. Qualitative evaluation was performed using semi-structured interviews with participating providers and patients regarding acceptability. Results: The proportion of smoking patients referred to the NDC increased from 29% (22/75) before the intervention to 74% (20/27) afterward. Among those referred, attendance at the consultation increased from 41% (9/22) to 75% (15/20). This occurred despite provider interviews revealing knowledge gaps about the referral process and evidence of provider adaptation to accommodate personal practice. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were high. Conclusion: These findings suggest that similar referral interventions for all cancer patients should be pursued with the aim of embedding tobacco dependence treatment seamlessly and consistently into the cancer treatment plan of every patient who smokes cigarettes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Tobacco Use Disorder
Smoking Cessation
Referral and Consultation
Breast Neoplasms
Smoking
Tobacco
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Interviews
Therapeutics
Neoplasms
Smoke
Tobacco Products
Documentation
Appointments and Schedules
Breast

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Health services research
  • Quality improvement
  • Standards of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Cite this

@article{fb124f1a718645b48b4c554e6a33b02a,
title = "Design, implementation, and evaluation of an intervention to improve referral to smoking cessation services in breast cancer patients",
abstract = "Purpose: Smoking is a risk factor for poor outcomes following breast reconstructive surgery. This project aimed to design and implement an intervention to consistently refer all breast cancer patients to tobacco treatment services. Methods: In formative work, a set of processes for providers to consistently refer patients to a tobacco treatment specialist at the Nicotine Dependence Center (NDC) was designed. Elements included consistent documentation of smoking status, provider advice specific to the benefits of quitting to cancer care, referral to NDC using an “opt-out” strategy that emphasized smoking cessation as a standard part of breast cancer treatment, and reinforcement of the importance of the referral by multiple personnel. The number of referrals to the NDC and number of patients who attended their scheduled NDC appointment were measured before and 1 year after implementation. Qualitative evaluation was performed using semi-structured interviews with participating providers and patients regarding acceptability. Results: The proportion of smoking patients referred to the NDC increased from 29{\%} (22/75) before the intervention to 74{\%} (20/27) afterward. Among those referred, attendance at the consultation increased from 41{\%} (9/22) to 75{\%} (15/20). This occurred despite provider interviews revealing knowledge gaps about the referral process and evidence of provider adaptation to accommodate personal practice. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were high. Conclusion: These findings suggest that similar referral interventions for all cancer patients should be pursued with the aim of embedding tobacco dependence treatment seamlessly and consistently into the cancer treatment plan of every patient who smokes cigarettes.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Health services research, Quality improvement, Standards of care",
author = "Margaret Nolan and Ridgeway, {Jennifer L.} and Karthik Ghosh and David Martin and Warner, {David Oman}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00520-018-4486-5",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
issn = "0941-4355",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design, implementation, and evaluation of an intervention to improve referral to smoking cessation services in breast cancer patients

AU - Nolan, Margaret

AU - Ridgeway, Jennifer L.

AU - Ghosh, Karthik

AU - Martin, David

AU - Warner, David Oman

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Smoking is a risk factor for poor outcomes following breast reconstructive surgery. This project aimed to design and implement an intervention to consistently refer all breast cancer patients to tobacco treatment services. Methods: In formative work, a set of processes for providers to consistently refer patients to a tobacco treatment specialist at the Nicotine Dependence Center (NDC) was designed. Elements included consistent documentation of smoking status, provider advice specific to the benefits of quitting to cancer care, referral to NDC using an “opt-out” strategy that emphasized smoking cessation as a standard part of breast cancer treatment, and reinforcement of the importance of the referral by multiple personnel. The number of referrals to the NDC and number of patients who attended their scheduled NDC appointment were measured before and 1 year after implementation. Qualitative evaluation was performed using semi-structured interviews with participating providers and patients regarding acceptability. Results: The proportion of smoking patients referred to the NDC increased from 29% (22/75) before the intervention to 74% (20/27) afterward. Among those referred, attendance at the consultation increased from 41% (9/22) to 75% (15/20). This occurred despite provider interviews revealing knowledge gaps about the referral process and evidence of provider adaptation to accommodate personal practice. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were high. Conclusion: These findings suggest that similar referral interventions for all cancer patients should be pursued with the aim of embedding tobacco dependence treatment seamlessly and consistently into the cancer treatment plan of every patient who smokes cigarettes.

AB - Purpose: Smoking is a risk factor for poor outcomes following breast reconstructive surgery. This project aimed to design and implement an intervention to consistently refer all breast cancer patients to tobacco treatment services. Methods: In formative work, a set of processes for providers to consistently refer patients to a tobacco treatment specialist at the Nicotine Dependence Center (NDC) was designed. Elements included consistent documentation of smoking status, provider advice specific to the benefits of quitting to cancer care, referral to NDC using an “opt-out” strategy that emphasized smoking cessation as a standard part of breast cancer treatment, and reinforcement of the importance of the referral by multiple personnel. The number of referrals to the NDC and number of patients who attended their scheduled NDC appointment were measured before and 1 year after implementation. Qualitative evaluation was performed using semi-structured interviews with participating providers and patients regarding acceptability. Results: The proportion of smoking patients referred to the NDC increased from 29% (22/75) before the intervention to 74% (20/27) afterward. Among those referred, attendance at the consultation increased from 41% (9/22) to 75% (15/20). This occurred despite provider interviews revealing knowledge gaps about the referral process and evidence of provider adaptation to accommodate personal practice. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were high. Conclusion: These findings suggest that similar referral interventions for all cancer patients should be pursued with the aim of embedding tobacco dependence treatment seamlessly and consistently into the cancer treatment plan of every patient who smokes cigarettes.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Health services research

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Standards of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054500265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054500265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-018-4486-5

DO - 10.1007/s00520-018-4486-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 30284040

AN - SCOPUS:85054500265

JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

SN - 0941-4355

ER -