TY - JOUR
T1 - Dependence of Water-equivalent Diameter and Size-specific Dose Estimates on CT Tube Potential
AU - McCollough, Cynthia H.
AU - McCollough, Shannon L.
AU - Schneider, Justine J.
AU - Moen, Taylor R.
AU - Weaver, Jayse M.
AU - Vrieze, Thomas J.
AU - Yu, Lifeng
AU - Leng, Shuai
N1 - Funding Information:
Study supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 EB017095). C.H.M. is the recipient of a grant from Siemens Healthcare unrelated to this study.. Conflicts of interest are listed at the end of this article. See also the editorial by Boone in this issue.
Funding Information:
The authors thank the Mayo Clinic Radiology Research Publication Support Team for assistance in editing the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2022
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Background: The size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) is a patient-focused CT dose metric. However, published size-dependent conversion factors (fsize) used to calculate SSDE were determined primarily by using phantoms; only eight to 15 patient data sets were used, all at 120 kV. Purpose: To determine the effect of different tube potentials on the water-equivalent diameter (WED) and SSDE for patient CT scans of the head, chest, and abdomen. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used 250 noncontrast CT scans acquired between March 2013 and June 2017. Bony structures were segmented, and their CT numbers were modified to reflect bone attenuation at 70, 90, 110, 130, and 150 kV. Soft-tissue CT numbers were unchanged because of negligible energy dependence. fsize was measured in anthropomorphic phantoms for each tube potential and fit to an exponential function. WED and SSDE were determined for each patient at all tube potentials, regression analysis was performed relative to the WED and SSDE at 120 kV, and mean differences relative to 120 kV were calculated. Results: In 250 patients (median age, 21.5 years; interquartile range, 44 years; 130 women), WED for all tube potentials was linearly related to the WED at 120 kV in all body regions (R2 = 0.995-1.000). The effect of tube potential on WED was negligible for torso examinations (Cohen d, 0.05). In the head, a medium effect size was observed at 70 kV; however, the mean absolute difference in WED was small (20.49 cm 6 0.08 [standard deviation]; P < .001). For commonly used combinations of tube potential and patient size, the mean differences in SSDE at alternative tube potentials relative to SSDE at 120 kV were less than 5%. Conclusion: At noncontrast CT, published size-dependent conversion factors accurately determined size-specific dose estimates on 250 patient scans at five tube potentials other than 120 kV.
AB - Background: The size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) is a patient-focused CT dose metric. However, published size-dependent conversion factors (fsize) used to calculate SSDE were determined primarily by using phantoms; only eight to 15 patient data sets were used, all at 120 kV. Purpose: To determine the effect of different tube potentials on the water-equivalent diameter (WED) and SSDE for patient CT scans of the head, chest, and abdomen. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used 250 noncontrast CT scans acquired between March 2013 and June 2017. Bony structures were segmented, and their CT numbers were modified to reflect bone attenuation at 70, 90, 110, 130, and 150 kV. Soft-tissue CT numbers were unchanged because of negligible energy dependence. fsize was measured in anthropomorphic phantoms for each tube potential and fit to an exponential function. WED and SSDE were determined for each patient at all tube potentials, regression analysis was performed relative to the WED and SSDE at 120 kV, and mean differences relative to 120 kV were calculated. Results: In 250 patients (median age, 21.5 years; interquartile range, 44 years; 130 women), WED for all tube potentials was linearly related to the WED at 120 kV in all body regions (R2 = 0.995-1.000). The effect of tube potential on WED was negligible for torso examinations (Cohen d, 0.05). In the head, a medium effect size was observed at 70 kV; however, the mean absolute difference in WED was small (20.49 cm 6 0.08 [standard deviation]; P < .001). For commonly used combinations of tube potential and patient size, the mean differences in SSDE at alternative tube potentials relative to SSDE at 120 kV were less than 5%. Conclusion: At noncontrast CT, published size-dependent conversion factors accurately determined size-specific dose estimates on 250 patient scans at five tube potentials other than 120 kV.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129778495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129778495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/RADIOL.210860
DO - 10.1148/RADIOL.210860
M3 - Article
C2 - 35040673
AN - SCOPUS:85129778495
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 303
SP - 404
EP - 411
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 2
ER -