Dense deposit disease: Clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients

Samih H. Nasr, Anthony M. Valeri, Gerald B. Appel, Julius Sherwinter, Michael B. Stokes, Samar M. Said, Glen S. Markowitz, Vivette D. D'Agati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

117 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objectives: Dense deposit disease (DDD) is a rare disorder that most commonly affects children. This study reports the largest North American series addressing clinicopathologic and outcome differences in children and adults. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Thirty-two patients with DDD were analyzed from the archives of Columbia University between 1977 and 2007. Characteristic intramembranous electron-dense deposits defined all diagnoses. Results: The cohort included 14 children (<16 yr) and 18 adults, with 39% of adults >60 yr. The female/male ratio was 1.9. At presentation, the mean 24-h urine protein was 4.6 g, nephrotic syndrome was present in 33%, renal insufficiency in 59%, and hematuria in 87% of patients. Compared with adults, children had lower incidence of renal insufficiency and were more likely to have reduced C3. Histologic pattern included membranoproliferative, mesangial, endocapillary, and crescentic glomerulonephritis. Treatment included immunosuppression (IS) alone in seven, renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockade alone in six, and combined IS/RAS blockade in 11. On follow-up (mean 63 mo) available in 27 patients, 26% had complete response, 48% had persistent renal dysfunction, and 26% had ESRD. Correlates of ESRD were older age and higher creatinine at biopsy, the absence of combined IS/RAS blockade therapy and the presence of subepithelial humps, but not histologic pattern. On multivariate analysis, age and creatinine emerged as the only independent predictors of ESRD. Conclusions: DDD is clinically and pathologically heterogeneous. Adults have worse outcome than children, despite similar treatment. Combined IS/RAS blockade appears superior to either agent alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-32
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis
Renin-Angiotensin System
Immunosuppression
Pediatrics
Chronic Kidney Failure
Renal Insufficiency
Creatinine
Nephrotic Syndrome
Hematuria
Glomerulonephritis
Therapeutics
Multivariate Analysis
Urine
Electrons
Kidney
Biopsy
Incidence
Proteins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Nasr, S. H., Valeri, A. M., Appel, G. B., Sherwinter, J., Stokes, M. B., Said, S. M., ... D'Agati, V. D. (2009). Dense deposit disease: Clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 4(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03480708

Dense deposit disease : Clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients. / Nasr, Samih H.; Valeri, Anthony M.; Appel, Gerald B.; Sherwinter, Julius; Stokes, Michael B.; Said, Samar M.; Markowitz, Glen S.; D'Agati, Vivette D.

In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 22-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nasr, SH, Valeri, AM, Appel, GB, Sherwinter, J, Stokes, MB, Said, SM, Markowitz, GS & D'Agati, VD 2009, 'Dense deposit disease: Clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients', Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22-32. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03480708
Nasr, Samih H. ; Valeri, Anthony M. ; Appel, Gerald B. ; Sherwinter, Julius ; Stokes, Michael B. ; Said, Samar M. ; Markowitz, Glen S. ; D'Agati, Vivette D. / Dense deposit disease : Clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients. In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2009 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 22-32.
@article{9cfe92c388f14965b76d7b01ce61cf05,
title = "Dense deposit disease: Clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients",
abstract = "Background and objectives: Dense deposit disease (DDD) is a rare disorder that most commonly affects children. This study reports the largest North American series addressing clinicopathologic and outcome differences in children and adults. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Thirty-two patients with DDD were analyzed from the archives of Columbia University between 1977 and 2007. Characteristic intramembranous electron-dense deposits defined all diagnoses. Results: The cohort included 14 children (<16 yr) and 18 adults, with 39{\%} of adults >60 yr. The female/male ratio was 1.9. At presentation, the mean 24-h urine protein was 4.6 g, nephrotic syndrome was present in 33{\%}, renal insufficiency in 59{\%}, and hematuria in 87{\%} of patients. Compared with adults, children had lower incidence of renal insufficiency and were more likely to have reduced C3. Histologic pattern included membranoproliferative, mesangial, endocapillary, and crescentic glomerulonephritis. Treatment included immunosuppression (IS) alone in seven, renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockade alone in six, and combined IS/RAS blockade in 11. On follow-up (mean 63 mo) available in 27 patients, 26{\%} had complete response, 48{\%} had persistent renal dysfunction, and 26{\%} had ESRD. Correlates of ESRD were older age and higher creatinine at biopsy, the absence of combined IS/RAS blockade therapy and the presence of subepithelial humps, but not histologic pattern. On multivariate analysis, age and creatinine emerged as the only independent predictors of ESRD. Conclusions: DDD is clinically and pathologically heterogeneous. Adults have worse outcome than children, despite similar treatment. Combined IS/RAS blockade appears superior to either agent alone.",
author = "Nasr, {Samih H.} and Valeri, {Anthony M.} and Appel, {Gerald B.} and Julius Sherwinter and Stokes, {Michael B.} and Said, {Samar M.} and Markowitz, {Glen S.} and D'Agati, {Vivette D.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2215/CJN.03480708",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "22--32",
journal = "Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology",
issn = "1555-9041",
publisher = "American Society of Nephrology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dense deposit disease

T2 - Clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients

AU - Nasr, Samih H.

AU - Valeri, Anthony M.

AU - Appel, Gerald B.

AU - Sherwinter, Julius

AU - Stokes, Michael B.

AU - Said, Samar M.

AU - Markowitz, Glen S.

AU - D'Agati, Vivette D.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Background and objectives: Dense deposit disease (DDD) is a rare disorder that most commonly affects children. This study reports the largest North American series addressing clinicopathologic and outcome differences in children and adults. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Thirty-two patients with DDD were analyzed from the archives of Columbia University between 1977 and 2007. Characteristic intramembranous electron-dense deposits defined all diagnoses. Results: The cohort included 14 children (<16 yr) and 18 adults, with 39% of adults >60 yr. The female/male ratio was 1.9. At presentation, the mean 24-h urine protein was 4.6 g, nephrotic syndrome was present in 33%, renal insufficiency in 59%, and hematuria in 87% of patients. Compared with adults, children had lower incidence of renal insufficiency and were more likely to have reduced C3. Histologic pattern included membranoproliferative, mesangial, endocapillary, and crescentic glomerulonephritis. Treatment included immunosuppression (IS) alone in seven, renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockade alone in six, and combined IS/RAS blockade in 11. On follow-up (mean 63 mo) available in 27 patients, 26% had complete response, 48% had persistent renal dysfunction, and 26% had ESRD. Correlates of ESRD were older age and higher creatinine at biopsy, the absence of combined IS/RAS blockade therapy and the presence of subepithelial humps, but not histologic pattern. On multivariate analysis, age and creatinine emerged as the only independent predictors of ESRD. Conclusions: DDD is clinically and pathologically heterogeneous. Adults have worse outcome than children, despite similar treatment. Combined IS/RAS blockade appears superior to either agent alone.

AB - Background and objectives: Dense deposit disease (DDD) is a rare disorder that most commonly affects children. This study reports the largest North American series addressing clinicopathologic and outcome differences in children and adults. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Thirty-two patients with DDD were analyzed from the archives of Columbia University between 1977 and 2007. Characteristic intramembranous electron-dense deposits defined all diagnoses. Results: The cohort included 14 children (<16 yr) and 18 adults, with 39% of adults >60 yr. The female/male ratio was 1.9. At presentation, the mean 24-h urine protein was 4.6 g, nephrotic syndrome was present in 33%, renal insufficiency in 59%, and hematuria in 87% of patients. Compared with adults, children had lower incidence of renal insufficiency and were more likely to have reduced C3. Histologic pattern included membranoproliferative, mesangial, endocapillary, and crescentic glomerulonephritis. Treatment included immunosuppression (IS) alone in seven, renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockade alone in six, and combined IS/RAS blockade in 11. On follow-up (mean 63 mo) available in 27 patients, 26% had complete response, 48% had persistent renal dysfunction, and 26% had ESRD. Correlates of ESRD were older age and higher creatinine at biopsy, the absence of combined IS/RAS blockade therapy and the presence of subepithelial humps, but not histologic pattern. On multivariate analysis, age and creatinine emerged as the only independent predictors of ESRD. Conclusions: DDD is clinically and pathologically heterogeneous. Adults have worse outcome than children, despite similar treatment. Combined IS/RAS blockade appears superior to either agent alone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64049119966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64049119966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2215/CJN.03480708

DO - 10.2215/CJN.03480708

M3 - Article

C2 - 18971369

AN - SCOPUS:64049119966

VL - 4

SP - 22

EP - 32

JO - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

JF - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

SN - 1555-9041

IS - 1

ER -