Delayed cervical palsy following cervical spine fusion leads to an increase in hospital-related costs

Ross C. Puffer, William E. Clifton, Grant W. Mallory, Michelle J. Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECT: Delayed cervical palsy (DCP) is a known complication following cervical spine surgery. While most DCPs eventually improve, they can result in significant temporary disability. Postoperative complications affect hospital length of stay (LOS) as well as overall hospital cost. The authors sought to determine the hospital cost of DCP after cervical spine fusion operations. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing cervical fusion for degenerative disease at the Mayo Clinic from 2008 to 2012 was performed. Patients who developed DCPs not attributable to intraoperative trauma were included. All nonoperative-related costs were compared with similar costs in a control group matched according to age, sex, and surgical approach. All costs and services were reflective of the standard costs for the current year. Raw cost data were presented using ratios due to institutional policy against publishing cost data. RESULTS: There were 27 patients (18 men, 9 women) who underwent fusion and developed a DCP over the study period. These patients were compared with 24 controls (15 men, 9 women) undergoing fusion in the same time period. There was no difference between patients and controls in mean age (62.4 ± 3.1 years vs 63.8 ± 2.5 years, respectively; p = 0.74), LOS (4.2 ± 3.3 days vs 3.8 ± 4.5 days, respectively; p = 0.43), or operating room-related costs (1.08 ± 0.09 vs 1.0 ± 0.07, respectively; p = 0.58). There was a significant difference in nonoperative hospital-related costs between patients and controls (1.67 ± 0.15 vs 1.0 ± 0.09, respectively; p = 0.04). There was a significantly higher utilization of postoperative imaging (CT or MRI) in the DCP group (14/27, 52%) when compared with the matched cohort (4/24, 17%; p = 0.018), and a significantly higher utilization of physiatry services (24/27 [89%] vs 15/24 [63%], respectively; p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: While DCPs did not significantly prolong the length of hospitalization, they did increase hospital-related costs. This method could be further extrapolated to model costs of other complications as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-14
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2015

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Control
  • Delayed cervical palsy
  • Fusion
  • Hospital costs
  • Length of stay
  • Operating room costs
  • Physiatry
  • Postoperative imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this