Defining certainty of net benefit

A GRADE concept paper

Brian S. Alper, Peter Oettgen, Ilkka Kunnamo, Alfonso Iorio, Mohammed Toseef Ansari, Mohammad H Murad, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Amir Qaseem, Monica Hultcrantz, Holger J. Schünemann, Gordon Guyatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology is used to assess and report certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations. This GRADE concept article is not GRADE guidance but introduces certainty of net benefit, defined as the certainty that the balance between desirable and undesirable health effects is favourable. Determining certainty of net benefit requires considering certainty of effect estimates, the expected importance of outcomes and variability in importance, and the interaction of these concepts. Certainty of net harm is the certainty that the net effect is unfavourable. Guideline panels using or testing this approach might limit strong recommendations to actions with a high certainty of net benefit or against actions with a moderate or high certainty of net harm. Recommendations may differ in direction or strength from that suggested by the certainty of net benefit or harm when influenced by cost, equity, acceptability or feasibility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere027445
JournalBMJ open
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health
Direction compound

Keywords

  • clinical decision making
  • decision analysis
  • evidence synthesis
  • evidence-based medicine
  • guideline development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Alper, B. S., Oettgen, P., Kunnamo, I., Iorio, A., Ansari, M. T., Murad, M. H., ... Guyatt, G. (2019). Defining certainty of net benefit: A GRADE concept paper. BMJ open, 9(6), [e027445]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027445

Defining certainty of net benefit : A GRADE concept paper. / Alper, Brian S.; Oettgen, Peter; Kunnamo, Ilkka; Iorio, Alfonso; Ansari, Mohammed Toseef; Murad, Mohammad H; Meerpohl, Joerg J.; Qaseem, Amir; Hultcrantz, Monica; Schünemann, Holger J.; Guyatt, Gordon.

In: BMJ open, Vol. 9, No. 6, e027445, 01.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alper, BS, Oettgen, P, Kunnamo, I, Iorio, A, Ansari, MT, Murad, MH, Meerpohl, JJ, Qaseem, A, Hultcrantz, M, Schünemann, HJ & Guyatt, G 2019, 'Defining certainty of net benefit: A GRADE concept paper', BMJ open, vol. 9, no. 6, e027445. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027445
Alper BS, Oettgen P, Kunnamo I, Iorio A, Ansari MT, Murad MH et al. Defining certainty of net benefit: A GRADE concept paper. BMJ open. 2019 Jun 1;9(6). e027445. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027445
Alper, Brian S. ; Oettgen, Peter ; Kunnamo, Ilkka ; Iorio, Alfonso ; Ansari, Mohammed Toseef ; Murad, Mohammad H ; Meerpohl, Joerg J. ; Qaseem, Amir ; Hultcrantz, Monica ; Schünemann, Holger J. ; Guyatt, Gordon. / Defining certainty of net benefit : A GRADE concept paper. In: BMJ open. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 6.
@article{75f75725d77b45f2bf05b5bc1320f084,
title = "Defining certainty of net benefit: A GRADE concept paper",
abstract = "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology is used to assess and report certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations. This GRADE concept article is not GRADE guidance but introduces certainty of net benefit, defined as the certainty that the balance between desirable and undesirable health effects is favourable. Determining certainty of net benefit requires considering certainty of effect estimates, the expected importance of outcomes and variability in importance, and the interaction of these concepts. Certainty of net harm is the certainty that the net effect is unfavourable. Guideline panels using or testing this approach might limit strong recommendations to actions with a high certainty of net benefit or against actions with a moderate or high certainty of net harm. Recommendations may differ in direction or strength from that suggested by the certainty of net benefit or harm when influenced by cost, equity, acceptability or feasibility.",
keywords = "clinical decision making, decision analysis, evidence synthesis, evidence-based medicine, guideline development",
author = "Alper, {Brian S.} and Peter Oettgen and Ilkka Kunnamo and Alfonso Iorio and Ansari, {Mohammed Toseef} and Murad, {Mohammad H} and Meerpohl, {Joerg J.} and Amir Qaseem and Monica Hultcrantz and Sch{\"u}nemann, {Holger J.} and Gordon Guyatt",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027445",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining certainty of net benefit

T2 - A GRADE concept paper

AU - Alper, Brian S.

AU - Oettgen, Peter

AU - Kunnamo, Ilkka

AU - Iorio, Alfonso

AU - Ansari, Mohammed Toseef

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

AU - Meerpohl, Joerg J.

AU - Qaseem, Amir

AU - Hultcrantz, Monica

AU - Schünemann, Holger J.

AU - Guyatt, Gordon

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology is used to assess and report certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations. This GRADE concept article is not GRADE guidance but introduces certainty of net benefit, defined as the certainty that the balance between desirable and undesirable health effects is favourable. Determining certainty of net benefit requires considering certainty of effect estimates, the expected importance of outcomes and variability in importance, and the interaction of these concepts. Certainty of net harm is the certainty that the net effect is unfavourable. Guideline panels using or testing this approach might limit strong recommendations to actions with a high certainty of net benefit or against actions with a moderate or high certainty of net harm. Recommendations may differ in direction or strength from that suggested by the certainty of net benefit or harm when influenced by cost, equity, acceptability or feasibility.

AB - Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology is used to assess and report certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations. This GRADE concept article is not GRADE guidance but introduces certainty of net benefit, defined as the certainty that the balance between desirable and undesirable health effects is favourable. Determining certainty of net benefit requires considering certainty of effect estimates, the expected importance of outcomes and variability in importance, and the interaction of these concepts. Certainty of net harm is the certainty that the net effect is unfavourable. Guideline panels using or testing this approach might limit strong recommendations to actions with a high certainty of net benefit or against actions with a moderate or high certainty of net harm. Recommendations may differ in direction or strength from that suggested by the certainty of net benefit or harm when influenced by cost, equity, acceptability or feasibility.

KW - clinical decision making

KW - decision analysis

KW - evidence synthesis

KW - evidence-based medicine

KW - guideline development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067065448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067065448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027445

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027445

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 6

M1 - e027445

ER -