Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians: A dyadic approach to shared decision making

Annie LeBlanc, David A. Kenny, Annette M. O'Connor, France Légaré

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Decisional conflict is defined as personal uncertainty about which course of action to take when choice among competing options involves risk, regret, or challenge to personal life values. It is influenced by inadequate knowledge, unclear values, inadequate support, and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made. Until recently, it has been studied at the individual level, which ignores the interpersonal system between patients and physicians. Objective. To explore the effect of feeling uninformed, unclear values, inadequate support, and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made on one own's outcome (actor effect) and on the other person's outcome (partner effect). Methods. After a clinical encounter, modifiable deficits and personal uncertainty were measured in physicians and patients using the Decisional Conflict Scale. Structural equation modeling was used to measure the parameters of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Results. A total of 112 dyads of physicians and patients were included in the analysis. For both patients and physicians, 2 actor effects, unclear values (P < 0:0001) and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made (P < 0:0001), were found to be positively correlated with personal uncertainty. One partner effect, feeling uninformed (P=0:03), was found to be negatively correlated with personal uncertainty. Conclusions. Personal uncertainty of patients and physicians is influenced not only by their respective deficits but also by the deficits of the other member of the dyad. Our results indicate that the more unclear the expression of their own values and the more they perceive that an ineffective choice had been made, the more both physicians and patients experience personal uncertainty. They also indicate that the less uninformed they feel, the more both physicians and patients experience personal uncertainty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-68
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Decision Making
Physicians
Emotions
Value of Life
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Actor-partner interdependence model
  • Decisional conflict
  • Dyadic decision making
  • Physician-patient relationship
  • Relationship-centered care
  • Shared decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians : A dyadic approach to shared decision making. / LeBlanc, Annie; Kenny, David A.; O'Connor, Annette M.; Légaré, France.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 61-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

LeBlanc, Annie ; Kenny, David A. ; O'Connor, Annette M. ; Légaré, France. / Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians : A dyadic approach to shared decision making. In: Medical Decision Making. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 61-68.
@article{e3a3e52d9ec94a49bfba0c31a03bda37,
title = "Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians: A dyadic approach to shared decision making",
abstract = "Background. Decisional conflict is defined as personal uncertainty about which course of action to take when choice among competing options involves risk, regret, or challenge to personal life values. It is influenced by inadequate knowledge, unclear values, inadequate support, and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made. Until recently, it has been studied at the individual level, which ignores the interpersonal system between patients and physicians. Objective. To explore the effect of feeling uninformed, unclear values, inadequate support, and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made on one own's outcome (actor effect) and on the other person's outcome (partner effect). Methods. After a clinical encounter, modifiable deficits and personal uncertainty were measured in physicians and patients using the Decisional Conflict Scale. Structural equation modeling was used to measure the parameters of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Results. A total of 112 dyads of physicians and patients were included in the analysis. For both patients and physicians, 2 actor effects, unclear values (P < 0:0001) and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made (P < 0:0001), were found to be positively correlated with personal uncertainty. One partner effect, feeling uninformed (P=0:03), was found to be negatively correlated with personal uncertainty. Conclusions. Personal uncertainty of patients and physicians is influenced not only by their respective deficits but also by the deficits of the other member of the dyad. Our results indicate that the more unclear the expression of their own values and the more they perceive that an ineffective choice had been made, the more both physicians and patients experience personal uncertainty. They also indicate that the less uninformed they feel, the more both physicians and patients experience personal uncertainty.",
keywords = "Actor-partner interdependence model, Decisional conflict, Dyadic decision making, Physician-patient relationship, Relationship-centered care, Shared decision making",
author = "Annie LeBlanc and Kenny, {David A.} and O'Connor, {Annette M.} and France L{\'e}gar{\'e}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X08327067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "61--68",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians

T2 - A dyadic approach to shared decision making

AU - LeBlanc, Annie

AU - Kenny, David A.

AU - O'Connor, Annette M.

AU - Légaré, France

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Background. Decisional conflict is defined as personal uncertainty about which course of action to take when choice among competing options involves risk, regret, or challenge to personal life values. It is influenced by inadequate knowledge, unclear values, inadequate support, and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made. Until recently, it has been studied at the individual level, which ignores the interpersonal system between patients and physicians. Objective. To explore the effect of feeling uninformed, unclear values, inadequate support, and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made on one own's outcome (actor effect) and on the other person's outcome (partner effect). Methods. After a clinical encounter, modifiable deficits and personal uncertainty were measured in physicians and patients using the Decisional Conflict Scale. Structural equation modeling was used to measure the parameters of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Results. A total of 112 dyads of physicians and patients were included in the analysis. For both patients and physicians, 2 actor effects, unclear values (P < 0:0001) and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made (P < 0:0001), were found to be positively correlated with personal uncertainty. One partner effect, feeling uninformed (P=0:03), was found to be negatively correlated with personal uncertainty. Conclusions. Personal uncertainty of patients and physicians is influenced not only by their respective deficits but also by the deficits of the other member of the dyad. Our results indicate that the more unclear the expression of their own values and the more they perceive that an ineffective choice had been made, the more both physicians and patients experience personal uncertainty. They also indicate that the less uninformed they feel, the more both physicians and patients experience personal uncertainty.

AB - Background. Decisional conflict is defined as personal uncertainty about which course of action to take when choice among competing options involves risk, regret, or challenge to personal life values. It is influenced by inadequate knowledge, unclear values, inadequate support, and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made. Until recently, it has been studied at the individual level, which ignores the interpersonal system between patients and physicians. Objective. To explore the effect of feeling uninformed, unclear values, inadequate support, and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made on one own's outcome (actor effect) and on the other person's outcome (partner effect). Methods. After a clinical encounter, modifiable deficits and personal uncertainty were measured in physicians and patients using the Decisional Conflict Scale. Structural equation modeling was used to measure the parameters of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Results. A total of 112 dyads of physicians and patients were included in the analysis. For both patients and physicians, 2 actor effects, unclear values (P < 0:0001) and the perception that an ineffective decision has been made (P < 0:0001), were found to be positively correlated with personal uncertainty. One partner effect, feeling uninformed (P=0:03), was found to be negatively correlated with personal uncertainty. Conclusions. Personal uncertainty of patients and physicians is influenced not only by their respective deficits but also by the deficits of the other member of the dyad. Our results indicate that the more unclear the expression of their own values and the more they perceive that an ineffective choice had been made, the more both physicians and patients experience personal uncertainty. They also indicate that the less uninformed they feel, the more both physicians and patients experience personal uncertainty.

KW - Actor-partner interdependence model

KW - Decisional conflict

KW - Dyadic decision making

KW - Physician-patient relationship

KW - Relationship-centered care

KW - Shared decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59549095686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59549095686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X08327067

DO - 10.1177/0272989X08327067

M3 - Article

C2 - 19196706

AN - SCOPUS:59549095686

VL - 29

SP - 61

EP - 68

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 1

ER -