CZT detectors: How important is energy resolution for nuclear breast imaging?

Carrie B Hruska, Michael K. O'Connor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Semiconductor detectors, such as Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT), offer improved energy resolution (ER) and potentially improved tumor contrast in breast imaging. We evaluated the effect of changes in ER on tumor contrast. Studies were performed on a prototype CZT detector, a commercial CZT-based system, a multicrystal CsI system and a conventional NaI system. The same low energy high resolution collimator was used on each system and the same total counts (250 kcts) were acquired in each image. CZTmodules in a detector can exhibit different ERs. We imaged a breast phantom containing 4 tumors (diameters 4.9, 7.2, 7.2, and 9.8 mm) over individual CZT modules with intrinsic ers of 5.8-17.5%. Tumor to background ratio was 6.2:1 and tumors were placed 1 and 4 cm deep in the 6-cm thick breast phantom. A standard ±10% energy window and narrower energy windows (-5%/ +10% and -7%/ +10%) were used. Tumor contrast was determined by maximum tumor intensity divided by mean background intensity. Tumor contrast was not significantly affected by differences in ER between CZT modules. Tumor contrast improved by 2-10% with a narrow energy window. At the same ER, the CZT systems yielded slightly better contrast than the CsI system. All pixilated systems performed better than the NaI system. Scatter in the breast was found to be low and accounts for only ∼11% of counts in a ±10% energy window for a 6 cm- thick breast. No strong relationship was observed between ER and tumor detectability, which may be due to low scatter in the breast. Detector element size in pixilated systems appears to be more important than ER in determining tumor contrast.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-75
Number of pages4
JournalPhysica Medica
Volume21
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Nuclear Energy
zinc tellurides
cadmium tellurides
breast
Breast
tumors
detectors
Neoplasms
energy
CdZnTe
modules
Semiconductors
collimators

Keywords

  • Breast
  • Contrast
  • CZT
  • Energy resolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

CZT detectors : How important is energy resolution for nuclear breast imaging? / Hruska, Carrie B; O'Connor, Michael K.

In: Physica Medica, Vol. 21, No. SUPPL. 1, 2006, p. 72-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hruska, Carrie B ; O'Connor, Michael K. / CZT detectors : How important is energy resolution for nuclear breast imaging?. In: Physica Medica. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. SUPPL. 1. pp. 72-75.
@article{5fa33f54c12a456abbbaaaa880bc517f,
title = "CZT detectors: How important is energy resolution for nuclear breast imaging?",
abstract = "Semiconductor detectors, such as Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT), offer improved energy resolution (ER) and potentially improved tumor contrast in breast imaging. We evaluated the effect of changes in ER on tumor contrast. Studies were performed on a prototype CZT detector, a commercial CZT-based system, a multicrystal CsI system and a conventional NaI system. The same low energy high resolution collimator was used on each system and the same total counts (250 kcts) were acquired in each image. CZTmodules in a detector can exhibit different ERs. We imaged a breast phantom containing 4 tumors (diameters 4.9, 7.2, 7.2, and 9.8 mm) over individual CZT modules with intrinsic ers of 5.8-17.5{\%}. Tumor to background ratio was 6.2:1 and tumors were placed 1 and 4 cm deep in the 6-cm thick breast phantom. A standard ±10{\%} energy window and narrower energy windows (-5{\%}/ +10{\%} and -7{\%}/ +10{\%}) were used. Tumor contrast was determined by maximum tumor intensity divided by mean background intensity. Tumor contrast was not significantly affected by differences in ER between CZT modules. Tumor contrast improved by 2-10{\%} with a narrow energy window. At the same ER, the CZT systems yielded slightly better contrast than the CsI system. All pixilated systems performed better than the NaI system. Scatter in the breast was found to be low and accounts for only ∼11{\%} of counts in a ±10{\%} energy window for a 6 cm- thick breast. No strong relationship was observed between ER and tumor detectability, which may be due to low scatter in the breast. Detector element size in pixilated systems appears to be more important than ER in determining tumor contrast.",
keywords = "Breast, Contrast, CZT, Energy resolution",
author = "Hruska, {Carrie B} and O'Connor, {Michael K.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/S1120-1797(06)80029-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "72--75",
journal = "Physica Medica",
issn = "1120-1797",
publisher = "Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CZT detectors

T2 - How important is energy resolution for nuclear breast imaging?

AU - Hruska, Carrie B

AU - O'Connor, Michael K.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Semiconductor detectors, such as Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT), offer improved energy resolution (ER) and potentially improved tumor contrast in breast imaging. We evaluated the effect of changes in ER on tumor contrast. Studies were performed on a prototype CZT detector, a commercial CZT-based system, a multicrystal CsI system and a conventional NaI system. The same low energy high resolution collimator was used on each system and the same total counts (250 kcts) were acquired in each image. CZTmodules in a detector can exhibit different ERs. We imaged a breast phantom containing 4 tumors (diameters 4.9, 7.2, 7.2, and 9.8 mm) over individual CZT modules with intrinsic ers of 5.8-17.5%. Tumor to background ratio was 6.2:1 and tumors were placed 1 and 4 cm deep in the 6-cm thick breast phantom. A standard ±10% energy window and narrower energy windows (-5%/ +10% and -7%/ +10%) were used. Tumor contrast was determined by maximum tumor intensity divided by mean background intensity. Tumor contrast was not significantly affected by differences in ER between CZT modules. Tumor contrast improved by 2-10% with a narrow energy window. At the same ER, the CZT systems yielded slightly better contrast than the CsI system. All pixilated systems performed better than the NaI system. Scatter in the breast was found to be low and accounts for only ∼11% of counts in a ±10% energy window for a 6 cm- thick breast. No strong relationship was observed between ER and tumor detectability, which may be due to low scatter in the breast. Detector element size in pixilated systems appears to be more important than ER in determining tumor contrast.

AB - Semiconductor detectors, such as Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT), offer improved energy resolution (ER) and potentially improved tumor contrast in breast imaging. We evaluated the effect of changes in ER on tumor contrast. Studies were performed on a prototype CZT detector, a commercial CZT-based system, a multicrystal CsI system and a conventional NaI system. The same low energy high resolution collimator was used on each system and the same total counts (250 kcts) were acquired in each image. CZTmodules in a detector can exhibit different ERs. We imaged a breast phantom containing 4 tumors (diameters 4.9, 7.2, 7.2, and 9.8 mm) over individual CZT modules with intrinsic ers of 5.8-17.5%. Tumor to background ratio was 6.2:1 and tumors were placed 1 and 4 cm deep in the 6-cm thick breast phantom. A standard ±10% energy window and narrower energy windows (-5%/ +10% and -7%/ +10%) were used. Tumor contrast was determined by maximum tumor intensity divided by mean background intensity. Tumor contrast was not significantly affected by differences in ER between CZT modules. Tumor contrast improved by 2-10% with a narrow energy window. At the same ER, the CZT systems yielded slightly better contrast than the CsI system. All pixilated systems performed better than the NaI system. Scatter in the breast was found to be low and accounts for only ∼11% of counts in a ±10% energy window for a 6 cm- thick breast. No strong relationship was observed between ER and tumor detectability, which may be due to low scatter in the breast. Detector element size in pixilated systems appears to be more important than ER in determining tumor contrast.

KW - Breast

KW - Contrast

KW - CZT

KW - Energy resolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247239805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247239805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1120-1797(06)80029-3

DO - 10.1016/S1120-1797(06)80029-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 17645999

AN - SCOPUS:34247239805

VL - 21

SP - 72

EP - 75

JO - Physica Medica

JF - Physica Medica

SN - 1120-1797

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -