Cytotoxicity of Adriamycin in MGH-U1 cells grown as monolayer cultures, spheroids, and xenografts in immune-deprived mice

C. Erlichman, D. Vidgen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The cytotoxic activity of Adriamycin was examined in the MGH-U1 human bladder carcinoma line, grown as monolayer culture, as spheroids, and as xenografts in immune-deprived mice. The MGH-U1 cells grown as spheroids were much more resistant to Adriamycin (concentration of drug resulting in 37% cell survival, 4.5 μg/ml) than when treated as monolayer cultures (concentration of drug resulting in 37% cell survival, 0.9 μg/ml). Adriamycin fluorescence was demonstrated only in the outer two layers of cells forming the spheroids, suggesting that limited drug penetration is an important factor in the resistance of spheroids to Adriamycin. Sequential trypsinization of spheroids 750 μm in diameter allowed us to determine the cytotoxic effects of Adriamycin in MGH-U1 cells derived from different depths of the spheroid. We found that cells near the surface of the spheroid had a survival similar to those of exponentially growing monolayer cells treated with Adriamycin. Cells located in the middle of the viable rim were more resistant to Adriamycin, and those found near the necrotic center were most resistant to Adriamycin. The effects of Adriamycin treatment on spheroid growth delay were determined also. In spite of a small cytotoxic effect on the clonogenic fraction of cells in MGH-U1 spheroids, the growth delay effect of Adriamycin in intact spheroids was marked. This observation is consistent with Adriamycin killing primarily the cells in the outer layers of the spheroid, where most of the proliferation in the spheroid occurs. In vivo treatment of MGH-U1 xenografts with Adriamycin followed by assessment of cell survival in vitro showed minimal evidence of cytotoxicity, consistent with the poor drug penetration observed in the spheroid model. These studies suggest that: (a) Adriamycin penetrates poorly into solid tissues; (b) in vitro clonogenic survival following Adriamycin exposure of a cell suspension may predict falsely for drug sensitivity to chemotherapy; (c) a small decrease in clonogenic survival can be translated into a long growth delay but, ultimately, the tumor regrows because some clonogenic cells are spared; and (d) for Adriamycin, the spheroid model more closely parallels the in vivo effects than does monolayer culture. The use of the spheroid model for the study of Adriamycin cytotoxicity gives further insight into the action of this drug in solid tumors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5369-5375
Number of pages7
JournalCancer Research
Volume44
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Heterografts
Doxorubicin
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Cell Survival
Growth
R Factors
Neoplasms
Suspensions
Urinary Bladder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Cytotoxicity of Adriamycin in MGH-U1 cells grown as monolayer cultures, spheroids, and xenografts in immune-deprived mice. / Erlichman, C.; Vidgen, D.

In: Cancer Research, Vol. 44, No. 11, 1984, p. 5369-5375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1c37601527874056886bb0358b249bd5,
title = "Cytotoxicity of Adriamycin in MGH-U1 cells grown as monolayer cultures, spheroids, and xenografts in immune-deprived mice",
abstract = "The cytotoxic activity of Adriamycin was examined in the MGH-U1 human bladder carcinoma line, grown as monolayer culture, as spheroids, and as xenografts in immune-deprived mice. The MGH-U1 cells grown as spheroids were much more resistant to Adriamycin (concentration of drug resulting in 37{\%} cell survival, 4.5 μg/ml) than when treated as monolayer cultures (concentration of drug resulting in 37{\%} cell survival, 0.9 μg/ml). Adriamycin fluorescence was demonstrated only in the outer two layers of cells forming the spheroids, suggesting that limited drug penetration is an important factor in the resistance of spheroids to Adriamycin. Sequential trypsinization of spheroids 750 μm in diameter allowed us to determine the cytotoxic effects of Adriamycin in MGH-U1 cells derived from different depths of the spheroid. We found that cells near the surface of the spheroid had a survival similar to those of exponentially growing monolayer cells treated with Adriamycin. Cells located in the middle of the viable rim were more resistant to Adriamycin, and those found near the necrotic center were most resistant to Adriamycin. The effects of Adriamycin treatment on spheroid growth delay were determined also. In spite of a small cytotoxic effect on the clonogenic fraction of cells in MGH-U1 spheroids, the growth delay effect of Adriamycin in intact spheroids was marked. This observation is consistent with Adriamycin killing primarily the cells in the outer layers of the spheroid, where most of the proliferation in the spheroid occurs. In vivo treatment of MGH-U1 xenografts with Adriamycin followed by assessment of cell survival in vitro showed minimal evidence of cytotoxicity, consistent with the poor drug penetration observed in the spheroid model. These studies suggest that: (a) Adriamycin penetrates poorly into solid tissues; (b) in vitro clonogenic survival following Adriamycin exposure of a cell suspension may predict falsely for drug sensitivity to chemotherapy; (c) a small decrease in clonogenic survival can be translated into a long growth delay but, ultimately, the tumor regrows because some clonogenic cells are spared; and (d) for Adriamycin, the spheroid model more closely parallels the in vivo effects than does monolayer culture. The use of the spheroid model for the study of Adriamycin cytotoxicity gives further insight into the action of this drug in solid tumors.",
author = "C. Erlichman and D. Vidgen",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "5369--5375",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Research",
issn = "0099-7013",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cytotoxicity of Adriamycin in MGH-U1 cells grown as monolayer cultures, spheroids, and xenografts in immune-deprived mice

AU - Erlichman, C.

AU - Vidgen, D.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - The cytotoxic activity of Adriamycin was examined in the MGH-U1 human bladder carcinoma line, grown as monolayer culture, as spheroids, and as xenografts in immune-deprived mice. The MGH-U1 cells grown as spheroids were much more resistant to Adriamycin (concentration of drug resulting in 37% cell survival, 4.5 μg/ml) than when treated as monolayer cultures (concentration of drug resulting in 37% cell survival, 0.9 μg/ml). Adriamycin fluorescence was demonstrated only in the outer two layers of cells forming the spheroids, suggesting that limited drug penetration is an important factor in the resistance of spheroids to Adriamycin. Sequential trypsinization of spheroids 750 μm in diameter allowed us to determine the cytotoxic effects of Adriamycin in MGH-U1 cells derived from different depths of the spheroid. We found that cells near the surface of the spheroid had a survival similar to those of exponentially growing monolayer cells treated with Adriamycin. Cells located in the middle of the viable rim were more resistant to Adriamycin, and those found near the necrotic center were most resistant to Adriamycin. The effects of Adriamycin treatment on spheroid growth delay were determined also. In spite of a small cytotoxic effect on the clonogenic fraction of cells in MGH-U1 spheroids, the growth delay effect of Adriamycin in intact spheroids was marked. This observation is consistent with Adriamycin killing primarily the cells in the outer layers of the spheroid, where most of the proliferation in the spheroid occurs. In vivo treatment of MGH-U1 xenografts with Adriamycin followed by assessment of cell survival in vitro showed minimal evidence of cytotoxicity, consistent with the poor drug penetration observed in the spheroid model. These studies suggest that: (a) Adriamycin penetrates poorly into solid tissues; (b) in vitro clonogenic survival following Adriamycin exposure of a cell suspension may predict falsely for drug sensitivity to chemotherapy; (c) a small decrease in clonogenic survival can be translated into a long growth delay but, ultimately, the tumor regrows because some clonogenic cells are spared; and (d) for Adriamycin, the spheroid model more closely parallels the in vivo effects than does monolayer culture. The use of the spheroid model for the study of Adriamycin cytotoxicity gives further insight into the action of this drug in solid tumors.

AB - The cytotoxic activity of Adriamycin was examined in the MGH-U1 human bladder carcinoma line, grown as monolayer culture, as spheroids, and as xenografts in immune-deprived mice. The MGH-U1 cells grown as spheroids were much more resistant to Adriamycin (concentration of drug resulting in 37% cell survival, 4.5 μg/ml) than when treated as monolayer cultures (concentration of drug resulting in 37% cell survival, 0.9 μg/ml). Adriamycin fluorescence was demonstrated only in the outer two layers of cells forming the spheroids, suggesting that limited drug penetration is an important factor in the resistance of spheroids to Adriamycin. Sequential trypsinization of spheroids 750 μm in diameter allowed us to determine the cytotoxic effects of Adriamycin in MGH-U1 cells derived from different depths of the spheroid. We found that cells near the surface of the spheroid had a survival similar to those of exponentially growing monolayer cells treated with Adriamycin. Cells located in the middle of the viable rim were more resistant to Adriamycin, and those found near the necrotic center were most resistant to Adriamycin. The effects of Adriamycin treatment on spheroid growth delay were determined also. In spite of a small cytotoxic effect on the clonogenic fraction of cells in MGH-U1 spheroids, the growth delay effect of Adriamycin in intact spheroids was marked. This observation is consistent with Adriamycin killing primarily the cells in the outer layers of the spheroid, where most of the proliferation in the spheroid occurs. In vivo treatment of MGH-U1 xenografts with Adriamycin followed by assessment of cell survival in vitro showed minimal evidence of cytotoxicity, consistent with the poor drug penetration observed in the spheroid model. These studies suggest that: (a) Adriamycin penetrates poorly into solid tissues; (b) in vitro clonogenic survival following Adriamycin exposure of a cell suspension may predict falsely for drug sensitivity to chemotherapy; (c) a small decrease in clonogenic survival can be translated into a long growth delay but, ultimately, the tumor regrows because some clonogenic cells are spared; and (d) for Adriamycin, the spheroid model more closely parallels the in vivo effects than does monolayer culture. The use of the spheroid model for the study of Adriamycin cytotoxicity gives further insight into the action of this drug in solid tumors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021684166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021684166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6488191

AN - SCOPUS:0021684166

VL - 44

SP - 5369

EP - 5375

JO - Journal of Cancer Research

JF - Journal of Cancer Research

SN - 0099-7013

IS - 11

ER -