Cytotechnologists as coinvestigators in anatomical pathology research

Karla J. Kopp, Marie R. Passow, Kristina M. Del Rosario, Michael R. Christensen, John W. O'Shaughnessy, Mary K. Bartholet, Mary E. Francis, Thomas J Flotte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The amount of time available to pathologists with which to perform research is becoming limited due to an increasing manpower shortage in pathology, decreased reimbursement, and increased workload. This is occurring at the same time as demands escalate for pathologists to develop new companion tests, correlate the molecular findings with traditional methods, and assist in the development of individualized medicine. This study examined whether cytotechnologists may be integrated into a research team that uses their expertise in understanding pathology and clinical disease to provide interpretations of experiments that traditionally were performed by pathologists. METHODS: Cytotechnologists worked with pathologists to choose blocks for tissue microarrays (TMAs) and to interpret immunohistochemically stained TMA slides. The pathologist met with the cytotechnologist to review the study design. The cytotechnologists reviewed the slides and blocks and chose the most appropriate blocks for the TMA. Either 10% or all of the slides/blocks selected for TMA construction were reviewed by the supervising pathologist. The final selections were given to the TMA technologist to make the TMA. A minimum of 10% of the immunohistochemically stained TMA slides were reviewed by the supervising pathologist. RESULTS: A total of 32 TMAs were created with 6 cytotechnologists collaborating with 6 pathologists. Immunohistochemical stains of 190 TMAs were interpreted by 4 cytotechnologists collaborating with 3 pathologists. All the TMAs and TMA interpretation data were used successfully for the research for which they were designed. CONCLUSIONS: The collaboration of cytotechnologists and pathologists in research can improve the quality of effort and increase satisfaction and productivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCancer cytopathology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Pathology
Research
Pathologists
Precision Medicine
Clinical Pathology
Workload
Coloring Agents

Keywords

  • Efficiency
  • Job satisfaction
  • Quality improvement
  • Tissue array analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Kopp, K. J., Passow, M. R., Del Rosario, K. M., Christensen, M. R., O'Shaughnessy, J. W., Bartholet, M. K., ... Flotte, T. J. (Accepted/In press). Cytotechnologists as coinvestigators in anatomical pathology research. Cancer cytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21968

Cytotechnologists as coinvestigators in anatomical pathology research. / Kopp, Karla J.; Passow, Marie R.; Del Rosario, Kristina M.; Christensen, Michael R.; O'Shaughnessy, John W.; Bartholet, Mary K.; Francis, Mary E.; Flotte, Thomas J.

In: Cancer cytopathology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kopp, KJ, Passow, MR, Del Rosario, KM, Christensen, MR, O'Shaughnessy, JW, Bartholet, MK, Francis, ME & Flotte, TJ 2018, 'Cytotechnologists as coinvestigators in anatomical pathology research', Cancer cytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21968
Kopp KJ, Passow MR, Del Rosario KM, Christensen MR, O'Shaughnessy JW, Bartholet MK et al. Cytotechnologists as coinvestigators in anatomical pathology research. Cancer cytopathology. 2018 Jan 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21968
Kopp, Karla J. ; Passow, Marie R. ; Del Rosario, Kristina M. ; Christensen, Michael R. ; O'Shaughnessy, John W. ; Bartholet, Mary K. ; Francis, Mary E. ; Flotte, Thomas J. / Cytotechnologists as coinvestigators in anatomical pathology research. In: Cancer cytopathology. 2018.
@article{c24321b522294adfb33f194378b39d24,
title = "Cytotechnologists as coinvestigators in anatomical pathology research",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The amount of time available to pathologists with which to perform research is becoming limited due to an increasing manpower shortage in pathology, decreased reimbursement, and increased workload. This is occurring at the same time as demands escalate for pathologists to develop new companion tests, correlate the molecular findings with traditional methods, and assist in the development of individualized medicine. This study examined whether cytotechnologists may be integrated into a research team that uses their expertise in understanding pathology and clinical disease to provide interpretations of experiments that traditionally were performed by pathologists. METHODS: Cytotechnologists worked with pathologists to choose blocks for tissue microarrays (TMAs) and to interpret immunohistochemically stained TMA slides. The pathologist met with the cytotechnologist to review the study design. The cytotechnologists reviewed the slides and blocks and chose the most appropriate blocks for the TMA. Either 10{\%} or all of the slides/blocks selected for TMA construction were reviewed by the supervising pathologist. The final selections were given to the TMA technologist to make the TMA. A minimum of 10{\%} of the immunohistochemically stained TMA slides were reviewed by the supervising pathologist. RESULTS: A total of 32 TMAs were created with 6 cytotechnologists collaborating with 6 pathologists. Immunohistochemical stains of 190 TMAs were interpreted by 4 cytotechnologists collaborating with 3 pathologists. All the TMAs and TMA interpretation data were used successfully for the research for which they were designed. CONCLUSIONS: The collaboration of cytotechnologists and pathologists in research can improve the quality of effort and increase satisfaction and productivity.",
keywords = "Efficiency, Job satisfaction, Quality improvement, Tissue array analysis",
author = "Kopp, {Karla J.} and Passow, {Marie R.} and {Del Rosario}, {Kristina M.} and Christensen, {Michael R.} and O'Shaughnessy, {John W.} and Bartholet, {Mary K.} and Francis, {Mary E.} and Flotte, {Thomas J}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/cncy.21968",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Cancer cytopathology",
issn = "1934-662X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cytotechnologists as coinvestigators in anatomical pathology research

AU - Kopp, Karla J.

AU - Passow, Marie R.

AU - Del Rosario, Kristina M.

AU - Christensen, Michael R.

AU - O'Shaughnessy, John W.

AU - Bartholet, Mary K.

AU - Francis, Mary E.

AU - Flotte, Thomas J

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The amount of time available to pathologists with which to perform research is becoming limited due to an increasing manpower shortage in pathology, decreased reimbursement, and increased workload. This is occurring at the same time as demands escalate for pathologists to develop new companion tests, correlate the molecular findings with traditional methods, and assist in the development of individualized medicine. This study examined whether cytotechnologists may be integrated into a research team that uses their expertise in understanding pathology and clinical disease to provide interpretations of experiments that traditionally were performed by pathologists. METHODS: Cytotechnologists worked with pathologists to choose blocks for tissue microarrays (TMAs) and to interpret immunohistochemically stained TMA slides. The pathologist met with the cytotechnologist to review the study design. The cytotechnologists reviewed the slides and blocks and chose the most appropriate blocks for the TMA. Either 10% or all of the slides/blocks selected for TMA construction were reviewed by the supervising pathologist. The final selections were given to the TMA technologist to make the TMA. A minimum of 10% of the immunohistochemically stained TMA slides were reviewed by the supervising pathologist. RESULTS: A total of 32 TMAs were created with 6 cytotechnologists collaborating with 6 pathologists. Immunohistochemical stains of 190 TMAs were interpreted by 4 cytotechnologists collaborating with 3 pathologists. All the TMAs and TMA interpretation data were used successfully for the research for which they were designed. CONCLUSIONS: The collaboration of cytotechnologists and pathologists in research can improve the quality of effort and increase satisfaction and productivity.

AB - BACKGROUND: The amount of time available to pathologists with which to perform research is becoming limited due to an increasing manpower shortage in pathology, decreased reimbursement, and increased workload. This is occurring at the same time as demands escalate for pathologists to develop new companion tests, correlate the molecular findings with traditional methods, and assist in the development of individualized medicine. This study examined whether cytotechnologists may be integrated into a research team that uses their expertise in understanding pathology and clinical disease to provide interpretations of experiments that traditionally were performed by pathologists. METHODS: Cytotechnologists worked with pathologists to choose blocks for tissue microarrays (TMAs) and to interpret immunohistochemically stained TMA slides. The pathologist met with the cytotechnologist to review the study design. The cytotechnologists reviewed the slides and blocks and chose the most appropriate blocks for the TMA. Either 10% or all of the slides/blocks selected for TMA construction were reviewed by the supervising pathologist. The final selections were given to the TMA technologist to make the TMA. A minimum of 10% of the immunohistochemically stained TMA slides were reviewed by the supervising pathologist. RESULTS: A total of 32 TMAs were created with 6 cytotechnologists collaborating with 6 pathologists. Immunohistochemical stains of 190 TMAs were interpreted by 4 cytotechnologists collaborating with 3 pathologists. All the TMAs and TMA interpretation data were used successfully for the research for which they were designed. CONCLUSIONS: The collaboration of cytotechnologists and pathologists in research can improve the quality of effort and increase satisfaction and productivity.

KW - Efficiency

KW - Job satisfaction

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Tissue array analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040235056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040235056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cncy.21968

DO - 10.1002/cncy.21968

M3 - Article

C2 - 29316317

AN - SCOPUS:85040235056

JO - Cancer cytopathology

JF - Cancer cytopathology

SN - 1934-662X

ER -