Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy

Patrick A. DeValeria, William A. Baumgartner, Alfred S. Casale, Peter S. Greene, Duke E. Cameron, Timothy J. Gardner, Vincent L. Gott, Levi Watkins, Bruce A. Reitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

105 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of the records of 60 patients who underwent pericardiectomy over a 10-year period (1980 to 1990) at The Johns Hopkins Hospital was performed. Indications for operation were effusive disease in 24 patients and constriction in 36 patients. Six patients (10%) with pericardial effusion had pain as the primary symptom necessitating intervention. The operative approach for pericardiectomy was median sternotomy in 52 patients (4 patients required cardiopulmonary bypass) and left anterior thoracotomy in 8 patients. Nine patients (5 with constriction and 4 with effusion) with a prior limited pericardial procedure required formal pericardiectomy. The operative mortality rate for pericardial effusion and constriction was 4.2% and 5.6%, respectively. Follow-up (median follow-up, 56.9 ± 38.2 months) was obtained on 56 patients (93.3%). Actuarial survival at 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years for all patients was 82.1% ± 5.1%, 71.7% ± 6.7%, and 59.8% ± 12.2%, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed using 20 clinical variables. A history of malignancy, previous pericardial procedure, and preoperative New York Heart Association class IV were found to be predictors of poor survival. All patients who underwent operation primarily for effusion with associated pain are alive and have improved functional capacity without steroid use. We conclude that pericardiectomy can be performed with low mortality and can result in good long-term survival and improved functional capacity. Patients who are seen primarily with pain refractory to steroid therapy can be relieved of symptoms with operation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-224
Number of pages6
JournalThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pericardiectomy
Constriction
Pericardial Effusion
Survival
Steroids
Preoperative Care
Pain
Intractable Pain
Sternotomy
Mortality
Thoracotomy
Cardiopulmonary Bypass

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

DeValeria, P. A., Baumgartner, W. A., Casale, A. S., Greene, P. S., Cameron, D. E., Gardner, T. J., ... Reitz, B. A. (1991). Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 52(2), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(91)91339-W

Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy. / DeValeria, Patrick A.; Baumgartner, William A.; Casale, Alfred S.; Greene, Peter S.; Cameron, Duke E.; Gardner, Timothy J.; Gott, Vincent L.; Watkins, Levi; Reitz, Bruce A.

In: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 52, No. 2, 1991, p. 219-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DeValeria, PA, Baumgartner, WA, Casale, AS, Greene, PS, Cameron, DE, Gardner, TJ, Gott, VL, Watkins, L & Reitz, BA 1991, 'Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy', The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(91)91339-W
DeValeria PA, Baumgartner WA, Casale AS, Greene PS, Cameron DE, Gardner TJ et al. Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1991;52(2):219-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(91)91339-W
DeValeria, Patrick A. ; Baumgartner, William A. ; Casale, Alfred S. ; Greene, Peter S. ; Cameron, Duke E. ; Gardner, Timothy J. ; Gott, Vincent L. ; Watkins, Levi ; Reitz, Bruce A. / Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy. In: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1991 ; Vol. 52, No. 2. pp. 219-224.
@article{f6537a7d39cb42dfa7781c1e67563e7c,
title = "Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy",
abstract = "A retrospective analysis of the records of 60 patients who underwent pericardiectomy over a 10-year period (1980 to 1990) at The Johns Hopkins Hospital was performed. Indications for operation were effusive disease in 24 patients and constriction in 36 patients. Six patients (10{\%}) with pericardial effusion had pain as the primary symptom necessitating intervention. The operative approach for pericardiectomy was median sternotomy in 52 patients (4 patients required cardiopulmonary bypass) and left anterior thoracotomy in 8 patients. Nine patients (5 with constriction and 4 with effusion) with a prior limited pericardial procedure required formal pericardiectomy. The operative mortality rate for pericardial effusion and constriction was 4.2{\%} and 5.6{\%}, respectively. Follow-up (median follow-up, 56.9 ± 38.2 months) was obtained on 56 patients (93.3{\%}). Actuarial survival at 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years for all patients was 82.1{\%} ± 5.1{\%}, 71.7{\%} ± 6.7{\%}, and 59.8{\%} ± 12.2{\%}, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed using 20 clinical variables. A history of malignancy, previous pericardial procedure, and preoperative New York Heart Association class IV were found to be predictors of poor survival. All patients who underwent operation primarily for effusion with associated pain are alive and have improved functional capacity without steroid use. We conclude that pericardiectomy can be performed with low mortality and can result in good long-term survival and improved functional capacity. Patients who are seen primarily with pain refractory to steroid therapy can be relieved of symptoms with operation.",
author = "DeValeria, {Patrick A.} and Baumgartner, {William A.} and Casale, {Alfred S.} and Greene, {Peter S.} and Cameron, {Duke E.} and Gardner, {Timothy J.} and Gott, {Vincent L.} and Levi Watkins and Reitz, {Bruce A.}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1016/0003-4975(91)91339-W",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "219--224",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy

AU - DeValeria, Patrick A.

AU - Baumgartner, William A.

AU - Casale, Alfred S.

AU - Greene, Peter S.

AU - Cameron, Duke E.

AU - Gardner, Timothy J.

AU - Gott, Vincent L.

AU - Watkins, Levi

AU - Reitz, Bruce A.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - A retrospective analysis of the records of 60 patients who underwent pericardiectomy over a 10-year period (1980 to 1990) at The Johns Hopkins Hospital was performed. Indications for operation were effusive disease in 24 patients and constriction in 36 patients. Six patients (10%) with pericardial effusion had pain as the primary symptom necessitating intervention. The operative approach for pericardiectomy was median sternotomy in 52 patients (4 patients required cardiopulmonary bypass) and left anterior thoracotomy in 8 patients. Nine patients (5 with constriction and 4 with effusion) with a prior limited pericardial procedure required formal pericardiectomy. The operative mortality rate for pericardial effusion and constriction was 4.2% and 5.6%, respectively. Follow-up (median follow-up, 56.9 ± 38.2 months) was obtained on 56 patients (93.3%). Actuarial survival at 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years for all patients was 82.1% ± 5.1%, 71.7% ± 6.7%, and 59.8% ± 12.2%, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed using 20 clinical variables. A history of malignancy, previous pericardial procedure, and preoperative New York Heart Association class IV were found to be predictors of poor survival. All patients who underwent operation primarily for effusion with associated pain are alive and have improved functional capacity without steroid use. We conclude that pericardiectomy can be performed with low mortality and can result in good long-term survival and improved functional capacity. Patients who are seen primarily with pain refractory to steroid therapy can be relieved of symptoms with operation.

AB - A retrospective analysis of the records of 60 patients who underwent pericardiectomy over a 10-year period (1980 to 1990) at The Johns Hopkins Hospital was performed. Indications for operation were effusive disease in 24 patients and constriction in 36 patients. Six patients (10%) with pericardial effusion had pain as the primary symptom necessitating intervention. The operative approach for pericardiectomy was median sternotomy in 52 patients (4 patients required cardiopulmonary bypass) and left anterior thoracotomy in 8 patients. Nine patients (5 with constriction and 4 with effusion) with a prior limited pericardial procedure required formal pericardiectomy. The operative mortality rate for pericardial effusion and constriction was 4.2% and 5.6%, respectively. Follow-up (median follow-up, 56.9 ± 38.2 months) was obtained on 56 patients (93.3%). Actuarial survival at 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years for all patients was 82.1% ± 5.1%, 71.7% ± 6.7%, and 59.8% ± 12.2%, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed using 20 clinical variables. A history of malignancy, previous pericardial procedure, and preoperative New York Heart Association class IV were found to be predictors of poor survival. All patients who underwent operation primarily for effusion with associated pain are alive and have improved functional capacity without steroid use. We conclude that pericardiectomy can be performed with low mortality and can result in good long-term survival and improved functional capacity. Patients who are seen primarily with pain refractory to steroid therapy can be relieved of symptoms with operation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025822779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025822779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0003-4975(91)91339-W

DO - 10.1016/0003-4975(91)91339-W

M3 - Article

C2 - 1863142

AN - SCOPUS:0025822779

VL - 52

SP - 219

EP - 224

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 2

ER -