Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application

David A. Cook, Thomas J. Beckman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

644 Scopus citations

Abstract

Validity and reliability relate to the interpretation of scores from psychometric instruments (eg, symptom scales, questionnaires, education tests, and observer ratings) used in clinical practice, research, education, and administration. Emerging paradigms replace prior distinctions of face, content, and criterion validity with the unitary concept "construct validity," the degree to which a score can be interpreted as representing the intended underlying construct. Evidence to support the validity argument is collected from 5 sources: • Content: do instrument items completely represent the construct? • Response process: the relationship between the intended construct and the thought processes of subjects or observers • Internal structure: acceptable reliability and factor structure • Relations to other variables: correlation with scores from another instrument assessing the same construct • Consequences: do scores really make a difference? Evidence should be sought from a variety of sources to support a given interpretation. Reliable scores are necessary, but not sufficient, for valid interpretation. Increased attention to the systematic collection of validity evidence for scores from psychometric instruments will improve assessments in research, patient care, and education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166.e7-166.e16
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Volume119
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Keywords

  • Construct validity
  • Educational measurement
  • Medical education
  • Quality of life
  • Questionnaire
  • Reproducibility of results

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this