CT metal artifact reduction in the spine: Can an iterative reconstruction technique improve visualization?

A. L. Kotsenas, G. J. Michalak, D. R. DeLone, F. E. Diehn, K. Grant, A. F. Halaweish, A. Krauss, R. Raupach, B. Schmidt, Cynthia H McCollough, Joel Garland Fletcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metal-related artifacts from spine instrumentation can obscure relevant anatomy and pathology. We evaluated the ability of CT images reconstructed with and without iterative metal artifact reduction to visualize critical anatomic structures in postoperative spines and assessed the potential for implementation into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We archived CT projection data in patients with instrumented spinal fusion. CT images were reconstructed by using weighted filtered back-projection and iterative metal artifact reduction. Two neuroradiologists evaluated images in the region of spinal hardware and assigned a score for the visualization of critical anatomic structures by using soft-tissue and bone windows (critical structures totally obscured, n = 0; anatomic recognition with high diagnostic confidence, n = 5). Using bone windows, we measured the length of the most pronounced linear artifacts. For each patient, neuroradiologists made recommendations regarding the optimal use of iterative metal artifact reduction and its impact on diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Visualization of critical soft-tissue anatomic structures was significantly improved by using iterative metal artifact reduction compared with weighted filtered back-projection (median, 1 ± 1.5 versus 3 ± 1.3, P <.001), with improvement in the worst visualized anatomic structure in 88% (60/68) of patients. There was not significant improvement in visualization of critical osseous structures. Linear metal artifacts were reduced from 29 to 11 mm (P <.001). In 87% of patients, neuroradiologists recommended reconstructing iterative metal artifact reduction images instead of weighted filtered back-projection images, with definite improvement in diagnostic confidence in 32% (22/68). CONCLUSIONS: Iterative metal artifact reduction improves visualization of critical soft-tissue structures in patients with spinal hardware. Routine generation of these images in addition to routine weighted filtered back-projection is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2184-2190
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume36
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Artifacts
Spine
Metals
Bone and Bones
Spinal Fusion
Anatomy
Pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

CT metal artifact reduction in the spine : Can an iterative reconstruction technique improve visualization? / Kotsenas, A. L.; Michalak, G. J.; DeLone, D. R.; Diehn, F. E.; Grant, K.; Halaweish, A. F.; Krauss, A.; Raupach, R.; Schmidt, B.; McCollough, Cynthia H; Fletcher, Joel Garland.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 36, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 2184-2190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kotsenas, AL, Michalak, GJ, DeLone, DR, Diehn, FE, Grant, K, Halaweish, AF, Krauss, A, Raupach, R, Schmidt, B, McCollough, CH & Fletcher, JG 2015, 'CT metal artifact reduction in the spine: Can an iterative reconstruction technique improve visualization?', American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2184-2190. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4416
Kotsenas, A. L. ; Michalak, G. J. ; DeLone, D. R. ; Diehn, F. E. ; Grant, K. ; Halaweish, A. F. ; Krauss, A. ; Raupach, R. ; Schmidt, B. ; McCollough, Cynthia H ; Fletcher, Joel Garland. / CT metal artifact reduction in the spine : Can an iterative reconstruction technique improve visualization?. In: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2015 ; Vol. 36, No. 11. pp. 2184-2190.
@article{4066406d5d9546d1a9b5d21b64946656,
title = "CT metal artifact reduction in the spine: Can an iterative reconstruction technique improve visualization?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metal-related artifacts from spine instrumentation can obscure relevant anatomy and pathology. We evaluated the ability of CT images reconstructed with and without iterative metal artifact reduction to visualize critical anatomic structures in postoperative spines and assessed the potential for implementation into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We archived CT projection data in patients with instrumented spinal fusion. CT images were reconstructed by using weighted filtered back-projection and iterative metal artifact reduction. Two neuroradiologists evaluated images in the region of spinal hardware and assigned a score for the visualization of critical anatomic structures by using soft-tissue and bone windows (critical structures totally obscured, n = 0; anatomic recognition with high diagnostic confidence, n = 5). Using bone windows, we measured the length of the most pronounced linear artifacts. For each patient, neuroradiologists made recommendations regarding the optimal use of iterative metal artifact reduction and its impact on diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Visualization of critical soft-tissue anatomic structures was significantly improved by using iterative metal artifact reduction compared with weighted filtered back-projection (median, 1 ± 1.5 versus 3 ± 1.3, P <.001), with improvement in the worst visualized anatomic structure in 88{\%} (60/68) of patients. There was not significant improvement in visualization of critical osseous structures. Linear metal artifacts were reduced from 29 to 11 mm (P <.001). In 87{\%} of patients, neuroradiologists recommended reconstructing iterative metal artifact reduction images instead of weighted filtered back-projection images, with definite improvement in diagnostic confidence in 32{\%} (22/68). CONCLUSIONS: Iterative metal artifact reduction improves visualization of critical soft-tissue structures in patients with spinal hardware. Routine generation of these images in addition to routine weighted filtered back-projection is recommended.",
author = "Kotsenas, {A. L.} and Michalak, {G. J.} and DeLone, {D. R.} and Diehn, {F. E.} and K. Grant and Halaweish, {A. F.} and A. Krauss and R. Raupach and B. Schmidt and McCollough, {Cynthia H} and Fletcher, {Joel Garland}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3174/ajnr.A4416",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2184--2190",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CT metal artifact reduction in the spine

T2 - Can an iterative reconstruction technique improve visualization?

AU - Kotsenas, A. L.

AU - Michalak, G. J.

AU - DeLone, D. R.

AU - Diehn, F. E.

AU - Grant, K.

AU - Halaweish, A. F.

AU - Krauss, A.

AU - Raupach, R.

AU - Schmidt, B.

AU - McCollough, Cynthia H

AU - Fletcher, Joel Garland

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metal-related artifacts from spine instrumentation can obscure relevant anatomy and pathology. We evaluated the ability of CT images reconstructed with and without iterative metal artifact reduction to visualize critical anatomic structures in postoperative spines and assessed the potential for implementation into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We archived CT projection data in patients with instrumented spinal fusion. CT images were reconstructed by using weighted filtered back-projection and iterative metal artifact reduction. Two neuroradiologists evaluated images in the region of spinal hardware and assigned a score for the visualization of critical anatomic structures by using soft-tissue and bone windows (critical structures totally obscured, n = 0; anatomic recognition with high diagnostic confidence, n = 5). Using bone windows, we measured the length of the most pronounced linear artifacts. For each patient, neuroradiologists made recommendations regarding the optimal use of iterative metal artifact reduction and its impact on diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Visualization of critical soft-tissue anatomic structures was significantly improved by using iterative metal artifact reduction compared with weighted filtered back-projection (median, 1 ± 1.5 versus 3 ± 1.3, P <.001), with improvement in the worst visualized anatomic structure in 88% (60/68) of patients. There was not significant improvement in visualization of critical osseous structures. Linear metal artifacts were reduced from 29 to 11 mm (P <.001). In 87% of patients, neuroradiologists recommended reconstructing iterative metal artifact reduction images instead of weighted filtered back-projection images, with definite improvement in diagnostic confidence in 32% (22/68). CONCLUSIONS: Iterative metal artifact reduction improves visualization of critical soft-tissue structures in patients with spinal hardware. Routine generation of these images in addition to routine weighted filtered back-projection is recommended.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metal-related artifacts from spine instrumentation can obscure relevant anatomy and pathology. We evaluated the ability of CT images reconstructed with and without iterative metal artifact reduction to visualize critical anatomic structures in postoperative spines and assessed the potential for implementation into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We archived CT projection data in patients with instrumented spinal fusion. CT images were reconstructed by using weighted filtered back-projection and iterative metal artifact reduction. Two neuroradiologists evaluated images in the region of spinal hardware and assigned a score for the visualization of critical anatomic structures by using soft-tissue and bone windows (critical structures totally obscured, n = 0; anatomic recognition with high diagnostic confidence, n = 5). Using bone windows, we measured the length of the most pronounced linear artifacts. For each patient, neuroradiologists made recommendations regarding the optimal use of iterative metal artifact reduction and its impact on diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Visualization of critical soft-tissue anatomic structures was significantly improved by using iterative metal artifact reduction compared with weighted filtered back-projection (median, 1 ± 1.5 versus 3 ± 1.3, P <.001), with improvement in the worst visualized anatomic structure in 88% (60/68) of patients. There was not significant improvement in visualization of critical osseous structures. Linear metal artifacts were reduced from 29 to 11 mm (P <.001). In 87% of patients, neuroradiologists recommended reconstructing iterative metal artifact reduction images instead of weighted filtered back-projection images, with definite improvement in diagnostic confidence in 32% (22/68). CONCLUSIONS: Iterative metal artifact reduction improves visualization of critical soft-tissue structures in patients with spinal hardware. Routine generation of these images in addition to routine weighted filtered back-projection is recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947423845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947423845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A4416

DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A4416

M3 - Article

C2 - 26251433

AN - SCOPUS:84947423845

VL - 36

SP - 2184

EP - 2190

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 11

ER -