TY - JOUR
T1 - Cryotherapy for persistent Barrett's esophagus after radiofrequency ablation
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Visrodia, Kavel
AU - Zakko, Liam
AU - Singh, Siddharth
AU - Leggett, Cadman L.
AU - Iyer, Prasad G.
AU - Wang, Kenneth K.
N1 - Funding Information:
DISCLOSURE: The authors acknowledge the support of NCI U01 CA182940 and U54 CA163004 as well as support from the Van Cleve development fund (K. Wang). P. Iyer received research support from Exact Sciences, Symple Surgical, Medtronic, and Intromedic. Dr Iyer is a consultant for Medtronic. K. Wang received research support from CSA medical and C2 therapeutics. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Background and Aims: A small but significant proportion of patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) have persistent dysplasia or intestinal metaplasia (IM) after treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Cryotherapy is a cold-based ablative modality that is increasingly being used in this setting. We aimed to better understand the efficacy of second-line cryotherapy in patients with BE who have persistent dysplasia or IM after RFA by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Science through September 1, 2017. Articles were included for meta-analysis based on the following inclusion criteria: ≥5 patients with BE treated with RFA had persistent dysplasia or IM; they subsequently underwent ≥1 session of cryotherapy with follow-up endoscopy; the proportions of patients achieving complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and/or IM (CE-IM) were reported. The main outcomes were pooled proportions of CE-D and CE-IM by using a random effects model. Results: Eleven studies making up 148 patients with BE treated with cryotherapy for persistent dysplasia or IM after RFA were included. The pooled proportion of CE-D was 76.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.7-88.0), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 62%). The pooled proportion of CE-IM was 45.9% (95% CI, 32.0-60.5) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 57%). Multiple preplanned subgroup analyses did not sufficiently explain the heterogeneity. Adverse effects were reported in 6.7% of patients. Conclusion: Cryotherapy successfully achieved CE-D in three fourths and CE-IM in half of patients with BE who did not respond to initial RFA. Considering its favorable safety profile, cryotherapy may be a viable second-line option for this therapeutically challenging cohort of patients with BE, but higher-quality studies validating this remain warranted.
AB - Background and Aims: A small but significant proportion of patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) have persistent dysplasia or intestinal metaplasia (IM) after treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Cryotherapy is a cold-based ablative modality that is increasingly being used in this setting. We aimed to better understand the efficacy of second-line cryotherapy in patients with BE who have persistent dysplasia or IM after RFA by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Science through September 1, 2017. Articles were included for meta-analysis based on the following inclusion criteria: ≥5 patients with BE treated with RFA had persistent dysplasia or IM; they subsequently underwent ≥1 session of cryotherapy with follow-up endoscopy; the proportions of patients achieving complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and/or IM (CE-IM) were reported. The main outcomes were pooled proportions of CE-D and CE-IM by using a random effects model. Results: Eleven studies making up 148 patients with BE treated with cryotherapy for persistent dysplasia or IM after RFA were included. The pooled proportion of CE-D was 76.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.7-88.0), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 62%). The pooled proportion of CE-IM was 45.9% (95% CI, 32.0-60.5) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 57%). Multiple preplanned subgroup analyses did not sufficiently explain the heterogeneity. Adverse effects were reported in 6.7% of patients. Conclusion: Cryotherapy successfully achieved CE-D in three fourths and CE-IM in half of patients with BE who did not respond to initial RFA. Considering its favorable safety profile, cryotherapy may be a viable second-line option for this therapeutically challenging cohort of patients with BE, but higher-quality studies validating this remain warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047113509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047113509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.021
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.021
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29476849
AN - SCOPUS:85047113509
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 87
SP - 1396-1404.e1
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 6
ER -