Cross-vendor validation of liver magnetic resonance elastography

Suraj D. Serai, Meng Yin, Hui Wang, Richard Lorne Ehman, Daniel J. Podberesky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and validate the reproducibility of MR Elastography (MRE)-derived liver stiffness values on two different MR vendor platforms performed on the same subject on the same day. Methods: This investigation was approved by the hospital IRB. MRE exams were performed twice in identical fashion in eight volunteers and in five clinical patients on two different 1.5 T MR scanners—once on a Philips MR scanner and immediately afterward in back-to-back fashion on a General Electric MR scanner, or vice versa. All scan parameters were kept identical on the two platforms to the best extent possible. After the MRE magnitude and phase images were obtained, the data were converted into quantitative images displaying the stiffness of the liver parenchyma. Mean liver stiffness values between the two platforms were compared using interclass correlation with a p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value of 0.994 was obtained for 13 subjects with p value <0.001 indicating a significantly positive correlation. Conclusion: As MRE gains in acceptance and as its availability becomes more widespread, it is important to ascertain and confirm that liver stiffness values obtained on different MRE vendor platforms are consistent and reproducible. In this small pilot investigation, we demonstrate that liver stiffness measurement with MRE is reproducible and has very good consistency across two vendor platforms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)789-794
Number of pages6
JournalAbdominal Imaging
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 5 2014

Fingerprint

Elasticity Imaging Techniques
Liver
Research Ethics Committees
Volunteers

Keywords

  • Liver elastography
  • MRE
  • MRE validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Cross-vendor validation of liver magnetic resonance elastography. / Serai, Suraj D.; Yin, Meng; Wang, Hui; Ehman, Richard Lorne; Podberesky, Daniel J.

In: Abdominal Imaging, Vol. 40, No. 4, 05.12.2014, p. 789-794.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Serai, Suraj D. ; Yin, Meng ; Wang, Hui ; Ehman, Richard Lorne ; Podberesky, Daniel J. / Cross-vendor validation of liver magnetic resonance elastography. In: Abdominal Imaging. 2014 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 789-794.
@article{1571aa4f846d423fa68102ae04cdec53,
title = "Cross-vendor validation of liver magnetic resonance elastography",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate and validate the reproducibility of MR Elastography (MRE)-derived liver stiffness values on two different MR vendor platforms performed on the same subject on the same day. Methods: This investigation was approved by the hospital IRB. MRE exams were performed twice in identical fashion in eight volunteers and in five clinical patients on two different 1.5 T MR scanners—once on a Philips MR scanner and immediately afterward in back-to-back fashion on a General Electric MR scanner, or vice versa. All scan parameters were kept identical on the two platforms to the best extent possible. After the MRE magnitude and phase images were obtained, the data were converted into quantitative images displaying the stiffness of the liver parenchyma. Mean liver stiffness values between the two platforms were compared using interclass correlation with a p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value of 0.994 was obtained for 13 subjects with p value <0.001 indicating a significantly positive correlation. Conclusion: As MRE gains in acceptance and as its availability becomes more widespread, it is important to ascertain and confirm that liver stiffness values obtained on different MRE vendor platforms are consistent and reproducible. In this small pilot investigation, we demonstrate that liver stiffness measurement with MRE is reproducible and has very good consistency across two vendor platforms.",
keywords = "Liver elastography, MRE, MRE validation",
author = "Serai, {Suraj D.} and Meng Yin and Hui Wang and Ehman, {Richard Lorne} and Podberesky, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s00261-014-0282-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "789--794",
journal = "Abdominal Radiology",
issn = "2366-004X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-vendor validation of liver magnetic resonance elastography

AU - Serai, Suraj D.

AU - Yin, Meng

AU - Wang, Hui

AU - Ehman, Richard Lorne

AU - Podberesky, Daniel J.

PY - 2014/12/5

Y1 - 2014/12/5

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate and validate the reproducibility of MR Elastography (MRE)-derived liver stiffness values on two different MR vendor platforms performed on the same subject on the same day. Methods: This investigation was approved by the hospital IRB. MRE exams were performed twice in identical fashion in eight volunteers and in five clinical patients on two different 1.5 T MR scanners—once on a Philips MR scanner and immediately afterward in back-to-back fashion on a General Electric MR scanner, or vice versa. All scan parameters were kept identical on the two platforms to the best extent possible. After the MRE magnitude and phase images were obtained, the data were converted into quantitative images displaying the stiffness of the liver parenchyma. Mean liver stiffness values between the two platforms were compared using interclass correlation with a p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value of 0.994 was obtained for 13 subjects with p value <0.001 indicating a significantly positive correlation. Conclusion: As MRE gains in acceptance and as its availability becomes more widespread, it is important to ascertain and confirm that liver stiffness values obtained on different MRE vendor platforms are consistent and reproducible. In this small pilot investigation, we demonstrate that liver stiffness measurement with MRE is reproducible and has very good consistency across two vendor platforms.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate and validate the reproducibility of MR Elastography (MRE)-derived liver stiffness values on two different MR vendor platforms performed on the same subject on the same day. Methods: This investigation was approved by the hospital IRB. MRE exams were performed twice in identical fashion in eight volunteers and in five clinical patients on two different 1.5 T MR scanners—once on a Philips MR scanner and immediately afterward in back-to-back fashion on a General Electric MR scanner, or vice versa. All scan parameters were kept identical on the two platforms to the best extent possible. After the MRE magnitude and phase images were obtained, the data were converted into quantitative images displaying the stiffness of the liver parenchyma. Mean liver stiffness values between the two platforms were compared using interclass correlation with a p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value of 0.994 was obtained for 13 subjects with p value <0.001 indicating a significantly positive correlation. Conclusion: As MRE gains in acceptance and as its availability becomes more widespread, it is important to ascertain and confirm that liver stiffness values obtained on different MRE vendor platforms are consistent and reproducible. In this small pilot investigation, we demonstrate that liver stiffness measurement with MRE is reproducible and has very good consistency across two vendor platforms.

KW - Liver elastography

KW - MRE

KW - MRE validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939952892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939952892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-014-0282-y

DO - 10.1007/s00261-014-0282-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 25476489

AN - SCOPUS:84939952892

VL - 40

SP - 789

EP - 794

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

SN - 2366-004X

IS - 4

ER -