Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: Tools to improve the value of emergency care

Jeremiah D. Schuur, Christopher W. Baugh, Erik P. Hess, Joshua A. Hilton, Jesse M. Pines, Brent R. Asplin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The decision to admit a patient to the hospital after an emergency department (ED) visit is expensive, frequently not evidence-based, and variable. Outpatient critical pathways are a promising approach to reduce hospital admission after emergency care. Critical pathways exist to risk stratify patients for potentially serious diagnoses (e.g., acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) or evaluate response to therapy (e.g., community-acquired pneumonia) within a short time period (i.e., less than 36 hours), to determine if further hospital-based acute care is needed. Yet, such pathways are variably used while many patients are admitted for conditions for which they could be treated as outpatients. In this article, the authors propose a model of post-ED critical pathways, describe their role in emergency care, list common diagnoses that are amenable to critical pathways in the outpatient setting, and propose a research agenda to address barriers and solutions to increase the use of outpatient critical pathways. If emergency providers are to routinely conduct rapid evaluations in outpatient or observation settings, they must have several conditions at their disposal: 1) evidence-based tools to accurately risk stratify patients for protocolized care, 2) systems of care that reliably facilitate workup in the outpatient setting, and 3) a medical environment conducive to noninpatient pathways, with aligned risks and incentives among patients, providers, and payers. Increased use of critical pathways after emergency care is a potential way to improve the value of emergency care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Critical Pathways
Emergency Medical Services
Emergencies
Outpatients
Hospital Emergency Service
Therapeutics
Motivation
Pneumonia
Patient Care
Myocardial Infarction
Observation
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment : Tools to improve the value of emergency care. / Schuur, Jeremiah D.; Baugh, Christopher W.; Hess, Erik P.; Hilton, Joshua A.; Pines, Jesse M.; Asplin, Brent R.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 6, 06.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schuur, Jeremiah D. ; Baugh, Christopher W. ; Hess, Erik P. ; Hilton, Joshua A. ; Pines, Jesse M. ; Asplin, Brent R. / Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment : Tools to improve the value of emergency care. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 18, No. 6.
@article{b9bb0d70d55c4cadb6f1c45d0ff9446b,
title = "Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: Tools to improve the value of emergency care",
abstract = "The decision to admit a patient to the hospital after an emergency department (ED) visit is expensive, frequently not evidence-based, and variable. Outpatient critical pathways are a promising approach to reduce hospital admission after emergency care. Critical pathways exist to risk stratify patients for potentially serious diagnoses (e.g., acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) or evaluate response to therapy (e.g., community-acquired pneumonia) within a short time period (i.e., less than 36 hours), to determine if further hospital-based acute care is needed. Yet, such pathways are variably used while many patients are admitted for conditions for which they could be treated as outpatients. In this article, the authors propose a model of post-ED critical pathways, describe their role in emergency care, list common diagnoses that are amenable to critical pathways in the outpatient setting, and propose a research agenda to address barriers and solutions to increase the use of outpatient critical pathways. If emergency providers are to routinely conduct rapid evaluations in outpatient or observation settings, they must have several conditions at their disposal: 1) evidence-based tools to accurately risk stratify patients for protocolized care, 2) systems of care that reliably facilitate workup in the outpatient setting, and 3) a medical environment conducive to noninpatient pathways, with aligned risks and incentives among patients, providers, and payers. Increased use of critical pathways after emergency care is a potential way to improve the value of emergency care.",
author = "Schuur, {Jeremiah D.} and Baugh, {Christopher W.} and Hess, {Erik P.} and Hilton, {Joshua A.} and Pines, {Jesse M.} and Asplin, {Brent R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01096.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment

T2 - Tools to improve the value of emergency care

AU - Schuur, Jeremiah D.

AU - Baugh, Christopher W.

AU - Hess, Erik P.

AU - Hilton, Joshua A.

AU - Pines, Jesse M.

AU - Asplin, Brent R.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - The decision to admit a patient to the hospital after an emergency department (ED) visit is expensive, frequently not evidence-based, and variable. Outpatient critical pathways are a promising approach to reduce hospital admission after emergency care. Critical pathways exist to risk stratify patients for potentially serious diagnoses (e.g., acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) or evaluate response to therapy (e.g., community-acquired pneumonia) within a short time period (i.e., less than 36 hours), to determine if further hospital-based acute care is needed. Yet, such pathways are variably used while many patients are admitted for conditions for which they could be treated as outpatients. In this article, the authors propose a model of post-ED critical pathways, describe their role in emergency care, list common diagnoses that are amenable to critical pathways in the outpatient setting, and propose a research agenda to address barriers and solutions to increase the use of outpatient critical pathways. If emergency providers are to routinely conduct rapid evaluations in outpatient or observation settings, they must have several conditions at their disposal: 1) evidence-based tools to accurately risk stratify patients for protocolized care, 2) systems of care that reliably facilitate workup in the outpatient setting, and 3) a medical environment conducive to noninpatient pathways, with aligned risks and incentives among patients, providers, and payers. Increased use of critical pathways after emergency care is a potential way to improve the value of emergency care.

AB - The decision to admit a patient to the hospital after an emergency department (ED) visit is expensive, frequently not evidence-based, and variable. Outpatient critical pathways are a promising approach to reduce hospital admission after emergency care. Critical pathways exist to risk stratify patients for potentially serious diagnoses (e.g., acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) or evaluate response to therapy (e.g., community-acquired pneumonia) within a short time period (i.e., less than 36 hours), to determine if further hospital-based acute care is needed. Yet, such pathways are variably used while many patients are admitted for conditions for which they could be treated as outpatients. In this article, the authors propose a model of post-ED critical pathways, describe their role in emergency care, list common diagnoses that are amenable to critical pathways in the outpatient setting, and propose a research agenda to address barriers and solutions to increase the use of outpatient critical pathways. If emergency providers are to routinely conduct rapid evaluations in outpatient or observation settings, they must have several conditions at their disposal: 1) evidence-based tools to accurately risk stratify patients for protocolized care, 2) systems of care that reliably facilitate workup in the outpatient setting, and 3) a medical environment conducive to noninpatient pathways, with aligned risks and incentives among patients, providers, and payers. Increased use of critical pathways after emergency care is a potential way to improve the value of emergency care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959317539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959317539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01096.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01096.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21676050

AN - SCOPUS:79959317539

VL - 18

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 6

ER -