Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in an employee population

A retrospective analysis

Bijan J Borah, James M Naessens, Amy E. Glasgow, Brent A Bauer, Tony Y. Chon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective adjunct to usual care for Mayo Clinic employees and their dependents experiencing pain symptoms. Design Retrospective review of the medical and billing records of 466 employee-patients and their dependents who had received acupuncture as part of their care and 466 propensity score–matched control patients. Interventions Usual care in combination with acupuncture compared with usual care alone. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the total costs of care for all medical care and pharmacy services incurred from 1 year before the index visit to 14 months after the index date. Secondary outcomes included the number of hospital visits, total inpatient days, emergency department visits, primary care or general medicine office visits, specialty office visits, and physical therapy services. Pain scores (patient-rated scores from 0 to 10) were extracted from the medical record, if available. Results Costs of care were similar between the 2 groups. No cost savings were noted for the acupuncture group. Conclusions Several limitations to the study may have precluded a finding of cost-effectiveness. Future studies should include prospective evaluation of costs and other outcomes in a comparison between acupuncture and usual care in a randomized control trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-19
Number of pages6
JournalComplementary Therapies in Medicine
Volume31
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Acupuncture
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Office Visits
Population
Costs and Cost Analysis
Medical Records
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pain
Pharmaceutical Services
Cost Savings
Health Care Costs
Hospital Emergency Service
Inpatients
Primary Health Care
Medicine

Keywords

  • Acupuncture
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Employee health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and Manual Therapy
  • Complementary and alternative medicine
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in an employee population : A retrospective analysis. / Borah, Bijan J; Naessens, James M; Glasgow, Amy E.; Bauer, Brent A; Chon, Tony Y.

In: Complementary Therapies in Medicine, Vol. 31, 01.04.2017, p. 14-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b8d591f11f1d4e1cba5b9077b1f15f9e,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in an employee population: A retrospective analysis",
abstract = "Objectives To determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective adjunct to usual care for Mayo Clinic employees and their dependents experiencing pain symptoms. Design Retrospective review of the medical and billing records of 466 employee-patients and their dependents who had received acupuncture as part of their care and 466 propensity score–matched control patients. Interventions Usual care in combination with acupuncture compared with usual care alone. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the total costs of care for all medical care and pharmacy services incurred from 1 year before the index visit to 14 months after the index date. Secondary outcomes included the number of hospital visits, total inpatient days, emergency department visits, primary care or general medicine office visits, specialty office visits, and physical therapy services. Pain scores (patient-rated scores from 0 to 10) were extracted from the medical record, if available. Results Costs of care were similar between the 2 groups. No cost savings were noted for the acupuncture group. Conclusions Several limitations to the study may have precluded a finding of cost-effectiveness. Future studies should include prospective evaluation of costs and other outcomes in a comparison between acupuncture and usual care in a randomized control trial.",
keywords = "Acupuncture, Cost-effectiveness, Employee health",
author = "Borah, {Bijan J} and Naessens, {James M} and Glasgow, {Amy E.} and Bauer, {Brent A} and Chon, {Tony Y.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ctim.2017.01.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "14--19",
journal = "Complementary Therapies in Medicine",
issn = "0965-2299",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in an employee population

T2 - A retrospective analysis

AU - Borah, Bijan J

AU - Naessens, James M

AU - Glasgow, Amy E.

AU - Bauer, Brent A

AU - Chon, Tony Y.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Objectives To determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective adjunct to usual care for Mayo Clinic employees and their dependents experiencing pain symptoms. Design Retrospective review of the medical and billing records of 466 employee-patients and their dependents who had received acupuncture as part of their care and 466 propensity score–matched control patients. Interventions Usual care in combination with acupuncture compared with usual care alone. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the total costs of care for all medical care and pharmacy services incurred from 1 year before the index visit to 14 months after the index date. Secondary outcomes included the number of hospital visits, total inpatient days, emergency department visits, primary care or general medicine office visits, specialty office visits, and physical therapy services. Pain scores (patient-rated scores from 0 to 10) were extracted from the medical record, if available. Results Costs of care were similar between the 2 groups. No cost savings were noted for the acupuncture group. Conclusions Several limitations to the study may have precluded a finding of cost-effectiveness. Future studies should include prospective evaluation of costs and other outcomes in a comparison between acupuncture and usual care in a randomized control trial.

AB - Objectives To determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective adjunct to usual care for Mayo Clinic employees and their dependents experiencing pain symptoms. Design Retrospective review of the medical and billing records of 466 employee-patients and their dependents who had received acupuncture as part of their care and 466 propensity score–matched control patients. Interventions Usual care in combination with acupuncture compared with usual care alone. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the total costs of care for all medical care and pharmacy services incurred from 1 year before the index visit to 14 months after the index date. Secondary outcomes included the number of hospital visits, total inpatient days, emergency department visits, primary care or general medicine office visits, specialty office visits, and physical therapy services. Pain scores (patient-rated scores from 0 to 10) were extracted from the medical record, if available. Results Costs of care were similar between the 2 groups. No cost savings were noted for the acupuncture group. Conclusions Several limitations to the study may have precluded a finding of cost-effectiveness. Future studies should include prospective evaluation of costs and other outcomes in a comparison between acupuncture and usual care in a randomized control trial.

KW - Acupuncture

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Employee health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010867813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010867813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.01.002

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 14

EP - 19

JO - Complementary Therapies in Medicine

JF - Complementary Therapies in Medicine

SN - 0965-2299

ER -