Corrigendum to “Comparison of Balloon Guide Catheters and Standard Guide Catheters for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” [World Neurosurgery 154 (2021), 144-153] (World Neurosurgery (2021) 154 (144–153.e21), (S1878875021010299), (10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.034))

John M. Pederson, Natalie L. Reierson, Nicole Hardy, Jillienne C. Touchette, Sammy Medam, Averi Barrett, Megan Schmidt, Waleed Brinjikji, David F. Kallmes, Kevin M. Kallmes

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The authors regret that an error occurred in the Results Section, in subsection “First-Pass Effect” on page 146: Original statement with incorrect values: “The FPE rate for the BGC group was 49.1% (95% CI 35.6% – 62.8%) and for the non-BGC group was 37.3% (95% CI 26.4% – 49.6%).” The corrected statement should read as follows: “The FPE rate for the BGC group was 36.9% (95% CI 20.0% – 57.8%) and for the non-BGC group was 13.2% (95% CI 5.0% – 30.2%).” The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused. Kevin Kallmes, on behalf of all co-authors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149
Number of pages1
JournalWorld neurosurgery
Volume160
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Comparison of Balloon Guide Catheters and Standard Guide Catheters for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” [World Neurosurgery 154 (2021), 144-153] (World Neurosurgery (2021) 154 (144–153.e21), (S1878875021010299), (10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.034))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this