Controversies regarding laparoscopic colectomy for malignant diseases.

D. M. Ota, Heidi Nelson, J. C. Weeks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surgical investigators have shown that a hemicolectomy can be done laparoscopically. This minimally invasive approach to treat colon cancer potentially reduces hospitalization time, hastens return to normal activity, and reduces health care costs. Hopefully, all of these favorable outcomes can be achieved without compromising cancer control. At present, however, the issues regarding laparoscopic colectomy are not clear, and prospective studies are necessary to validate that this new procedure is superior to open colectomy. Because cancer control might be compromised by this new procedure, laparoscopic colectomy should not be accepted by the surgical community because of the allure of new technology or the hope that it is equivalent to open colectomy in controlling a curable disease. Rather, a randomized trial of laparoscopic colectomy compared with open colectomy is needed to prove that cancer control is not different and that laparoscopic colectomy is cost-effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)208-213
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent opinion in general surgery
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colectomy
Neoplasms
Health Care Costs
Colonic Neoplasms
Hospitalization
Research Personnel
Prospective Studies
Technology
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Controversies regarding laparoscopic colectomy for malignant diseases. / Ota, D. M.; Nelson, Heidi; Weeks, J. C.

In: Current opinion in general surgery, 1994, p. 208-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e44592e6f9bc4789b1fa3eb13129f71a,
title = "Controversies regarding laparoscopic colectomy for malignant diseases.",
abstract = "Surgical investigators have shown that a hemicolectomy can be done laparoscopically. This minimally invasive approach to treat colon cancer potentially reduces hospitalization time, hastens return to normal activity, and reduces health care costs. Hopefully, all of these favorable outcomes can be achieved without compromising cancer control. At present, however, the issues regarding laparoscopic colectomy are not clear, and prospective studies are necessary to validate that this new procedure is superior to open colectomy. Because cancer control might be compromised by this new procedure, laparoscopic colectomy should not be accepted by the surgical community because of the allure of new technology or the hope that it is equivalent to open colectomy in controlling a curable disease. Rather, a randomized trial of laparoscopic colectomy compared with open colectomy is needed to prove that cancer control is not different and that laparoscopic colectomy is cost-effective.",
author = "Ota, {D. M.} and Heidi Nelson and Weeks, {J. C.}",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "208--213",
journal = "Current opinion in general surgery",
issn = "1065-6243",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controversies regarding laparoscopic colectomy for malignant diseases.

AU - Ota, D. M.

AU - Nelson, Heidi

AU - Weeks, J. C.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Surgical investigators have shown that a hemicolectomy can be done laparoscopically. This minimally invasive approach to treat colon cancer potentially reduces hospitalization time, hastens return to normal activity, and reduces health care costs. Hopefully, all of these favorable outcomes can be achieved without compromising cancer control. At present, however, the issues regarding laparoscopic colectomy are not clear, and prospective studies are necessary to validate that this new procedure is superior to open colectomy. Because cancer control might be compromised by this new procedure, laparoscopic colectomy should not be accepted by the surgical community because of the allure of new technology or the hope that it is equivalent to open colectomy in controlling a curable disease. Rather, a randomized trial of laparoscopic colectomy compared with open colectomy is needed to prove that cancer control is not different and that laparoscopic colectomy is cost-effective.

AB - Surgical investigators have shown that a hemicolectomy can be done laparoscopically. This minimally invasive approach to treat colon cancer potentially reduces hospitalization time, hastens return to normal activity, and reduces health care costs. Hopefully, all of these favorable outcomes can be achieved without compromising cancer control. At present, however, the issues regarding laparoscopic colectomy are not clear, and prospective studies are necessary to validate that this new procedure is superior to open colectomy. Because cancer control might be compromised by this new procedure, laparoscopic colectomy should not be accepted by the surgical community because of the allure of new technology or the hope that it is equivalent to open colectomy in controlling a curable disease. Rather, a randomized trial of laparoscopic colectomy compared with open colectomy is needed to prove that cancer control is not different and that laparoscopic colectomy is cost-effective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028701090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028701090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7583971

AN - SCOPUS:0028701090

SP - 208

EP - 213

JO - Current opinion in general surgery

JF - Current opinion in general surgery

SN - 1065-6243

ER -