Contributions of imprecision in PET-MRI rigid registration to imprecision in amyloid PET SUVR measurements

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quantitative measurement of β-amyloid from amyloid PET scans typically relies on localizing target and reference regions by image registration to MRI. In this work, we present a series of simulations where 50 small random perturbations of starting location and orientation were applied to each subject's PET scan, and rigid registration using spm_coreg was performed between each perturbed PET scan and its corresponding MRI. We then measured variation in the output PET-MRI registrations and how this variation affected the resulting SUVR measurements. We performed these experiments using scans of 1196 participants, half using 18F florbetapir and half using 11C PiB. From these experiments, we measured the magnitude of the imprecision in the rigid registration steps used to localize measurement regions, and how this contributes to the overall imprecision in SUVR measurements. Unexpectedly, we found for both tracers that the imprecision in these measurements depends on the degree of amyloid tracer uptake, and thus also indirectly on Alzheimer's disease clinical status. We then examined common choices of reference regions, and we show that SUVR measurements using supratentorial white matter references are relatively resistant to this source of error. We also show that the use of partial volume correction further magnifies the effects of registration imprecision on SUVR measurements. Together, these results suggest that this rigid registration step is an attractive target for future work in improving measurement techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHuman Brain Mapping
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Amyloid
Positron-Emission Tomography
Alzheimer Disease
Research Design

Keywords

  • Alzheimer disease
  • Amyloid
  • Computer-assisted
  • Florbetapir
  • Image processing
  • Pittsburgh compound B
  • Positron-emission tomography
  • Reproducibility of results

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{e353b5f8ae004f94877a8838c5e80cc8,
title = "Contributions of imprecision in PET-MRI rigid registration to imprecision in amyloid PET SUVR measurements",
abstract = "Quantitative measurement of β-amyloid from amyloid PET scans typically relies on localizing target and reference regions by image registration to MRI. In this work, we present a series of simulations where 50 small random perturbations of starting location and orientation were applied to each subject's PET scan, and rigid registration using spm_coreg was performed between each perturbed PET scan and its corresponding MRI. We then measured variation in the output PET-MRI registrations and how this variation affected the resulting SUVR measurements. We performed these experiments using scans of 1196 participants, half using 18F florbetapir and half using 11C PiB. From these experiments, we measured the magnitude of the imprecision in the rigid registration steps used to localize measurement regions, and how this contributes to the overall imprecision in SUVR measurements. Unexpectedly, we found for both tracers that the imprecision in these measurements depends on the degree of amyloid tracer uptake, and thus also indirectly on Alzheimer's disease clinical status. We then examined common choices of reference regions, and we show that SUVR measurements using supratentorial white matter references are relatively resistant to this source of error. We also show that the use of partial volume correction further magnifies the effects of registration imprecision on SUVR measurements. Together, these results suggest that this rigid registration step is an attractive target for future work in improving measurement techniques.",
keywords = "Alzheimer disease, Amyloid, Computer-assisted, Florbetapir, Image processing, Pittsburgh compound B, Positron-emission tomography, Reproducibility of results",
author = "Christopher Schwarz and Jones, {David T} and Gunter, {Jeffrey L.} and Val Lowe and Vemuri, {Prashanthi D} and Senjem, {Matthew L.} and Petersen, {Ronald Carl} and Knopman, {David S} and Jack, {Clifford R Jr.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/hbm.23622",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Human Brain Mapping",
issn = "1065-9471",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contributions of imprecision in PET-MRI rigid registration to imprecision in amyloid PET SUVR measurements

AU - Schwarz, Christopher

AU - Jones, David T

AU - Gunter, Jeffrey L.

AU - Lowe, Val

AU - Vemuri, Prashanthi D

AU - Senjem, Matthew L.

AU - Petersen, Ronald Carl

AU - Knopman, David S

AU - Jack, Clifford R Jr.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Quantitative measurement of β-amyloid from amyloid PET scans typically relies on localizing target and reference regions by image registration to MRI. In this work, we present a series of simulations where 50 small random perturbations of starting location and orientation were applied to each subject's PET scan, and rigid registration using spm_coreg was performed between each perturbed PET scan and its corresponding MRI. We then measured variation in the output PET-MRI registrations and how this variation affected the resulting SUVR measurements. We performed these experiments using scans of 1196 participants, half using 18F florbetapir and half using 11C PiB. From these experiments, we measured the magnitude of the imprecision in the rigid registration steps used to localize measurement regions, and how this contributes to the overall imprecision in SUVR measurements. Unexpectedly, we found for both tracers that the imprecision in these measurements depends on the degree of amyloid tracer uptake, and thus also indirectly on Alzheimer's disease clinical status. We then examined common choices of reference regions, and we show that SUVR measurements using supratentorial white matter references are relatively resistant to this source of error. We also show that the use of partial volume correction further magnifies the effects of registration imprecision on SUVR measurements. Together, these results suggest that this rigid registration step is an attractive target for future work in improving measurement techniques.

AB - Quantitative measurement of β-amyloid from amyloid PET scans typically relies on localizing target and reference regions by image registration to MRI. In this work, we present a series of simulations where 50 small random perturbations of starting location and orientation were applied to each subject's PET scan, and rigid registration using spm_coreg was performed between each perturbed PET scan and its corresponding MRI. We then measured variation in the output PET-MRI registrations and how this variation affected the resulting SUVR measurements. We performed these experiments using scans of 1196 participants, half using 18F florbetapir and half using 11C PiB. From these experiments, we measured the magnitude of the imprecision in the rigid registration steps used to localize measurement regions, and how this contributes to the overall imprecision in SUVR measurements. Unexpectedly, we found for both tracers that the imprecision in these measurements depends on the degree of amyloid tracer uptake, and thus also indirectly on Alzheimer's disease clinical status. We then examined common choices of reference regions, and we show that SUVR measurements using supratentorial white matter references are relatively resistant to this source of error. We also show that the use of partial volume correction further magnifies the effects of registration imprecision on SUVR measurements. Together, these results suggest that this rigid registration step is an attractive target for future work in improving measurement techniques.

KW - Alzheimer disease

KW - Amyloid

KW - Computer-assisted

KW - Florbetapir

KW - Image processing

KW - Pittsburgh compound B

KW - Positron-emission tomography

KW - Reproducibility of results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018654039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018654039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hbm.23622

DO - 10.1002/hbm.23622

M3 - Article

JO - Human Brain Mapping

JF - Human Brain Mapping

SN - 1065-9471

ER -