Contrast of response to dacarbazine, mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (DMAP) plus GM-CSF between patients with advanced malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors and patients with other advanced leiomyosarcomas

John H. Edmonson, Randolph S. Marks, Jan C. Buckner, Michelle R. Mahoney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

95 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Previous observations have suggested that leiomyosarcomas, and especially gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas, may be less responsive to cancer chemotherapy than other histologic types of non-osseous sarcomas; however, this difference has not been characterized well until quite recently, with the recognition of the special identity of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Prior to the general acceptance of this new histologic classification, we decided to study patients with gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas in concert with other leiomyosarcomas for relative responsivity to a combination cytotoxic regimen developed specifically for leiomyosarcomas. Patients and Methods. Adult patients with advanced leiomyosarcomas received intravenous chemotherapy as outpatients with dacarbazine 750 μg/m2, mitomycin 6 mg/m 2, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2, and cisplatin 60 mg/m 2 on day 0, with granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF, sargramostim) 250 mcg/m2 given SC every 12 hr on days -6 to -3 and on days 1-14 of each 4-week treatment cycle. Our original plan to escalate dacarbazine doses to 1000 mg/m2 following cycle one was abandoned after the first six patients because of toxicity. Results. We studied 21 patients with GIST and 18 patients with other types of leiomyosarcomas, for a total of 131 treatment cycles, with a median of four cycles per patient in each of the two groups of patients. Toxicity was significant, with 33% having grade 3 vomiting at some time during treatment. Grade 3 leukopenia occurred in 42%, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia was observed in 68% of our patients. In one patient, grade 4 pulmonary toxicity developed during the fourth cycle, and this was considered a major factor in her death. Objective tumor regression was observed in one of 21 (1.8%) (95%CI = 0-14.5%) GIST and in 11 of 18 (61%) (95%CI = 38-84%) other leiomyosarcomas, including eight of 10 uterine cases. In five cases, we interrupted chemotherapy to attempt complete surgical excision of residual tumor, and four of the patients were rendered apparently free of disease. Median survivals for the two groups have been similar with 16.7 months (95%CI = 8.8-27.5 months) for the GIST and 17.5 mos (95%CI = 10.9-35.3%) for the other leiomyosarcomas. Three patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas are still alive more than 2 years after completing this chemotherapy and subsequent secondary surgical excision (±irradiation) and two of them are free of disease. Conclusions. While this regimen is ineffective against GIST, its value against uterine leiomyosarcomas deserves further study in a larger population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)605-612
Number of pages8
JournalCancer Investigation
Volume20
Issue number5-6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Keywords

  • Chemotherapy
  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumor
  • Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor
  • Leiomyosarcoma
  • Ovarian sarcoma
  • Soft tissue sarcoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contrast of response to dacarbazine, mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (DMAP) plus GM-CSF between patients with advanced malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors and patients with other advanced leiomyosarcomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this