Continuous EMG recordings and intraoperative electrical stimulation for identification and protection of cervical nerve roots during foraminal tumor surgery

LanJun Guo, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, Charles D. Yingling, Philip R. Weinstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord function is now routinely monitored with somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during surgery for intraspinal cervical dumbbell and foraminal tumors. However, upper extremity nerve roots are also at risk during these procedures. Anatomic relations are frequently difficult to interpret because the nerve roots may be displaced by the tumor. We used electrical stimulation with compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recordings at multiple sites to identify the location and course of the involved nerve root and to provide real-time information regarding the functional status of the roots to predict postoperative outcome. METHODS: Ten patients were monitored during surgery for cervical dumbbell or foraminal tumors. SEPs and MEPs were monitored as a routine procedure. CMAPs were recorded from needle electrodes placed in the deltoid, biceps, triceps, and flexor carpi ulnaris muscles. Spontaneous electromyography (EMG) muscle activity was also continuously monitored. A handheld monopolar stimulation electrode was used to elicit evoked EMG responses to identify and trace the course of nerves in relation to the tumor. In four patients, the stimulation threshold was tested before and after tumor resection to predict postoperative nerve root function. RESULTS: Electrical stimulation with CMAP recording was successful in localizing nerve roots during tumor resection in all 10 patients. Monitoring predicted postoperative nerve root preservation after tumor removal in each case. It was possible to identify either by using low-level stimulation (<2.0 V) or by observing changes in spontaneous EMG amplitude if activation was present during surgical dissection. The monitoring of spontaneous muscle activity in response to direct or indirect surgical manipulation during tumor resection also provided continuous assessment of nerve root function and identified any physiologic disturbance induced by surgical manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation in the operating field and recording of CMAPs facilitated nerve root identification and predicted postoperative function during dissection and separation from ligamentous or neoplastic tissue in 10 patients. Electrical stimulation might also be useful to predict postoperative preservation of function when nerve root sacrifice is necessary and no motor response is detected intraoperatively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-42
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electromyography
Electric Stimulation
Neoplasms
Muscles
Motor Evoked Potentials
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Action Potentials
Dissection
Electrodes
Upper Extremity
Needles
Spinal Cord

Keywords

  • Cervical spine
  • Compound muscle action potential
  • Dumbbell tumor
  • Electrical stimulation
  • Electromyography
  • Intraoperative monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{e629aac8b36b4bc781db2476d839836c,
title = "Continuous EMG recordings and intraoperative electrical stimulation for identification and protection of cervical nerve roots during foraminal tumor surgery",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord function is now routinely monitored with somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during surgery for intraspinal cervical dumbbell and foraminal tumors. However, upper extremity nerve roots are also at risk during these procedures. Anatomic relations are frequently difficult to interpret because the nerve roots may be displaced by the tumor. We used electrical stimulation with compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recordings at multiple sites to identify the location and course of the involved nerve root and to provide real-time information regarding the functional status of the roots to predict postoperative outcome. METHODS: Ten patients were monitored during surgery for cervical dumbbell or foraminal tumors. SEPs and MEPs were monitored as a routine procedure. CMAPs were recorded from needle electrodes placed in the deltoid, biceps, triceps, and flexor carpi ulnaris muscles. Spontaneous electromyography (EMG) muscle activity was also continuously monitored. A handheld monopolar stimulation electrode was used to elicit evoked EMG responses to identify and trace the course of nerves in relation to the tumor. In four patients, the stimulation threshold was tested before and after tumor resection to predict postoperative nerve root function. RESULTS: Electrical stimulation with CMAP recording was successful in localizing nerve roots during tumor resection in all 10 patients. Monitoring predicted postoperative nerve root preservation after tumor removal in each case. It was possible to identify either by using low-level stimulation (<2.0 V) or by observing changes in spontaneous EMG amplitude if activation was present during surgical dissection. The monitoring of spontaneous muscle activity in response to direct or indirect surgical manipulation during tumor resection also provided continuous assessment of nerve root function and identified any physiologic disturbance induced by surgical manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation in the operating field and recording of CMAPs facilitated nerve root identification and predicted postoperative function during dissection and separation from ligamentous or neoplastic tissue in 10 patients. Electrical stimulation might also be useful to predict postoperative preservation of function when nerve root sacrifice is necessary and no motor response is detected intraoperatively.",
keywords = "Cervical spine, Compound muscle action potential, Dumbbell tumor, Electrical stimulation, Electromyography, Intraoperative monitoring",
author = "LanJun Guo and Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa and Yingling, {Charles D.} and Weinstein, {Philip R.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/01.bsd.0000174566.19640.f1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "37--42",
journal = "Journal of Spinal Disorders",
issn = "1536-0652",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continuous EMG recordings and intraoperative electrical stimulation for identification and protection of cervical nerve roots during foraminal tumor surgery

AU - Guo, LanJun

AU - Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo

AU - Yingling, Charles D.

AU - Weinstein, Philip R.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord function is now routinely monitored with somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during surgery for intraspinal cervical dumbbell and foraminal tumors. However, upper extremity nerve roots are also at risk during these procedures. Anatomic relations are frequently difficult to interpret because the nerve roots may be displaced by the tumor. We used electrical stimulation with compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recordings at multiple sites to identify the location and course of the involved nerve root and to provide real-time information regarding the functional status of the roots to predict postoperative outcome. METHODS: Ten patients were monitored during surgery for cervical dumbbell or foraminal tumors. SEPs and MEPs were monitored as a routine procedure. CMAPs were recorded from needle electrodes placed in the deltoid, biceps, triceps, and flexor carpi ulnaris muscles. Spontaneous electromyography (EMG) muscle activity was also continuously monitored. A handheld monopolar stimulation electrode was used to elicit evoked EMG responses to identify and trace the course of nerves in relation to the tumor. In four patients, the stimulation threshold was tested before and after tumor resection to predict postoperative nerve root function. RESULTS: Electrical stimulation with CMAP recording was successful in localizing nerve roots during tumor resection in all 10 patients. Monitoring predicted postoperative nerve root preservation after tumor removal in each case. It was possible to identify either by using low-level stimulation (<2.0 V) or by observing changes in spontaneous EMG amplitude if activation was present during surgical dissection. The monitoring of spontaneous muscle activity in response to direct or indirect surgical manipulation during tumor resection also provided continuous assessment of nerve root function and identified any physiologic disturbance induced by surgical manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation in the operating field and recording of CMAPs facilitated nerve root identification and predicted postoperative function during dissection and separation from ligamentous or neoplastic tissue in 10 patients. Electrical stimulation might also be useful to predict postoperative preservation of function when nerve root sacrifice is necessary and no motor response is detected intraoperatively.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord function is now routinely monitored with somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during surgery for intraspinal cervical dumbbell and foraminal tumors. However, upper extremity nerve roots are also at risk during these procedures. Anatomic relations are frequently difficult to interpret because the nerve roots may be displaced by the tumor. We used electrical stimulation with compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recordings at multiple sites to identify the location and course of the involved nerve root and to provide real-time information regarding the functional status of the roots to predict postoperative outcome. METHODS: Ten patients were monitored during surgery for cervical dumbbell or foraminal tumors. SEPs and MEPs were monitored as a routine procedure. CMAPs were recorded from needle electrodes placed in the deltoid, biceps, triceps, and flexor carpi ulnaris muscles. Spontaneous electromyography (EMG) muscle activity was also continuously monitored. A handheld monopolar stimulation electrode was used to elicit evoked EMG responses to identify and trace the course of nerves in relation to the tumor. In four patients, the stimulation threshold was tested before and after tumor resection to predict postoperative nerve root function. RESULTS: Electrical stimulation with CMAP recording was successful in localizing nerve roots during tumor resection in all 10 patients. Monitoring predicted postoperative nerve root preservation after tumor removal in each case. It was possible to identify either by using low-level stimulation (<2.0 V) or by observing changes in spontaneous EMG amplitude if activation was present during surgical dissection. The monitoring of spontaneous muscle activity in response to direct or indirect surgical manipulation during tumor resection also provided continuous assessment of nerve root function and identified any physiologic disturbance induced by surgical manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation in the operating field and recording of CMAPs facilitated nerve root identification and predicted postoperative function during dissection and separation from ligamentous or neoplastic tissue in 10 patients. Electrical stimulation might also be useful to predict postoperative preservation of function when nerve root sacrifice is necessary and no motor response is detected intraoperatively.

KW - Cervical spine

KW - Compound muscle action potential

KW - Dumbbell tumor

KW - Electrical stimulation

KW - Electromyography

KW - Intraoperative monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745589259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745589259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.bsd.0000174566.19640.f1

DO - 10.1097/01.bsd.0000174566.19640.f1

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 37

EP - 42

JO - Journal of Spinal Disorders

JF - Journal of Spinal Disorders

SN - 1536-0652

IS - 1

ER -