Context-sensitive decision support (infobuttons) in electronic health records: A systematic review

David Allan Cook, Miguel T. Teixeira, Bret S E Heale, James J. Cimino, Guilherme Del Fiol

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Infobuttons appear as small icons adjacent to electronic health record (EHR) data (e.g., medications, diagnoses, or test results) that, when clicked, access online knowledge resources tailored to the patient, care setting, or task. Infobuttons are required for "Meaningful Use" certification of US EHRs. We sought to evaluate infobuttons' impact on clinical practice and identify features associated with improved outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases from inception to July 6, 2015. We included and cataloged all original research in any language describing implementation of infobuttons or other context-sensitive links. Studies evaluating clinical implementations with outcomes of usage or impact were reviewed in greater detail. Reviewers worked in duplicate to select articles, evaluate quality, and abstract information. Results: Of 599 potential articles, 77 described infobutton implementation. The 17 studies meriting detailed review, including 3 randomized trials, yielded the following findings. Infobutton usage frequency ranged from 0.3 to 7.4 uses per month per potential user. Usage appeared to be influenced by EHR task. Five studies found that infobuttons are used less often than non-context-sensitive links (proportionate usage 0.20-0.34). In 3 studies, users answered their clinical question in > 69% of infobutton sessions. Seven studies evaluated alternative approaches to infobutton design and implementation. No studies isolated the impact of infobuttons on objectively measured patient outcomes. Conclusions: Weak evidence suggests that infobuttons can help providers answer clinical questions. Research on optimal infobutton design and implementation, and on the impact on patient outcomes and provider behaviors, is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberocw104
Pages (from-to)460-468
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Certification
Research
MEDLINE
Patient Care
Language
Databases
cyhalothrin
Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Clinical
  • Decision support systems
  • Hospital information systems
  • Infobutton
  • Medical informatics applications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Context-sensitive decision support (infobuttons) in electronic health records : A systematic review. / Cook, David Allan; Teixeira, Miguel T.; Heale, Bret S E; Cimino, James J.; Del Fiol, Guilherme.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 24, No. 2, ocw104, 01.03.2017, p. 460-468.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Cook, David Allan ; Teixeira, Miguel T. ; Heale, Bret S E ; Cimino, James J. ; Del Fiol, Guilherme. / Context-sensitive decision support (infobuttons) in electronic health records : A systematic review. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 460-468.
@article{85ee74bd677c44d7bf888d5757420316,
title = "Context-sensitive decision support (infobuttons) in electronic health records: A systematic review",
abstract = "Objective: Infobuttons appear as small icons adjacent to electronic health record (EHR) data (e.g., medications, diagnoses, or test results) that, when clicked, access online knowledge resources tailored to the patient, care setting, or task. Infobuttons are required for {"}Meaningful Use{"} certification of US EHRs. We sought to evaluate infobuttons' impact on clinical practice and identify features associated with improved outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases from inception to July 6, 2015. We included and cataloged all original research in any language describing implementation of infobuttons or other context-sensitive links. Studies evaluating clinical implementations with outcomes of usage or impact were reviewed in greater detail. Reviewers worked in duplicate to select articles, evaluate quality, and abstract information. Results: Of 599 potential articles, 77 described infobutton implementation. The 17 studies meriting detailed review, including 3 randomized trials, yielded the following findings. Infobutton usage frequency ranged from 0.3 to 7.4 uses per month per potential user. Usage appeared to be influenced by EHR task. Five studies found that infobuttons are used less often than non-context-sensitive links (proportionate usage 0.20-0.34). In 3 studies, users answered their clinical question in > 69{\%} of infobutton sessions. Seven studies evaluated alternative approaches to infobutton design and implementation. No studies isolated the impact of infobuttons on objectively measured patient outcomes. Conclusions: Weak evidence suggests that infobuttons can help providers answer clinical questions. Research on optimal infobutton design and implementation, and on the impact on patient outcomes and provider behaviors, is needed.",
keywords = "Clinical, Decision support systems, Hospital information systems, Infobutton, Medical informatics applications",
author = "Cook, {David Allan} and Teixeira, {Miguel T.} and Heale, {Bret S E} and Cimino, {James J.} and {Del Fiol}, Guilherme",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jamia/ocw104",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "460--468",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Context-sensitive decision support (infobuttons) in electronic health records

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Cook, David Allan

AU - Teixeira, Miguel T.

AU - Heale, Bret S E

AU - Cimino, James J.

AU - Del Fiol, Guilherme

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objective: Infobuttons appear as small icons adjacent to electronic health record (EHR) data (e.g., medications, diagnoses, or test results) that, when clicked, access online knowledge resources tailored to the patient, care setting, or task. Infobuttons are required for "Meaningful Use" certification of US EHRs. We sought to evaluate infobuttons' impact on clinical practice and identify features associated with improved outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases from inception to July 6, 2015. We included and cataloged all original research in any language describing implementation of infobuttons or other context-sensitive links. Studies evaluating clinical implementations with outcomes of usage or impact were reviewed in greater detail. Reviewers worked in duplicate to select articles, evaluate quality, and abstract information. Results: Of 599 potential articles, 77 described infobutton implementation. The 17 studies meriting detailed review, including 3 randomized trials, yielded the following findings. Infobutton usage frequency ranged from 0.3 to 7.4 uses per month per potential user. Usage appeared to be influenced by EHR task. Five studies found that infobuttons are used less often than non-context-sensitive links (proportionate usage 0.20-0.34). In 3 studies, users answered their clinical question in > 69% of infobutton sessions. Seven studies evaluated alternative approaches to infobutton design and implementation. No studies isolated the impact of infobuttons on objectively measured patient outcomes. Conclusions: Weak evidence suggests that infobuttons can help providers answer clinical questions. Research on optimal infobutton design and implementation, and on the impact on patient outcomes and provider behaviors, is needed.

AB - Objective: Infobuttons appear as small icons adjacent to electronic health record (EHR) data (e.g., medications, diagnoses, or test results) that, when clicked, access online knowledge resources tailored to the patient, care setting, or task. Infobuttons are required for "Meaningful Use" certification of US EHRs. We sought to evaluate infobuttons' impact on clinical practice and identify features associated with improved outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases from inception to July 6, 2015. We included and cataloged all original research in any language describing implementation of infobuttons or other context-sensitive links. Studies evaluating clinical implementations with outcomes of usage or impact were reviewed in greater detail. Reviewers worked in duplicate to select articles, evaluate quality, and abstract information. Results: Of 599 potential articles, 77 described infobutton implementation. The 17 studies meriting detailed review, including 3 randomized trials, yielded the following findings. Infobutton usage frequency ranged from 0.3 to 7.4 uses per month per potential user. Usage appeared to be influenced by EHR task. Five studies found that infobuttons are used less often than non-context-sensitive links (proportionate usage 0.20-0.34). In 3 studies, users answered their clinical question in > 69% of infobutton sessions. Seven studies evaluated alternative approaches to infobutton design and implementation. No studies isolated the impact of infobuttons on objectively measured patient outcomes. Conclusions: Weak evidence suggests that infobuttons can help providers answer clinical questions. Research on optimal infobutton design and implementation, and on the impact on patient outcomes and provider behaviors, is needed.

KW - Clinical

KW - Decision support systems

KW - Hospital information systems

KW - Infobutton

KW - Medical informatics applications

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016290274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016290274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocw104

DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocw104

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27497794

AN - SCOPUS:85016290274

VL - 24

SP - 460

EP - 468

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 2

M1 - ocw104

ER -