Content and timing of feedback and reflection: A multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers

Jed D. Gonzalo, Brian S. Heist, Briar L. Duffy, Liselotte (Lotte) Dyrbye, Mark J. Fagan, Gary Ferenchick, Heather Harrell, Paul A. Hemmer, Walter N. Kernan, Jennifer R. Kogan, Colleen Rafferty, Raymond Wong, Michael D. Elnicki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Competency-based medical education increasingly recognizes the importance of observation, feedback, and reflection for trainee development. Although bedside rounds provide opportunities for authentic workplace-based implementation of feedback and team-based reflection strategies, this relationship has not been well described. The authors sought to understand the content and timing of feedback and team-based reflection provided by bedside teachers in the context of patient-centered bedside rounds.

Methods. The authors conducted a thematic analysis qualitative study using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews with internal medicine attending physicians (n= 34) identified as respected bedside teachers from 10 academic US institutions (2010-2011).

Results: Half of the respondents (50%) were associate/full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. In the context of bedside encounters, bedside teachers reported providing feedback on history-taking, physical-examination, and case-presentation skills, patient-centered communication, clinical decision-making, leadership, teaching skills, and professionalism. Positive feedback about physical-exam skills or clinical decision-making occurred during encounters, positive or constructive team-based feedback occurred immediately following encounters, and individualized constructive feedback occurred in one-on-one settings following rounding sessions. Compared to less frequent, emotionally-charged events, bedside teachers initiated team-based reflection on commonplace "teachable moments" related to patient characteristics or emotions, trainee actions and emotions, and attending physician role modeling.

Conclusions: Bedside teachers use bedside rounds as a workplace-based method to provide assessment, feedback, and reflection, which are aligned with the goals of competency-based medical education. Embedded in patient-centered activities, clinical teachers should be encouraged to incorporate these content- and timing-related feedback and reflection strategies into their bedside teaching.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number212
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 10 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

teacher
Competency-Based Education
Medical Education
Workplace
trainee
Teaching
Emotions
emotion
workplace
physician
Physician's Role
decision making
Internal Medicine
telephone interview
Physical Examination
History
Communication
education
Observation
Interviews

Keywords

  • Medical education
  • Medical education-faculty development
  • Medical education-qualitative methods
  • Patient centered care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Content and timing of feedback and reflection : A multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers. / Gonzalo, Jed D.; Heist, Brian S.; Duffy, Briar L.; Dyrbye, Liselotte (Lotte); Fagan, Mark J.; Ferenchick, Gary; Harrell, Heather; Hemmer, Paul A.; Kernan, Walter N.; Kogan, Jennifer R.; Rafferty, Colleen; Wong, Raymond; Elnicki, Michael D.

In: BMC Medical Education, Vol. 14, No. 1, 212, 10.10.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gonzalo, JD, Heist, BS, Duffy, BL, Dyrbye, LL, Fagan, MJ, Ferenchick, G, Harrell, H, Hemmer, PA, Kernan, WN, Kogan, JR, Rafferty, C, Wong, R & Elnicki, MD 2014, 'Content and timing of feedback and reflection: A multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers', BMC Medical Education, vol. 14, no. 1, 212. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-212
Gonzalo, Jed D. ; Heist, Brian S. ; Duffy, Briar L. ; Dyrbye, Liselotte (Lotte) ; Fagan, Mark J. ; Ferenchick, Gary ; Harrell, Heather ; Hemmer, Paul A. ; Kernan, Walter N. ; Kogan, Jennifer R. ; Rafferty, Colleen ; Wong, Raymond ; Elnicki, Michael D. / Content and timing of feedback and reflection : A multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers. In: BMC Medical Education. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 1.
@article{6d7f72bc2ca342da812693d36f17815c,
title = "Content and timing of feedback and reflection: A multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers",
abstract = "Background: Competency-based medical education increasingly recognizes the importance of observation, feedback, and reflection for trainee development. Although bedside rounds provide opportunities for authentic workplace-based implementation of feedback and team-based reflection strategies, this relationship has not been well described. The authors sought to understand the content and timing of feedback and team-based reflection provided by bedside teachers in the context of patient-centered bedside rounds.Methods. The authors conducted a thematic analysis qualitative study using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews with internal medicine attending physicians (n= 34) identified as respected bedside teachers from 10 academic US institutions (2010-2011).Results: Half of the respondents (50{\%}) were associate/full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. In the context of bedside encounters, bedside teachers reported providing feedback on history-taking, physical-examination, and case-presentation skills, patient-centered communication, clinical decision-making, leadership, teaching skills, and professionalism. Positive feedback about physical-exam skills or clinical decision-making occurred during encounters, positive or constructive team-based feedback occurred immediately following encounters, and individualized constructive feedback occurred in one-on-one settings following rounding sessions. Compared to less frequent, emotionally-charged events, bedside teachers initiated team-based reflection on commonplace {"}teachable moments{"} related to patient characteristics or emotions, trainee actions and emotions, and attending physician role modeling.Conclusions: Bedside teachers use bedside rounds as a workplace-based method to provide assessment, feedback, and reflection, which are aligned with the goals of competency-based medical education. Embedded in patient-centered activities, clinical teachers should be encouraged to incorporate these content- and timing-related feedback and reflection strategies into their bedside teaching.",
keywords = "Medical education, Medical education-faculty development, Medical education-qualitative methods, Patient centered care",
author = "Gonzalo, {Jed D.} and Heist, {Brian S.} and Duffy, {Briar L.} and Dyrbye, {Liselotte (Lotte)} and Fagan, {Mark J.} and Gary Ferenchick and Heather Harrell and Hemmer, {Paul A.} and Kernan, {Walter N.} and Kogan, {Jennifer R.} and Colleen Rafferty and Raymond Wong and Elnicki, {Michael D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6920-14-212",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "BMC Medical Education",
issn = "1472-6920",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Content and timing of feedback and reflection

T2 - A multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers

AU - Gonzalo, Jed D.

AU - Heist, Brian S.

AU - Duffy, Briar L.

AU - Dyrbye, Liselotte (Lotte)

AU - Fagan, Mark J.

AU - Ferenchick, Gary

AU - Harrell, Heather

AU - Hemmer, Paul A.

AU - Kernan, Walter N.

AU - Kogan, Jennifer R.

AU - Rafferty, Colleen

AU - Wong, Raymond

AU - Elnicki, Michael D.

PY - 2014/10/10

Y1 - 2014/10/10

N2 - Background: Competency-based medical education increasingly recognizes the importance of observation, feedback, and reflection for trainee development. Although bedside rounds provide opportunities for authentic workplace-based implementation of feedback and team-based reflection strategies, this relationship has not been well described. The authors sought to understand the content and timing of feedback and team-based reflection provided by bedside teachers in the context of patient-centered bedside rounds.Methods. The authors conducted a thematic analysis qualitative study using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews with internal medicine attending physicians (n= 34) identified as respected bedside teachers from 10 academic US institutions (2010-2011).Results: Half of the respondents (50%) were associate/full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. In the context of bedside encounters, bedside teachers reported providing feedback on history-taking, physical-examination, and case-presentation skills, patient-centered communication, clinical decision-making, leadership, teaching skills, and professionalism. Positive feedback about physical-exam skills or clinical decision-making occurred during encounters, positive or constructive team-based feedback occurred immediately following encounters, and individualized constructive feedback occurred in one-on-one settings following rounding sessions. Compared to less frequent, emotionally-charged events, bedside teachers initiated team-based reflection on commonplace "teachable moments" related to patient characteristics or emotions, trainee actions and emotions, and attending physician role modeling.Conclusions: Bedside teachers use bedside rounds as a workplace-based method to provide assessment, feedback, and reflection, which are aligned with the goals of competency-based medical education. Embedded in patient-centered activities, clinical teachers should be encouraged to incorporate these content- and timing-related feedback and reflection strategies into their bedside teaching.

AB - Background: Competency-based medical education increasingly recognizes the importance of observation, feedback, and reflection for trainee development. Although bedside rounds provide opportunities for authentic workplace-based implementation of feedback and team-based reflection strategies, this relationship has not been well described. The authors sought to understand the content and timing of feedback and team-based reflection provided by bedside teachers in the context of patient-centered bedside rounds.Methods. The authors conducted a thematic analysis qualitative study using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews with internal medicine attending physicians (n= 34) identified as respected bedside teachers from 10 academic US institutions (2010-2011).Results: Half of the respondents (50%) were associate/full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. In the context of bedside encounters, bedside teachers reported providing feedback on history-taking, physical-examination, and case-presentation skills, patient-centered communication, clinical decision-making, leadership, teaching skills, and professionalism. Positive feedback about physical-exam skills or clinical decision-making occurred during encounters, positive or constructive team-based feedback occurred immediately following encounters, and individualized constructive feedback occurred in one-on-one settings following rounding sessions. Compared to less frequent, emotionally-charged events, bedside teachers initiated team-based reflection on commonplace "teachable moments" related to patient characteristics or emotions, trainee actions and emotions, and attending physician role modeling.Conclusions: Bedside teachers use bedside rounds as a workplace-based method to provide assessment, feedback, and reflection, which are aligned with the goals of competency-based medical education. Embedded in patient-centered activities, clinical teachers should be encouraged to incorporate these content- and timing-related feedback and reflection strategies into their bedside teaching.

KW - Medical education

KW - Medical education-faculty development

KW - Medical education-qualitative methods

KW - Patient centered care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907932170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907932170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6920-14-212

DO - 10.1186/1472-6920-14-212

M3 - Article

C2 - 25304386

AN - SCOPUS:84907932170

VL - 14

JO - BMC Medical Education

JF - BMC Medical Education

SN - 1472-6920

IS - 1

M1 - 212

ER -