Contending Worldviews in the Clinical Encounter

Ashok Kumbamu, Gail Geller, Aaron Leppin, Cara Fernandez, Jon C Tilburt, Barbara Koenig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: In this article, the authors characterize the different ways patients and clinicians discuss complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) during routine cancer care. Methods: Over a period of two years, the authors audio-recorded clinical interactions between 37 medical oncology clinicians and a sample of 327 oncology patients at an academic cancer center in the Midwest United States. Recordings of conversations that included any discussion of CAM were transcribed and analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach. Results: Out of 327 conversations, CAM was mentioned and/or discussed in only 31 encounters. Communication dynamics between clinician and patient involve several factors: the condition of the patient and his or her knowledge about and experience with CAM, the clinician's knowledge and values about CAM, perceived assumptions and stereotypes about CAM, and institutional response to the integration of CAM in cancer care. Conclusion: Addressing the difficult and sensitive topic of CAM in cancer care requires hearing patients in a manner meaningful to them. In that sense, CAM can serve as an important marker and test case in the march toward shared decision-making and patient-centered communication generally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)996-1002
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Volume24
Issue number9-10
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Neoplasms
Communication
Medical Oncology

Keywords

  • clinical deliberations
  • complementary and alternative medicine
  • oncology
  • patient-physician communication
  • qualitative content analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Contending Worldviews in the Clinical Encounter. / Kumbamu, Ashok; Geller, Gail; Leppin, Aaron; Fernandez, Cara; Tilburt, Jon C; Koenig, Barbara.

In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 9-10, 01.09.2018, p. 996-1002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kumbamu, A, Geller, G, Leppin, A, Fernandez, C, Tilburt, JC & Koenig, B 2018, 'Contending Worldviews in the Clinical Encounter', Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 24, no. 9-10, pp. 996-1002. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2018.0200
Kumbamu, Ashok ; Geller, Gail ; Leppin, Aaron ; Fernandez, Cara ; Tilburt, Jon C ; Koenig, Barbara. / Contending Worldviews in the Clinical Encounter. In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 9-10. pp. 996-1002.
@article{e9e107fac37d471badcaf6d08c094ebf,
title = "Contending Worldviews in the Clinical Encounter",
abstract = "Objective: In this article, the authors characterize the different ways patients and clinicians discuss complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) during routine cancer care. Methods: Over a period of two years, the authors audio-recorded clinical interactions between 37 medical oncology clinicians and a sample of 327 oncology patients at an academic cancer center in the Midwest United States. Recordings of conversations that included any discussion of CAM were transcribed and analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach. Results: Out of 327 conversations, CAM was mentioned and/or discussed in only 31 encounters. Communication dynamics between clinician and patient involve several factors: the condition of the patient and his or her knowledge about and experience with CAM, the clinician's knowledge and values about CAM, perceived assumptions and stereotypes about CAM, and institutional response to the integration of CAM in cancer care. Conclusion: Addressing the difficult and sensitive topic of CAM in cancer care requires hearing patients in a manner meaningful to them. In that sense, CAM can serve as an important marker and test case in the march toward shared decision-making and patient-centered communication generally.",
keywords = "clinical deliberations, complementary and alternative medicine, oncology, patient-physician communication, qualitative content analysis",
author = "Ashok Kumbamu and Gail Geller and Aaron Leppin and Cara Fernandez and Tilburt, {Jon C} and Barbara Koenig",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/acm.2018.0200",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "996--1002",
journal = "Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine",
issn = "1075-5535",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "9-10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contending Worldviews in the Clinical Encounter

AU - Kumbamu, Ashok

AU - Geller, Gail

AU - Leppin, Aaron

AU - Fernandez, Cara

AU - Tilburt, Jon C

AU - Koenig, Barbara

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Objective: In this article, the authors characterize the different ways patients and clinicians discuss complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) during routine cancer care. Methods: Over a period of two years, the authors audio-recorded clinical interactions between 37 medical oncology clinicians and a sample of 327 oncology patients at an academic cancer center in the Midwest United States. Recordings of conversations that included any discussion of CAM were transcribed and analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach. Results: Out of 327 conversations, CAM was mentioned and/or discussed in only 31 encounters. Communication dynamics between clinician and patient involve several factors: the condition of the patient and his or her knowledge about and experience with CAM, the clinician's knowledge and values about CAM, perceived assumptions and stereotypes about CAM, and institutional response to the integration of CAM in cancer care. Conclusion: Addressing the difficult and sensitive topic of CAM in cancer care requires hearing patients in a manner meaningful to them. In that sense, CAM can serve as an important marker and test case in the march toward shared decision-making and patient-centered communication generally.

AB - Objective: In this article, the authors characterize the different ways patients and clinicians discuss complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) during routine cancer care. Methods: Over a period of two years, the authors audio-recorded clinical interactions between 37 medical oncology clinicians and a sample of 327 oncology patients at an academic cancer center in the Midwest United States. Recordings of conversations that included any discussion of CAM were transcribed and analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach. Results: Out of 327 conversations, CAM was mentioned and/or discussed in only 31 encounters. Communication dynamics between clinician and patient involve several factors: the condition of the patient and his or her knowledge about and experience with CAM, the clinician's knowledge and values about CAM, perceived assumptions and stereotypes about CAM, and institutional response to the integration of CAM in cancer care. Conclusion: Addressing the difficult and sensitive topic of CAM in cancer care requires hearing patients in a manner meaningful to them. In that sense, CAM can serve as an important marker and test case in the march toward shared decision-making and patient-centered communication generally.

KW - clinical deliberations

KW - complementary and alternative medicine

KW - oncology

KW - patient-physician communication

KW - qualitative content analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054008293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054008293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/acm.2018.0200

DO - 10.1089/acm.2018.0200

M3 - Article

C2 - 30156425

AN - SCOPUS:85054008293

VL - 24

SP - 996

EP - 1002

JO - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

JF - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

SN - 1075-5535

IS - 9-10

ER -