Considering virtue: Public health and clinical ethics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As bioethicists increasingly turn their attention to the profession of public health, many candidate frameworks have been proposed, often with an eye toward articulating the values and foundational concepts that distinguish this practice from curative clinical medicine. First, I will argue that while these suggestions for a distinct ethics of public health are promising, they arise from problems within contemporary bioethics that must be taken into account. Without such cognizance of the impetus for public health ethics, we risk developing a set of ethical resources meant exclusively for public health professionals, thereby neglecting implications for curative medical ethics and the practice of bioethics more broadly. Second, I will present reasons for thinking some of the critiques of dominant contemporary bioethics can be met by a virtue ethics approach. I present a virtue ethics response to criticisms that concern (1) increased rigor in bioethics discourse; (2) the ability of normative theory to accommodate context; and (3) explicit attention to the nature of ethical conflict. I conclude that a virtue ethics approach is a viable avenue for further inquiry, one that leads us away from developing ethics of public health in a vacuum and has the potential for overcoming certain pitfalls of contemporary bioethics discourse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)888-893
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Clinical Ethics
Bioethics
Ethics
Public Health
Ethicists
Medical Ethics
Aptitude
Clinical Medicine
Vacuum

Keywords

  • clinical ethics
  • conflict
  • context
  • public health
  • rigor
  • virtue ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Considering virtue : Public health and clinical ethics. / Meagher, Karen.

In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 17, No. 5, 01.10.2011, p. 888-893.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee82f5cb724c403c9bff24d1e0eff86c,
title = "Considering virtue: Public health and clinical ethics",
abstract = "As bioethicists increasingly turn their attention to the profession of public health, many candidate frameworks have been proposed, often with an eye toward articulating the values and foundational concepts that distinguish this practice from curative clinical medicine. First, I will argue that while these suggestions for a distinct ethics of public health are promising, they arise from problems within contemporary bioethics that must be taken into account. Without such cognizance of the impetus for public health ethics, we risk developing a set of ethical resources meant exclusively for public health professionals, thereby neglecting implications for curative medical ethics and the practice of bioethics more broadly. Second, I will present reasons for thinking some of the critiques of dominant contemporary bioethics can be met by a virtue ethics approach. I present a virtue ethics response to criticisms that concern (1) increased rigor in bioethics discourse; (2) the ability of normative theory to accommodate context; and (3) explicit attention to the nature of ethical conflict. I conclude that a virtue ethics approach is a viable avenue for further inquiry, one that leads us away from developing ethics of public health in a vacuum and has the potential for overcoming certain pitfalls of contemporary bioethics discourse.",
keywords = "clinical ethics, conflict, context, public health, rigor, virtue ethics",
author = "Karen Meagher",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01721.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "888--893",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considering virtue

T2 - Public health and clinical ethics

AU - Meagher, Karen

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - As bioethicists increasingly turn their attention to the profession of public health, many candidate frameworks have been proposed, often with an eye toward articulating the values and foundational concepts that distinguish this practice from curative clinical medicine. First, I will argue that while these suggestions for a distinct ethics of public health are promising, they arise from problems within contemporary bioethics that must be taken into account. Without such cognizance of the impetus for public health ethics, we risk developing a set of ethical resources meant exclusively for public health professionals, thereby neglecting implications for curative medical ethics and the practice of bioethics more broadly. Second, I will present reasons for thinking some of the critiques of dominant contemporary bioethics can be met by a virtue ethics approach. I present a virtue ethics response to criticisms that concern (1) increased rigor in bioethics discourse; (2) the ability of normative theory to accommodate context; and (3) explicit attention to the nature of ethical conflict. I conclude that a virtue ethics approach is a viable avenue for further inquiry, one that leads us away from developing ethics of public health in a vacuum and has the potential for overcoming certain pitfalls of contemporary bioethics discourse.

AB - As bioethicists increasingly turn their attention to the profession of public health, many candidate frameworks have been proposed, often with an eye toward articulating the values and foundational concepts that distinguish this practice from curative clinical medicine. First, I will argue that while these suggestions for a distinct ethics of public health are promising, they arise from problems within contemporary bioethics that must be taken into account. Without such cognizance of the impetus for public health ethics, we risk developing a set of ethical resources meant exclusively for public health professionals, thereby neglecting implications for curative medical ethics and the practice of bioethics more broadly. Second, I will present reasons for thinking some of the critiques of dominant contemporary bioethics can be met by a virtue ethics approach. I present a virtue ethics response to criticisms that concern (1) increased rigor in bioethics discourse; (2) the ability of normative theory to accommodate context; and (3) explicit attention to the nature of ethical conflict. I conclude that a virtue ethics approach is a viable avenue for further inquiry, one that leads us away from developing ethics of public health in a vacuum and has the potential for overcoming certain pitfalls of contemporary bioethics discourse.

KW - clinical ethics

KW - conflict

KW - context

KW - public health

KW - rigor

KW - virtue ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053196821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053196821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01721.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01721.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21834841

AN - SCOPUS:80053196821

VL - 17

SP - 888

EP - 893

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

SN - 1356-1294

IS - 5

ER -