TY - JOUR
T1 - Computer-aided detection of polyps in a colon phantom
T2 - Effect of scan orientation, polyp size, collimation, and dose
AU - Ling, Shuo Hung
AU - Summers, Ronald M.
AU - Loew, Murray H.
AU - McCollough, Cynthia H.
AU - Johnson, C. Daniel
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Purpose: To determine the importance of polyp size, orientation to the scan plane, collimation, scanner type (single or multislice helical), and radiation dose on computed tomography (CT) colonography computer-aided detection. Materials and Methods: Eight tissue-equivalent simulated polyps were placed into the interior of an air-filled acrylic tube placed within a water-filled box. Their sizes, expressed by diameter and height in millimeters, were 10 × 10, 10 × 7, 10 × 5, 10 × 3, 7 × 7, 7 × 5, 7 × 3, and 5 × 5. Detection of the polyps was performed by applying our prototype automated polyp detector software to 48 CT colonography data sets of the phantom acquired with different CT scanner settings. Results: We detected at least six of the eight polyps in 47 of 48 experiments. The two most frequently undetected polyps (7 × 7 and 5 × 5) had extreme eccentricity (their height was twice the radius of the base) and were most commonly missed for 90° tube orientation, 5-mm collimation, and high table speed. False-positive detections occurred in only 5 of 48 experiments. Conclusion: Clinically significant 10-mm polyps can be detected with 100% sensitivity in all orientations, doses, collimations, and modes that we examined.
AB - Purpose: To determine the importance of polyp size, orientation to the scan plane, collimation, scanner type (single or multislice helical), and radiation dose on computed tomography (CT) colonography computer-aided detection. Materials and Methods: Eight tissue-equivalent simulated polyps were placed into the interior of an air-filled acrylic tube placed within a water-filled box. Their sizes, expressed by diameter and height in millimeters, were 10 × 10, 10 × 7, 10 × 5, 10 × 3, 7 × 7, 7 × 5, 7 × 3, and 5 × 5. Detection of the polyps was performed by applying our prototype automated polyp detector software to 48 CT colonography data sets of the phantom acquired with different CT scanner settings. Results: We detected at least six of the eight polyps in 47 of 48 experiments. The two most frequently undetected polyps (7 × 7 and 5 × 5) had extreme eccentricity (their height was twice the radius of the base) and were most commonly missed for 90° tube orientation, 5-mm collimation, and high table speed. False-positive detections occurred in only 5 of 48 experiments. Conclusion: Clinically significant 10-mm polyps can be detected with 100% sensitivity in all orientations, doses, collimations, and modes that we examined.
KW - CT colonography
KW - Colon cancer
KW - Computer-assisted diagnosis
KW - Phantom
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036871378&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036871378&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00004728-200211000-00027
DO - 10.1097/00004728-200211000-00027
M3 - Article
C2 - 12488752
AN - SCOPUS:0036871378
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 26
SP - 1013
EP - 1018
JO - Journal of computer assisted tomography
JF - Journal of computer assisted tomography
IS - 6
ER -