Computer-administered rating scales for social anxiety in a clinical drug trial

Kenneth A. Kobak, Sarah C. Schaettle, John H. Greist, James W. Jefferson, David J Katzelnick, Susan L. Dottl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Computer-administered versions of two clinician-administered symptom rating scales for social anxiety (the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale [LSAS] and the Brief Social Phobia Scale [BSPS]) and one paper-and-pencil scale (the Fear Questionnaire) were developed and utilized in a clinical trial for social phobia. The reliability and validity of the computer versions were examined, as were their equivalence to the traditional versions. Correlations between the computer and original versions were high at baseline, and remained high throughout the study. The internal consistency reliability of the computer scales was also high, and almost identical to the original versions. Mean score differences between computer and original versions were not significant at baseline, and no significant differences were found between computer and traditional versions on the amount of change detected from baseline to endpoint. Seventy-seven percent of subjects felt that the computer did not interfere with their visit at baseline and a plurality (36%) preferred the computer, with 30% preferring the clinician and 34% having no preference. By the end of the study, the plurality (41%) had no preference, with 27% preferring the computer and 32% preferring the clinician. Results support the use of these computer-administered symptom rating scales of social anxiety as a viable alternative to the clinician-administered versions with this subset of patients, which should offer researchers and clinicians a reliable and cost-effective method for evaluating social phobia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-104
Number of pages8
JournalDepression and Anxiety
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anxiety
Clinical Trials
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Reproducibility of Results
Fear
Research Personnel
Costs and Cost Analysis
Social Phobia

Keywords

  • Computer- assisted diagnosis
  • Computers
  • Psychological tests
  • Psychometrics
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Social phobia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Computer-administered rating scales for social anxiety in a clinical drug trial. / Kobak, Kenneth A.; Schaettle, Sarah C.; Greist, John H.; Jefferson, James W.; Katzelnick, David J; Dottl, Susan L.

In: Depression and Anxiety, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1998, p. 97-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kobak, Kenneth A. ; Schaettle, Sarah C. ; Greist, John H. ; Jefferson, James W. ; Katzelnick, David J ; Dottl, Susan L. / Computer-administered rating scales for social anxiety in a clinical drug trial. In: Depression and Anxiety. 1998 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 97-104.
@article{a63abcb6de0849d5bed1e3d6aa0e926a,
title = "Computer-administered rating scales for social anxiety in a clinical drug trial",
abstract = "Computer-administered versions of two clinician-administered symptom rating scales for social anxiety (the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale [LSAS] and the Brief Social Phobia Scale [BSPS]) and one paper-and-pencil scale (the Fear Questionnaire) were developed and utilized in a clinical trial for social phobia. The reliability and validity of the computer versions were examined, as were their equivalence to the traditional versions. Correlations between the computer and original versions were high at baseline, and remained high throughout the study. The internal consistency reliability of the computer scales was also high, and almost identical to the original versions. Mean score differences between computer and original versions were not significant at baseline, and no significant differences were found between computer and traditional versions on the amount of change detected from baseline to endpoint. Seventy-seven percent of subjects felt that the computer did not interfere with their visit at baseline and a plurality (36{\%}) preferred the computer, with 30{\%} preferring the clinician and 34{\%} having no preference. By the end of the study, the plurality (41{\%}) had no preference, with 27{\%} preferring the computer and 32{\%} preferring the clinician. Results support the use of these computer-administered symptom rating scales of social anxiety as a viable alternative to the clinician-administered versions with this subset of patients, which should offer researchers and clinicians a reliable and cost-effective method for evaluating social phobia.",
keywords = "Computer- assisted diagnosis, Computers, Psychological tests, Psychometrics, Randomized controlled trials, Social phobia",
author = "Kobak, {Kenneth A.} and Schaettle, {Sarah C.} and Greist, {John H.} and Jefferson, {James W.} and Katzelnick, {David J} and Dottl, {Susan L.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1998)7:3<97::AID-DA1>3.0.CO;2-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "97--104",
journal = "Depression and Anxiety",
issn = "1091-4269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer-administered rating scales for social anxiety in a clinical drug trial

AU - Kobak, Kenneth A.

AU - Schaettle, Sarah C.

AU - Greist, John H.

AU - Jefferson, James W.

AU - Katzelnick, David J

AU - Dottl, Susan L.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Computer-administered versions of two clinician-administered symptom rating scales for social anxiety (the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale [LSAS] and the Brief Social Phobia Scale [BSPS]) and one paper-and-pencil scale (the Fear Questionnaire) were developed and utilized in a clinical trial for social phobia. The reliability and validity of the computer versions were examined, as were their equivalence to the traditional versions. Correlations between the computer and original versions were high at baseline, and remained high throughout the study. The internal consistency reliability of the computer scales was also high, and almost identical to the original versions. Mean score differences between computer and original versions were not significant at baseline, and no significant differences were found between computer and traditional versions on the amount of change detected from baseline to endpoint. Seventy-seven percent of subjects felt that the computer did not interfere with their visit at baseline and a plurality (36%) preferred the computer, with 30% preferring the clinician and 34% having no preference. By the end of the study, the plurality (41%) had no preference, with 27% preferring the computer and 32% preferring the clinician. Results support the use of these computer-administered symptom rating scales of social anxiety as a viable alternative to the clinician-administered versions with this subset of patients, which should offer researchers and clinicians a reliable and cost-effective method for evaluating social phobia.

AB - Computer-administered versions of two clinician-administered symptom rating scales for social anxiety (the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale [LSAS] and the Brief Social Phobia Scale [BSPS]) and one paper-and-pencil scale (the Fear Questionnaire) were developed and utilized in a clinical trial for social phobia. The reliability and validity of the computer versions were examined, as were their equivalence to the traditional versions. Correlations between the computer and original versions were high at baseline, and remained high throughout the study. The internal consistency reliability of the computer scales was also high, and almost identical to the original versions. Mean score differences between computer and original versions were not significant at baseline, and no significant differences were found between computer and traditional versions on the amount of change detected from baseline to endpoint. Seventy-seven percent of subjects felt that the computer did not interfere with their visit at baseline and a plurality (36%) preferred the computer, with 30% preferring the clinician and 34% having no preference. By the end of the study, the plurality (41%) had no preference, with 27% preferring the computer and 32% preferring the clinician. Results support the use of these computer-administered symptom rating scales of social anxiety as a viable alternative to the clinician-administered versions with this subset of patients, which should offer researchers and clinicians a reliable and cost-effective method for evaluating social phobia.

KW - Computer- assisted diagnosis

KW - Computers

KW - Psychological tests

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Randomized controlled trials

KW - Social phobia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031860933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031860933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1998)7:3<97::AID-DA1>3.0.CO;2-2

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1998)7:3<97::AID-DA1>3.0.CO;2-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 9656089

AN - SCOPUS:0031860933

VL - 7

SP - 97

EP - 104

JO - Depression and Anxiety

JF - Depression and Anxiety

SN - 1091-4269

IS - 3

ER -