Competing Risk Analysis: What Does It Mean and When Do We Need It in Orthopedics Research?

Hilal Maradit Kremers, Katrina L. Devick, Dirk R. Larson, David G. Lewallen, Daniel J. Berry, Cynthia S. Crowson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Most orthopedic studies involve survival analysis examining the time to an event of interest, such as a specific complication or revision surgery. Competing risks commonly arise in such studies when patients are at risk of more than one mutually exclusive event, such as death, or when the rate of an event depends on the rates of other competing events. In this article, we briefly describe the survival analysis censoring methodology, common fatal and nonfatal competing events, and define circumstances where standard survival analysis can fail in the setting of competing risks with real-world examples from orthopedics. Please visit the following https://youtu.be/ifj_Mm3eGu8 for a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3362-3366
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume36
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2021

Keywords

  • bias
  • censoring
  • competing risk
  • survival analysis
  • total joint arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Competing Risk Analysis: What Does It Mean and When Do We Need It in Orthopedics Research?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this