Comparisons of Noninvasive Methods Used to Assess Exercise Stroke Volume in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Erik H. Van Iterson, Thomas P. Olson, Barry A. Borlaug, Bruce D. Johnson, Eric M. Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) plays an important role in properly phenotyping signs and symptoms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The prognostic value of CPET is strengthened when accompanied by cardiac hemodynamic measurements. Although recognized as the "gold" standard, cardiac catheterization is impractical for routine CPET. Thus, advancing the scientific/methodologic understanding of noninvasive techniques for exercise cardiac hemodynamic assessment is clinically impactful in HFpEF. This study tested the concurrent validity of noninvasive acetylene gas (C2H2) uptake, echocardiography (ECHO), and oxygen pulse (O2pulse) for measuring/predicting exercise stroke volume (SV) in HFpEF. Methods Eighteen white HFpEF and 18 age-/sex-matched healthy controls participated in upright CPET (ages, 69 ± 9 yr vs 63 ± 9 yr). At rest, 20 W, and peak exercise, SV was measured at steady-state via C2H2 rebreathe (SVACET) and ECHO (SVECHO), whereas O2pulse was derived (=VO2/HR). Results Resting relationships between SVACET and SVECHO, SVECHO and O2pulse, or SVACET and O2pulse were significant in HFpEF (R2 = 0.30, 0.36, 0.67), but not controls (R2 = 0.07, 0.01, 0.09), respectively. Resting relationships persisted to 20 W in HFpEF (R2 = 0.70, 0.53, 0.70) and controls (R2 = 0.05, 0.07, 0.21), respectively. Peak exercise relationships were significant in HFpEF (R2 = 0.62, 0.24, 0.64), but only for SVACET versus O2pulse in controls (R2 = 0.07, 0.04, 0.33), respectively. Standardized standard error of estimate between techniques was strongest in HFpEF at 20 W: SVACET versus SVECHO = 0.57 ± 0.22; SVECHO versus O2pulse = 0.71 ± 0.28; SVACET versus O2pulse = 0.56 ± 0.22. Conclusions Constituting a clinically impactful step towards construct validation testing, these data suggest SVACET, SVECHO, and O2pulse demonstrate moderate-to-strong concurrent validity for measuring/predicting exercise SV in HFpEF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1758-1768
Number of pages11
JournalMedicine and science in sports and exercise
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017


  • CPET

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparisons of Noninvasive Methods Used to Assess Exercise Stroke Volume in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this