Comparison of Two Within-Household Selection Methods in a Telephone Survey of Substance Abuse and Dependence

Timothy J. Beebe, Michael E. Davern, Donna D. McAlpine, Jeanette K. Ziegenfuss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Random-digit dial telephone surveys often rely on the random selection of one respondent within the household. We compared a new method of within-household selection to a standard "next birthday" approach on selected survey process measures, respondent characteristics, and substantive results. Methods: From October 2004 through June 2005, we conducted a survey of adults in Minnesota to obtain information about substance use and need for treatment. Control group respondents (n = 1944) were selected using the "next birthday" method, and experimental group respondents (n = 1086) were selected using a new method developed by Rizzo, Brick, and Park. We assessed group differences for survey process measures, such as the number of attempts to interview and the refusal, response, and cooperation rates. We also examined whether the groups differed in demographic factors, substance use, and mental health. Results: The experimental group had higher rates of refusal and lower response and cooperation rates. Demographic factors and most measures of substance use and mental health did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: The experimental method of within-household selection developed by Rizzo and colleagues does not offer advantages over the classic "next birthday" method. Study limitations are discussed and opportunities for future research are identified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)458-463
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Epidemiology
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Telephone
Substance-Related Disorders
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Mental Health
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interviews
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Data Collection
  • Epidemiologic Methods
  • Interviews
  • Random-Digit Dialing
  • Sampling Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Comparison of Two Within-Household Selection Methods in a Telephone Survey of Substance Abuse and Dependence. / Beebe, Timothy J.; Davern, Michael E.; McAlpine, Donna D.; Ziegenfuss, Jeanette K.

In: Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 17, No. 6, 06.2007, p. 458-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beebe, Timothy J. ; Davern, Michael E. ; McAlpine, Donna D. ; Ziegenfuss, Jeanette K. / Comparison of Two Within-Household Selection Methods in a Telephone Survey of Substance Abuse and Dependence. In: Annals of Epidemiology. 2007 ; Vol. 17, No. 6. pp. 458-463.
@article{e355333f2ab94e1bbf87fc51d6de71d6,
title = "Comparison of Two Within-Household Selection Methods in a Telephone Survey of Substance Abuse and Dependence",
abstract = "Purpose: Random-digit dial telephone surveys often rely on the random selection of one respondent within the household. We compared a new method of within-household selection to a standard {"}next birthday{"} approach on selected survey process measures, respondent characteristics, and substantive results. Methods: From October 2004 through June 2005, we conducted a survey of adults in Minnesota to obtain information about substance use and need for treatment. Control group respondents (n = 1944) were selected using the {"}next birthday{"} method, and experimental group respondents (n = 1086) were selected using a new method developed by Rizzo, Brick, and Park. We assessed group differences for survey process measures, such as the number of attempts to interview and the refusal, response, and cooperation rates. We also examined whether the groups differed in demographic factors, substance use, and mental health. Results: The experimental group had higher rates of refusal and lower response and cooperation rates. Demographic factors and most measures of substance use and mental health did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: The experimental method of within-household selection developed by Rizzo and colleagues does not offer advantages over the classic {"}next birthday{"} method. Study limitations are discussed and opportunities for future research are identified.",
keywords = "Data Collection, Epidemiologic Methods, Interviews, Random-Digit Dialing, Sampling Studies",
author = "Beebe, {Timothy J.} and Davern, {Michael E.} and McAlpine, {Donna D.} and Ziegenfuss, {Jeanette K.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.01.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "458--463",
journal = "Annals of Epidemiology",
issn = "1047-2797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Two Within-Household Selection Methods in a Telephone Survey of Substance Abuse and Dependence

AU - Beebe, Timothy J.

AU - Davern, Michael E.

AU - McAlpine, Donna D.

AU - Ziegenfuss, Jeanette K.

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Purpose: Random-digit dial telephone surveys often rely on the random selection of one respondent within the household. We compared a new method of within-household selection to a standard "next birthday" approach on selected survey process measures, respondent characteristics, and substantive results. Methods: From October 2004 through June 2005, we conducted a survey of adults in Minnesota to obtain information about substance use and need for treatment. Control group respondents (n = 1944) were selected using the "next birthday" method, and experimental group respondents (n = 1086) were selected using a new method developed by Rizzo, Brick, and Park. We assessed group differences for survey process measures, such as the number of attempts to interview and the refusal, response, and cooperation rates. We also examined whether the groups differed in demographic factors, substance use, and mental health. Results: The experimental group had higher rates of refusal and lower response and cooperation rates. Demographic factors and most measures of substance use and mental health did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: The experimental method of within-household selection developed by Rizzo and colleagues does not offer advantages over the classic "next birthday" method. Study limitations are discussed and opportunities for future research are identified.

AB - Purpose: Random-digit dial telephone surveys often rely on the random selection of one respondent within the household. We compared a new method of within-household selection to a standard "next birthday" approach on selected survey process measures, respondent characteristics, and substantive results. Methods: From October 2004 through June 2005, we conducted a survey of adults in Minnesota to obtain information about substance use and need for treatment. Control group respondents (n = 1944) were selected using the "next birthday" method, and experimental group respondents (n = 1086) were selected using a new method developed by Rizzo, Brick, and Park. We assessed group differences for survey process measures, such as the number of attempts to interview and the refusal, response, and cooperation rates. We also examined whether the groups differed in demographic factors, substance use, and mental health. Results: The experimental group had higher rates of refusal and lower response and cooperation rates. Demographic factors and most measures of substance use and mental health did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: The experimental method of within-household selection developed by Rizzo and colleagues does not offer advantages over the classic "next birthday" method. Study limitations are discussed and opportunities for future research are identified.

KW - Data Collection

KW - Epidemiologic Methods

KW - Interviews

KW - Random-Digit Dialing

KW - Sampling Studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248656987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248656987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.01.031

DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.01.031

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 458

EP - 463

JO - Annals of Epidemiology

JF - Annals of Epidemiology

SN - 1047-2797

IS - 6

ER -