Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain

Ralph Gay, Timothy J. Madson, Kathryn R. Cieslak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study compares the sensitivity to change of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) in patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. Methods: This prospective longitudinal study was completed in an outpatient physical therapy clinic. Subjects, with uncomplicated neck pain (no concurrent shoulder pain or nerve root symptoms) for more than a 3-month duration, participated in a 4-week course of therapy that included moist heat, neck exercises, and either mobilization or massage. Outcome measures included standardized response means (sensitivity to change), Cronbach α (internal consistency), and 2-way Spearman correlations between the 2 questionnaires and between a pain Visual Analog Scale and each questionnaire (convergent validity). Results: Mean (SD) score change of the NDI was 6.22 (5.12), and of the NBQ, 14.00 (11.99). Standardized response means were 1.21 and 1.17, respectively. Both questionnaires were more sensitive to change than the pain Visual Analog Scale (0.68). There was moderate correlation between the change scores of all 3 outcome tools (Spearman 0.46-0.57). The NBQ had higher internal consistency than the NDI. Conclusions: The NDI and the NBQ performed comparably in this group of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. Both are sensitive to change and would be efficient outcome tools in studies of chronic neck pain. Both had acceptable internal consistency and are appropriate for use as single-outcome scales.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-262
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2007

Fingerprint

Neck Pain
Neck
Pain Measurement
Surveys and Questionnaires
Shoulder Pain
Massage
Chronic Pain
Longitudinal Studies
Outpatients
Hot Temperature
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Exercise
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Neck Pain
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
  • Questionnaires
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. / Gay, Ralph; Madson, Timothy J.; Cieslak, Kathryn R.

In: Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Vol. 30, No. 4, 01.05.2007, p. 259-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87defc9fe3d945f7b8ceeca15a2c90bb,
title = "Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain",
abstract = "Objective: This study compares the sensitivity to change of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) in patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. Methods: This prospective longitudinal study was completed in an outpatient physical therapy clinic. Subjects, with uncomplicated neck pain (no concurrent shoulder pain or nerve root symptoms) for more than a 3-month duration, participated in a 4-week course of therapy that included moist heat, neck exercises, and either mobilization or massage. Outcome measures included standardized response means (sensitivity to change), Cronbach α (internal consistency), and 2-way Spearman correlations between the 2 questionnaires and between a pain Visual Analog Scale and each questionnaire (convergent validity). Results: Mean (SD) score change of the NDI was 6.22 (5.12), and of the NBQ, 14.00 (11.99). Standardized response means were 1.21 and 1.17, respectively. Both questionnaires were more sensitive to change than the pain Visual Analog Scale (0.68). There was moderate correlation between the change scores of all 3 outcome tools (Spearman 0.46-0.57). The NBQ had higher internal consistency than the NDI. Conclusions: The NDI and the NBQ performed comparably in this group of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. Both are sensitive to change and would be efficient outcome tools in studies of chronic neck pain. Both had acceptable internal consistency and are appropriate for use as single-outcome scales.",
keywords = "Neck Pain, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Questionnaires, Rehabilitation",
author = "Ralph Gay and Madson, {Timothy J.} and Cieslak, {Kathryn R.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "259--262",
journal = "Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics",
issn = "0161-4754",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain

AU - Gay, Ralph

AU - Madson, Timothy J.

AU - Cieslak, Kathryn R.

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - Objective: This study compares the sensitivity to change of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) in patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. Methods: This prospective longitudinal study was completed in an outpatient physical therapy clinic. Subjects, with uncomplicated neck pain (no concurrent shoulder pain or nerve root symptoms) for more than a 3-month duration, participated in a 4-week course of therapy that included moist heat, neck exercises, and either mobilization or massage. Outcome measures included standardized response means (sensitivity to change), Cronbach α (internal consistency), and 2-way Spearman correlations between the 2 questionnaires and between a pain Visual Analog Scale and each questionnaire (convergent validity). Results: Mean (SD) score change of the NDI was 6.22 (5.12), and of the NBQ, 14.00 (11.99). Standardized response means were 1.21 and 1.17, respectively. Both questionnaires were more sensitive to change than the pain Visual Analog Scale (0.68). There was moderate correlation between the change scores of all 3 outcome tools (Spearman 0.46-0.57). The NBQ had higher internal consistency than the NDI. Conclusions: The NDI and the NBQ performed comparably in this group of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. Both are sensitive to change and would be efficient outcome tools in studies of chronic neck pain. Both had acceptable internal consistency and are appropriate for use as single-outcome scales.

AB - Objective: This study compares the sensitivity to change of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) in patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. Methods: This prospective longitudinal study was completed in an outpatient physical therapy clinic. Subjects, with uncomplicated neck pain (no concurrent shoulder pain or nerve root symptoms) for more than a 3-month duration, participated in a 4-week course of therapy that included moist heat, neck exercises, and either mobilization or massage. Outcome measures included standardized response means (sensitivity to change), Cronbach α (internal consistency), and 2-way Spearman correlations between the 2 questionnaires and between a pain Visual Analog Scale and each questionnaire (convergent validity). Results: Mean (SD) score change of the NDI was 6.22 (5.12), and of the NBQ, 14.00 (11.99). Standardized response means were 1.21 and 1.17, respectively. Both questionnaires were more sensitive to change than the pain Visual Analog Scale (0.68). There was moderate correlation between the change scores of all 3 outcome tools (Spearman 0.46-0.57). The NBQ had higher internal consistency than the NDI. Conclusions: The NDI and the NBQ performed comparably in this group of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. Both are sensitive to change and would be efficient outcome tools in studies of chronic neck pain. Both had acceptable internal consistency and are appropriate for use as single-outcome scales.

KW - Neck Pain

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248215068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248215068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 17509434

AN - SCOPUS:34248215068

VL - 30

SP - 259

EP - 262

JO - Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

JF - Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

SN - 0161-4754

IS - 4

ER -