Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy

Donald E. Novicki, Thayne R. Larson, Paul E. Andrews, Scott K. Swanson, Robert G. Ferrigni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the Vest and direct vesicourethral anastomosis for radical prostatectomy. Methods. Five hundred six patients who underwent consecutive radical prostatectomies at our institution were analyzed. Two hundred fifty- nine patients underwent vesicourethral anastomosis using the Vest technique and 247 underwent a direct suture anastomosis. The groups were analyzed relative to time until healing, the occurrence of anastomotic strictures, and the continence rate 1 year after surgery. Results. Approximately twice as many patients who underwent the Vest procedure experienced delayed healing and 8.5% developed anastomotic strictures compared with 1.2% of the direct anastomosis group. The Vest group experienced slightly better urinary continence 1 year postoperatively. Conclusions. The Vest procedure is a reasonable alternative to direct anastomosis for radical prostatectomy and provides similar results. We suggest specific circumstances when the Vest anastomosis may be particularly useful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)732-736
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1997

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Pathologic Constriction
Sutures
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Novicki, D. E., Larson, T. R., Andrews, P. E., Swanson, S. K., & Ferrigni, R. G. (1997). Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology, 49(5), 732-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00066-6

Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy. / Novicki, Donald E.; Larson, Thayne R.; Andrews, Paul E.; Swanson, Scott K.; Ferrigni, Robert G.

In: Urology, Vol. 49, No. 5, 05.1997, p. 732-736.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Novicki, DE, Larson, TR, Andrews, PE, Swanson, SK & Ferrigni, RG 1997, 'Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy', Urology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 732-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00066-6
Novicki, Donald E. ; Larson, Thayne R. ; Andrews, Paul E. ; Swanson, Scott K. ; Ferrigni, Robert G. / Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Urology. 1997 ; Vol. 49, No. 5. pp. 732-736.
@article{33a1d62a20844da3b6a793004c07be65,
title = "Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy",
abstract = "Objectives. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the Vest and direct vesicourethral anastomosis for radical prostatectomy. Methods. Five hundred six patients who underwent consecutive radical prostatectomies at our institution were analyzed. Two hundred fifty- nine patients underwent vesicourethral anastomosis using the Vest technique and 247 underwent a direct suture anastomosis. The groups were analyzed relative to time until healing, the occurrence of anastomotic strictures, and the continence rate 1 year after surgery. Results. Approximately twice as many patients who underwent the Vest procedure experienced delayed healing and 8.5{\%} developed anastomotic strictures compared with 1.2{\%} of the direct anastomosis group. The Vest group experienced slightly better urinary continence 1 year postoperatively. Conclusions. The Vest procedure is a reasonable alternative to direct anastomosis for radical prostatectomy and provides similar results. We suggest specific circumstances when the Vest anastomosis may be particularly useful.",
author = "Novicki, {Donald E.} and Larson, {Thayne R.} and Andrews, {Paul E.} and Swanson, {Scott K.} and Ferrigni, {Robert G.}",
year = "1997",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00066-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "732--736",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy

AU - Novicki, Donald E.

AU - Larson, Thayne R.

AU - Andrews, Paul E.

AU - Swanson, Scott K.

AU - Ferrigni, Robert G.

PY - 1997/5

Y1 - 1997/5

N2 - Objectives. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the Vest and direct vesicourethral anastomosis for radical prostatectomy. Methods. Five hundred six patients who underwent consecutive radical prostatectomies at our institution were analyzed. Two hundred fifty- nine patients underwent vesicourethral anastomosis using the Vest technique and 247 underwent a direct suture anastomosis. The groups were analyzed relative to time until healing, the occurrence of anastomotic strictures, and the continence rate 1 year after surgery. Results. Approximately twice as many patients who underwent the Vest procedure experienced delayed healing and 8.5% developed anastomotic strictures compared with 1.2% of the direct anastomosis group. The Vest group experienced slightly better urinary continence 1 year postoperatively. Conclusions. The Vest procedure is a reasonable alternative to direct anastomosis for radical prostatectomy and provides similar results. We suggest specific circumstances when the Vest anastomosis may be particularly useful.

AB - Objectives. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the Vest and direct vesicourethral anastomosis for radical prostatectomy. Methods. Five hundred six patients who underwent consecutive radical prostatectomies at our institution were analyzed. Two hundred fifty- nine patients underwent vesicourethral anastomosis using the Vest technique and 247 underwent a direct suture anastomosis. The groups were analyzed relative to time until healing, the occurrence of anastomotic strictures, and the continence rate 1 year after surgery. Results. Approximately twice as many patients who underwent the Vest procedure experienced delayed healing and 8.5% developed anastomotic strictures compared with 1.2% of the direct anastomosis group. The Vest group experienced slightly better urinary continence 1 year postoperatively. Conclusions. The Vest procedure is a reasonable alternative to direct anastomosis for radical prostatectomy and provides similar results. We suggest specific circumstances when the Vest anastomosis may be particularly useful.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030902135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030902135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00066-6

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00066-6

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 732

EP - 736

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 5

ER -