Comparison of the mechanical performance of three types of external fixators: linear, circular and hybrid

VL L. Caja, W. Kim, S. Larsson, EYS Chao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Different configurations of the Monticelli-Spinelli and Ilizarov external fixation systems were tested to define their mechanical properties. In five configurations the external fixator consisted of rings with tensioned wires (circular), while in one configuration two pairs of the tensioned wires and their correspondent ring were replaced by threaded pins (hybrid). Testing was performed in axial compression, bending and torsion. The results were compared to the characteristics of a selected linear fixator group. Both the circular and the hybrid configurations were non-linear in compression. In bending, circular fixators had a similar pattern in both anteroposterior and oblique loading directions. The bending load-displacement pattern for the hybrid fixators was similar to the linear fixators, higher stiffness in the plane of the pins. Torsion was linear for both circular and hybrid fixators, as for the linear fixators. By combination of wires and pins (hybrid configuration), the mechanical behaviour had characteristics from both linear and circular fixators. It is concluded that the three studied groups own different mechanical performance and can be considered as different types of fixators. While it has been demonstrated that osteogenesis can be achieved independently of the mechanical behaviour of the fixator, this study supports the suggestion that some complications can be related to the mechanical behaviour of the fixator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-406
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume10
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • comparison
  • External fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this