TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Small Versus Large Volume Split Dose Preparation for Colonoscopy
T2 - A Study of Colonoscopy Outcomes
AU - Siddiki, Hassan
AU - Ravi, Sreya
AU - Al-Qaisi, Mohanad T.
AU - Fath, Ayman R.
AU - Ramirez, Francisco
AU - Crowell, Michael D.
AU - Pannala, Rahul
AU - Faigel, Douglas O.
AU - Gurudu, Suryakanth R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Background: Split dose bowel preparations (SDP) have superior outcomes for colonoscopy as compared to evening before regimens. However, the association of the actual volume of the SDP to colonoscopy outcome measures has not been well studied. Aims: Compare adenoma detection rate (ADR), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SDR), mean bowel cleanse score, and predictors of inadequate exams between small volume SDP and large volume SDP. Methods: We have conducted a retrospective study in patients undergoing colonoscopy with small volume SDP versus large volume SDP between July 2014 and December 2014. Basic demographics (age, gender and BMI) along with clinical co-morbidities were recorded. Quality of the bowel preparation, ADR and SDR was compared between these groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the determinants of inadequate exams in each group. Results: 1573 patients with split dose preparation were included in this retrospective study. 58.4% (920/1573) patients took small volume SDP. There was no difference in ADR (37.9 vs. 38.8%, p = 0.2); however, SDR was higher for small volume SDP compared to large volume SDP (11.9 vs. 7.9% p = 0.005). There was no difference in the rate of inadequate exams between the two groups (p = 0.7). A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in the small volume SDP. Conclusions: SDR was higher in small volume SDP. There was no difference in rate of inadequate exams between the two groups. A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in patients with the small volume SDP.
AB - Background: Split dose bowel preparations (SDP) have superior outcomes for colonoscopy as compared to evening before regimens. However, the association of the actual volume of the SDP to colonoscopy outcome measures has not been well studied. Aims: Compare adenoma detection rate (ADR), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SDR), mean bowel cleanse score, and predictors of inadequate exams between small volume SDP and large volume SDP. Methods: We have conducted a retrospective study in patients undergoing colonoscopy with small volume SDP versus large volume SDP between July 2014 and December 2014. Basic demographics (age, gender and BMI) along with clinical co-morbidities were recorded. Quality of the bowel preparation, ADR and SDR was compared between these groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the determinants of inadequate exams in each group. Results: 1573 patients with split dose preparation were included in this retrospective study. 58.4% (920/1573) patients took small volume SDP. There was no difference in ADR (37.9 vs. 38.8%, p = 0.2); however, SDR was higher for small volume SDP compared to large volume SDP (11.9 vs. 7.9% p = 0.005). There was no difference in the rate of inadequate exams between the two groups (p = 0.7). A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in the small volume SDP. Conclusions: SDR was higher in small volume SDP. There was no difference in rate of inadequate exams between the two groups. A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in patients with the small volume SDP.
KW - Adenoma detection rate
KW - Colonoscopy
KW - Quality of the preparation
KW - Split-dose preparation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046538774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046538774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10620-018-5102-8
DO - 10.1007/s10620-018-5102-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 29736830
AN - SCOPUS:85046538774
SN - 0163-2116
VL - 63
SP - 2413
EP - 2418
JO - Digestive diseases and sciences
JF - Digestive diseases and sciences
IS - 9
ER -