Comparison of Small Versus Large Volume Split Dose Preparation for Colonoscopy

A Study of Colonoscopy Outcomes

Hassan Siddiki, Sreya Ravi, Mohanad T. Al-Qaisi, Ayman R. Fath, Francisco C Ramirez, Michael D. Crowell, Rahul Pannala, Douglas Orrick Faigel, Suryakanth R. Gurudu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Split dose bowel preparations (SDP) have superior outcomes for colonoscopy as compared to evening before regimens. However, the association of the actual volume of the SDP to colonoscopy outcome measures has not been well studied. Aims: Compare adenoma detection rate (ADR), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SDR), mean bowel cleanse score, and predictors of inadequate exams between small volume SDP and large volume SDP. Methods: We have conducted a retrospective study in patients undergoing colonoscopy with small volume SDP versus large volume SDP between July 2014 and December 2014. Basic demographics (age, gender and BMI) along with clinical co-morbidities were recorded. Quality of the bowel preparation, ADR and SDR was compared between these groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the determinants of inadequate exams in each group. Results: 1573 patients with split dose preparation were included in this retrospective study. 58.4% (920/1573) patients took small volume SDP. There was no difference in ADR (37.9 vs. 38.8%, p = 0.2); however, SDR was higher for small volume SDP compared to large volume SDP (11.9 vs. 7.9% p = 0.005). There was no difference in the rate of inadequate exams between the two groups (p = 0.7). A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in the small volume SDP. Conclusions: SDR was higher in small volume SDP. There was no difference in rate of inadequate exams between the two groups. A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in patients with the small volume SDP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalDigestive Diseases and Sciences
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 7 2018

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Polyps
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Adenoma
Constipation
Retrospective Studies
Logistic Models
Demography
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Adenoma detection rate
  • Colonoscopy
  • Quality of the preparation
  • Split-dose preparation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Comparison of Small Versus Large Volume Split Dose Preparation for Colonoscopy : A Study of Colonoscopy Outcomes. / Siddiki, Hassan; Ravi, Sreya; Al-Qaisi, Mohanad T.; Fath, Ayman R.; Ramirez, Francisco C; Crowell, Michael D.; Pannala, Rahul; Faigel, Douglas Orrick; Gurudu, Suryakanth R.

In: Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 07.05.2018, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Siddiki, Hassan ; Ravi, Sreya ; Al-Qaisi, Mohanad T. ; Fath, Ayman R. ; Ramirez, Francisco C ; Crowell, Michael D. ; Pannala, Rahul ; Faigel, Douglas Orrick ; Gurudu, Suryakanth R. / Comparison of Small Versus Large Volume Split Dose Preparation for Colonoscopy : A Study of Colonoscopy Outcomes. In: Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2018 ; pp. 1-6.
@article{11af725476dd4573bf164d59f9bb386b,
title = "Comparison of Small Versus Large Volume Split Dose Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Study of Colonoscopy Outcomes",
abstract = "Background: Split dose bowel preparations (SDP) have superior outcomes for colonoscopy as compared to evening before regimens. However, the association of the actual volume of the SDP to colonoscopy outcome measures has not been well studied. Aims: Compare adenoma detection rate (ADR), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SDR), mean bowel cleanse score, and predictors of inadequate exams between small volume SDP and large volume SDP. Methods: We have conducted a retrospective study in patients undergoing colonoscopy with small volume SDP versus large volume SDP between July 2014 and December 2014. Basic demographics (age, gender and BMI) along with clinical co-morbidities were recorded. Quality of the bowel preparation, ADR and SDR was compared between these groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the determinants of inadequate exams in each group. Results: 1573 patients with split dose preparation were included in this retrospective study. 58.4{\%} (920/1573) patients took small volume SDP. There was no difference in ADR (37.9 vs. 38.8{\%}, p = 0.2); however, SDR was higher for small volume SDP compared to large volume SDP (11.9 vs. 7.9{\%} p = 0.005). There was no difference in the rate of inadequate exams between the two groups (p = 0.7). A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in the small volume SDP. Conclusions: SDR was higher in small volume SDP. There was no difference in rate of inadequate exams between the two groups. A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in patients with the small volume SDP.",
keywords = "Adenoma detection rate, Colonoscopy, Quality of the preparation, Split-dose preparation",
author = "Hassan Siddiki and Sreya Ravi and Al-Qaisi, {Mohanad T.} and Fath, {Ayman R.} and Ramirez, {Francisco C} and Crowell, {Michael D.} and Rahul Pannala and Faigel, {Douglas Orrick} and Gurudu, {Suryakanth R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10620-018-5102-8",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Digestive Diseases and Sciences",
issn = "0163-2116",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Small Versus Large Volume Split Dose Preparation for Colonoscopy

T2 - A Study of Colonoscopy Outcomes

AU - Siddiki, Hassan

AU - Ravi, Sreya

AU - Al-Qaisi, Mohanad T.

AU - Fath, Ayman R.

AU - Ramirez, Francisco C

AU - Crowell, Michael D.

AU - Pannala, Rahul

AU - Faigel, Douglas Orrick

AU - Gurudu, Suryakanth R.

PY - 2018/5/7

Y1 - 2018/5/7

N2 - Background: Split dose bowel preparations (SDP) have superior outcomes for colonoscopy as compared to evening before regimens. However, the association of the actual volume of the SDP to colonoscopy outcome measures has not been well studied. Aims: Compare adenoma detection rate (ADR), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SDR), mean bowel cleanse score, and predictors of inadequate exams between small volume SDP and large volume SDP. Methods: We have conducted a retrospective study in patients undergoing colonoscopy with small volume SDP versus large volume SDP between July 2014 and December 2014. Basic demographics (age, gender and BMI) along with clinical co-morbidities were recorded. Quality of the bowel preparation, ADR and SDR was compared between these groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the determinants of inadequate exams in each group. Results: 1573 patients with split dose preparation were included in this retrospective study. 58.4% (920/1573) patients took small volume SDP. There was no difference in ADR (37.9 vs. 38.8%, p = 0.2); however, SDR was higher for small volume SDP compared to large volume SDP (11.9 vs. 7.9% p = 0.005). There was no difference in the rate of inadequate exams between the two groups (p = 0.7). A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in the small volume SDP. Conclusions: SDR was higher in small volume SDP. There was no difference in rate of inadequate exams between the two groups. A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in patients with the small volume SDP.

AB - Background: Split dose bowel preparations (SDP) have superior outcomes for colonoscopy as compared to evening before regimens. However, the association of the actual volume of the SDP to colonoscopy outcome measures has not been well studied. Aims: Compare adenoma detection rate (ADR), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SDR), mean bowel cleanse score, and predictors of inadequate exams between small volume SDP and large volume SDP. Methods: We have conducted a retrospective study in patients undergoing colonoscopy with small volume SDP versus large volume SDP between July 2014 and December 2014. Basic demographics (age, gender and BMI) along with clinical co-morbidities were recorded. Quality of the bowel preparation, ADR and SDR was compared between these groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the determinants of inadequate exams in each group. Results: 1573 patients with split dose preparation were included in this retrospective study. 58.4% (920/1573) patients took small volume SDP. There was no difference in ADR (37.9 vs. 38.8%, p = 0.2); however, SDR was higher for small volume SDP compared to large volume SDP (11.9 vs. 7.9% p = 0.005). There was no difference in the rate of inadequate exams between the two groups (p = 0.7). A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in the small volume SDP. Conclusions: SDR was higher in small volume SDP. There was no difference in rate of inadequate exams between the two groups. A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in patients with the small volume SDP.

KW - Adenoma detection rate

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Quality of the preparation

KW - Split-dose preparation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046538774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046538774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10620-018-5102-8

DO - 10.1007/s10620-018-5102-8

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

JF - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

SN - 0163-2116

ER -