Comparison of rates and outcomes of readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery

Syed Nabeel Zafar, Adil A. Shah, Hira Channa, Mustafa Raoof, Lori Wilson, Nabil Wasif

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Increasing regionalization of cancer surgery has the inadvertent potential to lead to fragmentation of care if readmissions occur at a facility other than the index hospital. Themagnitude and adverse effects of readmission to a facility other than the one where the surgery was performed are unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess rates of readmission to nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery and to compare outcomes between index and nonindex hospital readmissions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this multicenter, population-based, nationally representative study of adult patients undergoing a major cancer operation (defined as esophagectomies or gastrectomies, hepaticobiliary resections, pancreatectomies, colorectal resections, or cystectomies), retrospective analyses were performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (admissions from January 1 through September 30, 2013). Descriptive analyses were performed to determine 90-day readmission characteristics, including timing, cost, and outcomes. Adjusting for clustering by facility, the study used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with nonindex vs index readmissions. The study also used regression models to identify differences in mortality, major complications, and subsequent readmissions between the 2 groups. Data analysis was performed from January 1 through December 31, 2013. EXPOSURES Readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals (defined as any hospital other than the hospital where the major cancer operation was performed). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Proportion of 90-day readmissions and nonindex readmissions after major cancer surgery, factors associated with nonindex readmissions, and difference between in-hospital mortality, hospital costs, and subsequent readmissions for patients admitted to index vs nonindex hospitals. RESULTS A total of 60 970 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 67 [13] years; 7619 [55.6%] male and 6075 [44.4%] female). The 90-day readmission rate was 23.0%. Of the 13 695 first readmissions, 20.1%were to a nonindex hospital. Independent factors associated with readmission to a nonindex hospital included type of procedure, comorbidities (OR, 1.40; 95%CI, 1.15-1.70), elective admission (OR, 1.21; 95%CI, 1.06-1.37), discharge to a nursing facility (OR, 1.20; 95%CI, 1.07-1.36), and surgery at a teaching hospital (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.34) (all P <.05). After risk adjustment, patients readmitted to nonindex hospitals had 31.2%higher odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.31; 95%CI, 1.05-1.64) and 27.3%higher odds of having a major complication (odds ratio, 1.27; 95%CI, 1.14-1.42). Subsequent readmissions and hospital costs were not different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Approximately one-fifth of readmissions were to a nonindex hospital and were associated with higher mortality and morbidity than readmission to index hospitals. Factors that influence nonindex readmissions have been identified to target interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)719-727
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA Surgery
Volume153
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Patient Readmission
Hospital Costs
Mortality
Odds Ratio
Risk Adjustment
Cancer Care Facilities
Pancreatectomy
Esophagectomy
Cystectomy
Gastrectomy
Hospital Mortality
Teaching Hospitals
Cluster Analysis
Comorbidity
Nursing
Logistic Models
Databases
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of rates and outcomes of readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery. / Zafar, Syed Nabeel; Shah, Adil A.; Channa, Hira; Raoof, Mustafa; Wilson, Lori; Wasif, Nabil.

In: JAMA Surgery, Vol. 153, No. 8, 01.08.2018, p. 719-727.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zafar, Syed Nabeel ; Shah, Adil A. ; Channa, Hira ; Raoof, Mustafa ; Wilson, Lori ; Wasif, Nabil. / Comparison of rates and outcomes of readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery. In: JAMA Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 153, No. 8. pp. 719-727.
@article{ad22910435044bdda4e1270b1184b14e,
title = "Comparison of rates and outcomes of readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE Increasing regionalization of cancer surgery has the inadvertent potential to lead to fragmentation of care if readmissions occur at a facility other than the index hospital. Themagnitude and adverse effects of readmission to a facility other than the one where the surgery was performed are unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess rates of readmission to nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery and to compare outcomes between index and nonindex hospital readmissions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this multicenter, population-based, nationally representative study of adult patients undergoing a major cancer operation (defined as esophagectomies or gastrectomies, hepaticobiliary resections, pancreatectomies, colorectal resections, or cystectomies), retrospective analyses were performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (admissions from January 1 through September 30, 2013). Descriptive analyses were performed to determine 90-day readmission characteristics, including timing, cost, and outcomes. Adjusting for clustering by facility, the study used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with nonindex vs index readmissions. The study also used regression models to identify differences in mortality, major complications, and subsequent readmissions between the 2 groups. Data analysis was performed from January 1 through December 31, 2013. EXPOSURES Readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals (defined as any hospital other than the hospital where the major cancer operation was performed). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Proportion of 90-day readmissions and nonindex readmissions after major cancer surgery, factors associated with nonindex readmissions, and difference between in-hospital mortality, hospital costs, and subsequent readmissions for patients admitted to index vs nonindex hospitals. RESULTS A total of 60 970 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 67 [13] years; 7619 [55.6{\%}] male and 6075 [44.4{\%}] female). The 90-day readmission rate was 23.0{\%}. Of the 13 695 first readmissions, 20.1{\%}were to a nonindex hospital. Independent factors associated with readmission to a nonindex hospital included type of procedure, comorbidities (OR, 1.40; 95{\%}CI, 1.15-1.70), elective admission (OR, 1.21; 95{\%}CI, 1.06-1.37), discharge to a nursing facility (OR, 1.20; 95{\%}CI, 1.07-1.36), and surgery at a teaching hospital (OR, 1.16; 95{\%} CI, 1.00-1.34) (all P <.05). After risk adjustment, patients readmitted to nonindex hospitals had 31.2{\%}higher odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.31; 95{\%}CI, 1.05-1.64) and 27.3{\%}higher odds of having a major complication (odds ratio, 1.27; 95{\%}CI, 1.14-1.42). Subsequent readmissions and hospital costs were not different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Approximately one-fifth of readmissions were to a nonindex hospital and were associated with higher mortality and morbidity than readmission to index hospitals. Factors that influence nonindex readmissions have been identified to target interventions.",
author = "Zafar, {Syed Nabeel} and Shah, {Adil A.} and Hira Channa and Mustafa Raoof and Lori Wilson and Nabil Wasif",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0380",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "153",
pages = "719--727",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of rates and outcomes of readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery

AU - Zafar, Syed Nabeel

AU - Shah, Adil A.

AU - Channa, Hira

AU - Raoof, Mustafa

AU - Wilson, Lori

AU - Wasif, Nabil

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE Increasing regionalization of cancer surgery has the inadvertent potential to lead to fragmentation of care if readmissions occur at a facility other than the index hospital. Themagnitude and adverse effects of readmission to a facility other than the one where the surgery was performed are unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess rates of readmission to nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery and to compare outcomes between index and nonindex hospital readmissions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this multicenter, population-based, nationally representative study of adult patients undergoing a major cancer operation (defined as esophagectomies or gastrectomies, hepaticobiliary resections, pancreatectomies, colorectal resections, or cystectomies), retrospective analyses were performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (admissions from January 1 through September 30, 2013). Descriptive analyses were performed to determine 90-day readmission characteristics, including timing, cost, and outcomes. Adjusting for clustering by facility, the study used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with nonindex vs index readmissions. The study also used regression models to identify differences in mortality, major complications, and subsequent readmissions between the 2 groups. Data analysis was performed from January 1 through December 31, 2013. EXPOSURES Readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals (defined as any hospital other than the hospital where the major cancer operation was performed). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Proportion of 90-day readmissions and nonindex readmissions after major cancer surgery, factors associated with nonindex readmissions, and difference between in-hospital mortality, hospital costs, and subsequent readmissions for patients admitted to index vs nonindex hospitals. RESULTS A total of 60 970 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 67 [13] years; 7619 [55.6%] male and 6075 [44.4%] female). The 90-day readmission rate was 23.0%. Of the 13 695 first readmissions, 20.1%were to a nonindex hospital. Independent factors associated with readmission to a nonindex hospital included type of procedure, comorbidities (OR, 1.40; 95%CI, 1.15-1.70), elective admission (OR, 1.21; 95%CI, 1.06-1.37), discharge to a nursing facility (OR, 1.20; 95%CI, 1.07-1.36), and surgery at a teaching hospital (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.34) (all P <.05). After risk adjustment, patients readmitted to nonindex hospitals had 31.2%higher odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.31; 95%CI, 1.05-1.64) and 27.3%higher odds of having a major complication (odds ratio, 1.27; 95%CI, 1.14-1.42). Subsequent readmissions and hospital costs were not different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Approximately one-fifth of readmissions were to a nonindex hospital and were associated with higher mortality and morbidity than readmission to index hospitals. Factors that influence nonindex readmissions have been identified to target interventions.

AB - IMPORTANCE Increasing regionalization of cancer surgery has the inadvertent potential to lead to fragmentation of care if readmissions occur at a facility other than the index hospital. Themagnitude and adverse effects of readmission to a facility other than the one where the surgery was performed are unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess rates of readmission to nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery and to compare outcomes between index and nonindex hospital readmissions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this multicenter, population-based, nationally representative study of adult patients undergoing a major cancer operation (defined as esophagectomies or gastrectomies, hepaticobiliary resections, pancreatectomies, colorectal resections, or cystectomies), retrospective analyses were performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (admissions from January 1 through September 30, 2013). Descriptive analyses were performed to determine 90-day readmission characteristics, including timing, cost, and outcomes. Adjusting for clustering by facility, the study used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with nonindex vs index readmissions. The study also used regression models to identify differences in mortality, major complications, and subsequent readmissions between the 2 groups. Data analysis was performed from January 1 through December 31, 2013. EXPOSURES Readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals (defined as any hospital other than the hospital where the major cancer operation was performed). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Proportion of 90-day readmissions and nonindex readmissions after major cancer surgery, factors associated with nonindex readmissions, and difference between in-hospital mortality, hospital costs, and subsequent readmissions for patients admitted to index vs nonindex hospitals. RESULTS A total of 60 970 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 67 [13] years; 7619 [55.6%] male and 6075 [44.4%] female). The 90-day readmission rate was 23.0%. Of the 13 695 first readmissions, 20.1%were to a nonindex hospital. Independent factors associated with readmission to a nonindex hospital included type of procedure, comorbidities (OR, 1.40; 95%CI, 1.15-1.70), elective admission (OR, 1.21; 95%CI, 1.06-1.37), discharge to a nursing facility (OR, 1.20; 95%CI, 1.07-1.36), and surgery at a teaching hospital (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.34) (all P <.05). After risk adjustment, patients readmitted to nonindex hospitals had 31.2%higher odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.31; 95%CI, 1.05-1.64) and 27.3%higher odds of having a major complication (odds ratio, 1.27; 95%CI, 1.14-1.42). Subsequent readmissions and hospital costs were not different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Approximately one-fifth of readmissions were to a nonindex hospital and were associated with higher mortality and morbidity than readmission to index hospitals. Factors that influence nonindex readmissions have been identified to target interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051577568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051577568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0380

DO - 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0380

M3 - Article

C2 - 29641833

AN - SCOPUS:85051577568

VL - 153

SP - 719

EP - 727

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 8

ER -