Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review

W. Douglas Weaver, R. John Simes, Amadeo Betriu, Cindy L. Grines, Felix Zijlstra, Eulogio Garcia, Lilliana Grinfeld, Raymond J. Gibbons, Expedito E. Ribeiro, Marcus A. DeWood, Flavio Ribichini

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

970 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective.-To provide a quantitative review of the treatment effects of primary coronary angioplasty vs intravenous thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Data Sources.-Ten randomized trials were identified through computerized bibliographic search of MEDLINE from January 1985 through March 1996 and by queries of principal investigators. Study Selection.-Single- center and multicenter randomized trials comparing primary angioplasty with intravenous thrombolytic therapy among 2606 patients were included. Four trials compared angioplasty with streptokinase, 3 compared angioplasty with a 3- to 4-hour infusion of tissue-type plasminogen activator, and 3 compared angioplasty with 'accelerated' administration of tissue-type plasminogen activator over 90 minutes. Data Extraction.-Each investigator provided definitions and exact data for outcome events. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (Cls), and P values were calculated using exact tests for categorical data. Data Synthesis.-Mortality at 30 days or less was 4.4% for the 1290 patients treated with primary angioplasty compared with 6.5% for the 1316 patients treated with thrombolysis (34% reduction; OR, 0.66; 95% Cl, 0.46-0.94; P=.02). The effect was similar among thrombolytic regimens, and no subgroup demonstrated a significant reduction in death. The rates of death or nonfatal reinfarction were 7.2% for angioplasty and 11.9% for thrombolytic therapy (OR, 0.58; 95% Cl, 0.44-0.76; P<.001). Angioplasty was associated with a significant reduction in total stroke (0.7% vs 2.0%; P=.007) and hemorrhagic stroke (0.1% vs 1.1%; P<.001). Conclusions.-Based on outcomes at hospital discharge or 30 days, primary angioplasty appears to be superior to thrombolytic therapy for treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction, with the proviso that success rates for angioplasty are as good as those achieved in these trials. Data evaluating longer-term outcomes, operator experience, and time delay before treatment are needed before primary angioplasty can be universally recommended as the preferred treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2093-2098
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume278
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 17 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Weaver, W. D., Simes, R. J., Betriu, A., Grines, C. L., Zijlstra, F., Garcia, E., Grinfeld, L., Gibbons, R. J., Ribeiro, E. E., DeWood, M. A., & Ribichini, F. (1997). Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(23), 2093-2098. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.278.23.2093