Comparison of multivariate tests for genetic linkage

Christopher I. Amos, Mariza De Andrade, Dakai K. Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Multivariate tests for linkage can provide improved power over univariate tests but the type I error rates and comparative power of commonly used methods have not previously been compared. Here we studied the behavior of bivariate formulations of the variance component (VC) and Haseman-Elston (H-E) approaches. Methods: We compared through simulation studies the bivariate H-E test with the unconstrained bivariate VC approach and with a VC approach in which the major-gene correlation is constrained to ± 1. We also compared these methods to univariate methods. Results: Bivariate approaches are more powerful than univariate analyses unless the traits are very highly positively correlated. The power of the bivariate H-E test was less than the VC procedures. The constrained test was often less powerful than the unconstrained test. The empirical distributions of the bivariate H-E test and the unconstrained bivariate VC test conformed with asymptotic distributions for samples of 100 or more sibships of size 4. Conclusions: The unconstrained VC test is valuable for testing for preliminary linkages using multivariate phenotypes. The bivariate H-E test was less powerful than the bivariate VC tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-144
Number of pages12
JournalHuman Heredity
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Genetic Linkage
Phenotype
Genes

Keywords

  • Linkage
  • Multivariate analysis
  • Statistical genetics
  • Variance components

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Comparison of multivariate tests for genetic linkage. / Amos, Christopher I.; De Andrade, Mariza; Zhu, Dakai K.

In: Human Heredity, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2001, p. 133-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Amos, Christopher I. ; De Andrade, Mariza ; Zhu, Dakai K. / Comparison of multivariate tests for genetic linkage. In: Human Heredity. 2001 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 133-144.
@article{33827e521bac421f9f5996f2a1666fe4,
title = "Comparison of multivariate tests for genetic linkage",
abstract = "Objectives: Multivariate tests for linkage can provide improved power over univariate tests but the type I error rates and comparative power of commonly used methods have not previously been compared. Here we studied the behavior of bivariate formulations of the variance component (VC) and Haseman-Elston (H-E) approaches. Methods: We compared through simulation studies the bivariate H-E test with the unconstrained bivariate VC approach and with a VC approach in which the major-gene correlation is constrained to ± 1. We also compared these methods to univariate methods. Results: Bivariate approaches are more powerful than univariate analyses unless the traits are very highly positively correlated. The power of the bivariate H-E test was less than the VC procedures. The constrained test was often less powerful than the unconstrained test. The empirical distributions of the bivariate H-E test and the unconstrained bivariate VC test conformed with asymptotic distributions for samples of 100 or more sibships of size 4. Conclusions: The unconstrained VC test is valuable for testing for preliminary linkages using multivariate phenotypes. The bivariate H-E test was less powerful than the bivariate VC tests.",
keywords = "Linkage, Multivariate analysis, Statistical genetics, Variance components",
author = "Amos, {Christopher I.} and {De Andrade}, Mariza and Zhu, {Dakai K.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1159/000053334",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "133--144",
journal = "Human Heredity",
issn = "0001-5652",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of multivariate tests for genetic linkage

AU - Amos, Christopher I.

AU - De Andrade, Mariza

AU - Zhu, Dakai K.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objectives: Multivariate tests for linkage can provide improved power over univariate tests but the type I error rates and comparative power of commonly used methods have not previously been compared. Here we studied the behavior of bivariate formulations of the variance component (VC) and Haseman-Elston (H-E) approaches. Methods: We compared through simulation studies the bivariate H-E test with the unconstrained bivariate VC approach and with a VC approach in which the major-gene correlation is constrained to ± 1. We also compared these methods to univariate methods. Results: Bivariate approaches are more powerful than univariate analyses unless the traits are very highly positively correlated. The power of the bivariate H-E test was less than the VC procedures. The constrained test was often less powerful than the unconstrained test. The empirical distributions of the bivariate H-E test and the unconstrained bivariate VC test conformed with asymptotic distributions for samples of 100 or more sibships of size 4. Conclusions: The unconstrained VC test is valuable for testing for preliminary linkages using multivariate phenotypes. The bivariate H-E test was less powerful than the bivariate VC tests.

AB - Objectives: Multivariate tests for linkage can provide improved power over univariate tests but the type I error rates and comparative power of commonly used methods have not previously been compared. Here we studied the behavior of bivariate formulations of the variance component (VC) and Haseman-Elston (H-E) approaches. Methods: We compared through simulation studies the bivariate H-E test with the unconstrained bivariate VC approach and with a VC approach in which the major-gene correlation is constrained to ± 1. We also compared these methods to univariate methods. Results: Bivariate approaches are more powerful than univariate analyses unless the traits are very highly positively correlated. The power of the bivariate H-E test was less than the VC procedures. The constrained test was often less powerful than the unconstrained test. The empirical distributions of the bivariate H-E test and the unconstrained bivariate VC test conformed with asymptotic distributions for samples of 100 or more sibships of size 4. Conclusions: The unconstrained VC test is valuable for testing for preliminary linkages using multivariate phenotypes. The bivariate H-E test was less powerful than the bivariate VC tests.

KW - Linkage

KW - Multivariate analysis

KW - Statistical genetics

KW - Variance components

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035101150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035101150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000053334

DO - 10.1159/000053334

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 133

EP - 144

JO - Human Heredity

JF - Human Heredity

SN - 0001-5652

IS - 3

ER -