Comparison of measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by Tc- 99m sestamibi first-pass angiography with electron beam computed tomography in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction

Thomas C. Gerber, Thomas Behrenbeck, Thomas Allison, Brian P. Mullan, John A. Rumberger, Raymond J Gibbons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare measurements of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by first-pass radionuclide angiography ('first- pass angiography') using technetium-99m (Tc-99m) sestamibi with those by contrast-enhanced electron beam computed tomography ('electron beam tomography') as a reference technique in patients with an anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Twenty-five patients with first Q-wave anterior wall AMI underwent paired electron beam tomographic and first-pass angiographic studies (mean, 1 day apart). Fourteen patients had 2 sets of measurements of the LVEF obtained by both methods (separated by at least 6 weeks), for a total of 39 paired measurements. LVEF by electron beam tomography was calculated from absolute systolic and diastolic LV chamber volumes. LV volumes by electron beam tomography were 199 ± 51 ml at end- diastole and 111 ± 42 ml at end-systole. Mean LVEF was 45 ± 11% by first- pass tomography and 46 ± 9% by electron beam tomography. The linear correlation coefficient between both methods was 0.82 (p <0.0001), with slope = 1.0, y-intercept = -1.1, and SEE = 6.1. The mean difference between the 2 methods was -0.7 ± 6.0 EF units (p = 0.75). The correlation between the differences and means of both methods was 0.34 (p = 0.04), indicating a trend for first-pass angiography to overestimate LVEF in the higher range. LVEFs measured by first-pass angiography in patients with abnormal LV geometry and contraction patterns caused by anterior wall AMI agree well with those measured by electron beam tomography in the clinically relevant range.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1022-1026
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume83
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 1999

Fingerprint

Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction
X Ray Computed Tomography
Stroke Volume
Angiography
First-Pass Ventriculography
Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi
Diastole
Systole
Tomography
Electrons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by Tc- 99m sestamibi first-pass angiography with electron beam computed tomography in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. / Gerber, Thomas C.; Behrenbeck, Thomas; Allison, Thomas; Mullan, Brian P.; Rumberger, John A.; Gibbons, Raymond J.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 83, No. 7, 01.04.1999, p. 1022-1026.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0cf92ec8afe14a54973d0efcebb43edf,
title = "Comparison of measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by Tc- 99m sestamibi first-pass angiography with electron beam computed tomography in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction",
abstract = "The goal of this study was to compare measurements of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by first-pass radionuclide angiography ('first- pass angiography') using technetium-99m (Tc-99m) sestamibi with those by contrast-enhanced electron beam computed tomography ('electron beam tomography') as a reference technique in patients with an anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Twenty-five patients with first Q-wave anterior wall AMI underwent paired electron beam tomographic and first-pass angiographic studies (mean, 1 day apart). Fourteen patients had 2 sets of measurements of the LVEF obtained by both methods (separated by at least 6 weeks), for a total of 39 paired measurements. LVEF by electron beam tomography was calculated from absolute systolic and diastolic LV chamber volumes. LV volumes by electron beam tomography were 199 ± 51 ml at end- diastole and 111 ± 42 ml at end-systole. Mean LVEF was 45 ± 11{\%} by first- pass tomography and 46 ± 9{\%} by electron beam tomography. The linear correlation coefficient between both methods was 0.82 (p <0.0001), with slope = 1.0, y-intercept = -1.1, and SEE = 6.1. The mean difference between the 2 methods was -0.7 ± 6.0 EF units (p = 0.75). The correlation between the differences and means of both methods was 0.34 (p = 0.04), indicating a trend for first-pass angiography to overestimate LVEF in the higher range. LVEFs measured by first-pass angiography in patients with abnormal LV geometry and contraction patterns caused by anterior wall AMI agree well with those measured by electron beam tomography in the clinically relevant range.",
author = "Gerber, {Thomas C.} and Thomas Behrenbeck and Thomas Allison and Mullan, {Brian P.} and Rumberger, {John A.} and Gibbons, {Raymond J}",
year = "1999",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00008-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "1022--1026",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by Tc- 99m sestamibi first-pass angiography with electron beam computed tomography in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction

AU - Gerber, Thomas C.

AU - Behrenbeck, Thomas

AU - Allison, Thomas

AU - Mullan, Brian P.

AU - Rumberger, John A.

AU - Gibbons, Raymond J

PY - 1999/4/1

Y1 - 1999/4/1

N2 - The goal of this study was to compare measurements of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by first-pass radionuclide angiography ('first- pass angiography') using technetium-99m (Tc-99m) sestamibi with those by contrast-enhanced electron beam computed tomography ('electron beam tomography') as a reference technique in patients with an anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Twenty-five patients with first Q-wave anterior wall AMI underwent paired electron beam tomographic and first-pass angiographic studies (mean, 1 day apart). Fourteen patients had 2 sets of measurements of the LVEF obtained by both methods (separated by at least 6 weeks), for a total of 39 paired measurements. LVEF by electron beam tomography was calculated from absolute systolic and diastolic LV chamber volumes. LV volumes by electron beam tomography were 199 ± 51 ml at end- diastole and 111 ± 42 ml at end-systole. Mean LVEF was 45 ± 11% by first- pass tomography and 46 ± 9% by electron beam tomography. The linear correlation coefficient between both methods was 0.82 (p <0.0001), with slope = 1.0, y-intercept = -1.1, and SEE = 6.1. The mean difference between the 2 methods was -0.7 ± 6.0 EF units (p = 0.75). The correlation between the differences and means of both methods was 0.34 (p = 0.04), indicating a trend for first-pass angiography to overestimate LVEF in the higher range. LVEFs measured by first-pass angiography in patients with abnormal LV geometry and contraction patterns caused by anterior wall AMI agree well with those measured by electron beam tomography in the clinically relevant range.

AB - The goal of this study was to compare measurements of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by first-pass radionuclide angiography ('first- pass angiography') using technetium-99m (Tc-99m) sestamibi with those by contrast-enhanced electron beam computed tomography ('electron beam tomography') as a reference technique in patients with an anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Twenty-five patients with first Q-wave anterior wall AMI underwent paired electron beam tomographic and first-pass angiographic studies (mean, 1 day apart). Fourteen patients had 2 sets of measurements of the LVEF obtained by both methods (separated by at least 6 weeks), for a total of 39 paired measurements. LVEF by electron beam tomography was calculated from absolute systolic and diastolic LV chamber volumes. LV volumes by electron beam tomography were 199 ± 51 ml at end- diastole and 111 ± 42 ml at end-systole. Mean LVEF was 45 ± 11% by first- pass tomography and 46 ± 9% by electron beam tomography. The linear correlation coefficient between both methods was 0.82 (p <0.0001), with slope = 1.0, y-intercept = -1.1, and SEE = 6.1. The mean difference between the 2 methods was -0.7 ± 6.0 EF units (p = 0.75). The correlation between the differences and means of both methods was 0.34 (p = 0.04), indicating a trend for first-pass angiography to overestimate LVEF in the higher range. LVEFs measured by first-pass angiography in patients with abnormal LV geometry and contraction patterns caused by anterior wall AMI agree well with those measured by electron beam tomography in the clinically relevant range.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032907878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032907878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00008-9

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00008-9

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 1022

EP - 1026

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 7

ER -