Comparison of isokinetic hip abduction and adduction peak torques and ratio between sexes

Dai Sugimoto, Carl G. Mattacola, David R. Mullineaux, Thomas G. Palmer, Timothy Hewett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate hip abductor and adductor peak torque outputs and compare their ratios between sexes. DESIGN:: A cross-sectional laboratory-controlled study. SETTING:: Participants visited a laboratory and performed an isokinetic hip abductor and adductor test. All participants performed 2 sets of 5 repetitions of concentric hip abduction and adduction in a standing position at 60 degrees per second. Gravity was determined as a function of joint angle relative to the horizontal plane and was corrected by normalizing the weight of the limb on an individual basis. PARTICIPANTS:: A total of 36 collegiate athletes. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES:: Sex (20 females and 16 males). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Bilateral peak hip abductor and adductor torques were measured. The 3 highest peak torque values were averaged for each subject. RESULTS:: Independent t tests were used to compare sex differences in hip abductor and adductor peak torques and the abductor:adductor peak torque ratios. Males demonstrated significantly greater hip abductor peak torque compared with females (males 1.29 ± 0.24 Nm/kg, females 1.13 ± 0.20 Nm/kg; P = 0.03). Neither hip adductor peak torque nor their ratios differed between sexes. CONCLUSIONS:: Sex differences in hip abductor strength were observed. The role of weaker hip abductors in females deserves further attention and may be a factor for higher risk of knee pathologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)422-428
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sex Ratio
Torque
Hip
Sex Characteristics
Gravitation
Posture
Athletes
Knee
Extremities
Joints
Pathology
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • body position
  • correction
  • gravity
  • strength training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of isokinetic hip abduction and adduction peak torques and ratio between sexes. / Sugimoto, Dai; Mattacola, Carl G.; Mullineaux, David R.; Palmer, Thomas G.; Hewett, Timothy.

In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2014, p. 422-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sugimoto, Dai ; Mattacola, Carl G. ; Mullineaux, David R. ; Palmer, Thomas G. ; Hewett, Timothy. / Comparison of isokinetic hip abduction and adduction peak torques and ratio between sexes. In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 422-428.
@article{24f02b996fa945799ad1749dbd444133,
title = "Comparison of isokinetic hip abduction and adduction peak torques and ratio between sexes",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate hip abductor and adductor peak torque outputs and compare their ratios between sexes. DESIGN:: A cross-sectional laboratory-controlled study. SETTING:: Participants visited a laboratory and performed an isokinetic hip abductor and adductor test. All participants performed 2 sets of 5 repetitions of concentric hip abduction and adduction in a standing position at 60 degrees per second. Gravity was determined as a function of joint angle relative to the horizontal plane and was corrected by normalizing the weight of the limb on an individual basis. PARTICIPANTS:: A total of 36 collegiate athletes. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES:: Sex (20 females and 16 males). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Bilateral peak hip abductor and adductor torques were measured. The 3 highest peak torque values were averaged for each subject. RESULTS:: Independent t tests were used to compare sex differences in hip abductor and adductor peak torques and the abductor:adductor peak torque ratios. Males demonstrated significantly greater hip abductor peak torque compared with females (males 1.29 ± 0.24 Nm/kg, females 1.13 ± 0.20 Nm/kg; P = 0.03). Neither hip adductor peak torque nor their ratios differed between sexes. CONCLUSIONS:: Sex differences in hip abductor strength were observed. The role of weaker hip abductors in females deserves further attention and may be a factor for higher risk of knee pathologies.",
keywords = "body position, correction, gravity, strength training",
author = "Dai Sugimoto and Mattacola, {Carl G.} and Mullineaux, {David R.} and Palmer, {Thomas G.} and Timothy Hewett",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/JSM.0000000000000059",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "422--428",
journal = "Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine",
issn = "1050-642X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of isokinetic hip abduction and adduction peak torques and ratio between sexes

AU - Sugimoto, Dai

AU - Mattacola, Carl G.

AU - Mullineaux, David R.

AU - Palmer, Thomas G.

AU - Hewett, Timothy

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate hip abductor and adductor peak torque outputs and compare their ratios between sexes. DESIGN:: A cross-sectional laboratory-controlled study. SETTING:: Participants visited a laboratory and performed an isokinetic hip abductor and adductor test. All participants performed 2 sets of 5 repetitions of concentric hip abduction and adduction in a standing position at 60 degrees per second. Gravity was determined as a function of joint angle relative to the horizontal plane and was corrected by normalizing the weight of the limb on an individual basis. PARTICIPANTS:: A total of 36 collegiate athletes. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES:: Sex (20 females and 16 males). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Bilateral peak hip abductor and adductor torques were measured. The 3 highest peak torque values were averaged for each subject. RESULTS:: Independent t tests were used to compare sex differences in hip abductor and adductor peak torques and the abductor:adductor peak torque ratios. Males demonstrated significantly greater hip abductor peak torque compared with females (males 1.29 ± 0.24 Nm/kg, females 1.13 ± 0.20 Nm/kg; P = 0.03). Neither hip adductor peak torque nor their ratios differed between sexes. CONCLUSIONS:: Sex differences in hip abductor strength were observed. The role of weaker hip abductors in females deserves further attention and may be a factor for higher risk of knee pathologies.

AB - OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate hip abductor and adductor peak torque outputs and compare their ratios between sexes. DESIGN:: A cross-sectional laboratory-controlled study. SETTING:: Participants visited a laboratory and performed an isokinetic hip abductor and adductor test. All participants performed 2 sets of 5 repetitions of concentric hip abduction and adduction in a standing position at 60 degrees per second. Gravity was determined as a function of joint angle relative to the horizontal plane and was corrected by normalizing the weight of the limb on an individual basis. PARTICIPANTS:: A total of 36 collegiate athletes. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES:: Sex (20 females and 16 males). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Bilateral peak hip abductor and adductor torques were measured. The 3 highest peak torque values were averaged for each subject. RESULTS:: Independent t tests were used to compare sex differences in hip abductor and adductor peak torques and the abductor:adductor peak torque ratios. Males demonstrated significantly greater hip abductor peak torque compared with females (males 1.29 ± 0.24 Nm/kg, females 1.13 ± 0.20 Nm/kg; P = 0.03). Neither hip adductor peak torque nor their ratios differed between sexes. CONCLUSIONS:: Sex differences in hip abductor strength were observed. The role of weaker hip abductors in females deserves further attention and may be a factor for higher risk of knee pathologies.

KW - body position

KW - correction

KW - gravity

KW - strength training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906939660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906939660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000059

DO - 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000059

M3 - Article

C2 - 24905541

AN - SCOPUS:84906939660

VL - 24

SP - 422

EP - 428

JO - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

JF - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

SN - 1050-642X

IS - 5

ER -