Comparison of full-thickness skin grafts versus second-intention healing for mohs defects of the helix

Phillip C. Hochwalt, Kevin N. Christensen, Sean R. Cantwell, Thomas L. Hocker, Jerry D. Brewer, Christian Baum, Christopher J. Arpey, Clark C. Otley, Randall K. Roenigk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Two repair options for Mohs defects of the helix include full-thickness skin grafting and second-intention healing. Limited long-term data exist comparing these 2 repair options. Objective: To compare outcomes of full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) versus second-intention wound healing for Mohs defects on the helix. METHODS: In this study, 29 second-intention and 18 FTSG repairs were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Patient questionnaires and retrospective chart analysis were used to assess secondary outcomes. Results: The average second-intention VAS score was 82.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 7.6), and the average FTSG VAS score was 75.2 (SD = 16.7) (difference of 6.9, 95% confidence interval:-1.3 to 15.1, p =.061). A subsequent noninferiority test indicated that cosmetic outcome of second-intention healing was at least as good as that of FTSG in the authors' study (p <.001). Retrospective chart analysis revealed no significant difference in complications. Patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusion: Mohs surgical defects of the helix left to heal by second-intention have comparable long-term cosmetic outcomes to those repaired by FTSG. There was no significant difference in complications, and patients were highly satisfied with both repair options.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-77
Number of pages9
JournalDermatologic Surgery
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 13 2015

Fingerprint

Transplants
Skin
Visual Analog Scale
Cosmetics
Skin Transplantation
Wound Healing
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Hochwalt, P. C., Christensen, K. N., Cantwell, S. R., Hocker, T. L., Brewer, J. D., Baum, C., ... Roenigk, R. K. (2015). Comparison of full-thickness skin grafts versus second-intention healing for mohs defects of the helix. Dermatologic Surgery, 41(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000208

Comparison of full-thickness skin grafts versus second-intention healing for mohs defects of the helix. / Hochwalt, Phillip C.; Christensen, Kevin N.; Cantwell, Sean R.; Hocker, Thomas L.; Brewer, Jerry D.; Baum, Christian; Arpey, Christopher J.; Otley, Clark C.; Roenigk, Randall K.

In: Dermatologic Surgery, Vol. 41, No. 1, 13.01.2015, p. 69-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hochwalt, PC, Christensen, KN, Cantwell, SR, Hocker, TL, Brewer, JD, Baum, C, Arpey, CJ, Otley, CC & Roenigk, RK 2015, 'Comparison of full-thickness skin grafts versus second-intention healing for mohs defects of the helix', Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000208
Hochwalt, Phillip C. ; Christensen, Kevin N. ; Cantwell, Sean R. ; Hocker, Thomas L. ; Brewer, Jerry D. ; Baum, Christian ; Arpey, Christopher J. ; Otley, Clark C. ; Roenigk, Randall K. / Comparison of full-thickness skin grafts versus second-intention healing for mohs defects of the helix. In: Dermatologic Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 69-77.
@article{dd4a1e322a0e4fa8a4c2fc64b1ba8eb0,
title = "Comparison of full-thickness skin grafts versus second-intention healing for mohs defects of the helix",
abstract = "Background: Two repair options for Mohs defects of the helix include full-thickness skin grafting and second-intention healing. Limited long-term data exist comparing these 2 repair options. Objective: To compare outcomes of full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) versus second-intention wound healing for Mohs defects on the helix. METHODS: In this study, 29 second-intention and 18 FTSG repairs were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Patient questionnaires and retrospective chart analysis were used to assess secondary outcomes. Results: The average second-intention VAS score was 82.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 7.6), and the average FTSG VAS score was 75.2 (SD = 16.7) (difference of 6.9, 95{\%} confidence interval:-1.3 to 15.1, p =.061). A subsequent noninferiority test indicated that cosmetic outcome of second-intention healing was at least as good as that of FTSG in the authors' study (p <.001). Retrospective chart analysis revealed no significant difference in complications. Patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusion: Mohs surgical defects of the helix left to heal by second-intention have comparable long-term cosmetic outcomes to those repaired by FTSG. There was no significant difference in complications, and patients were highly satisfied with both repair options.",
author = "Hochwalt, {Phillip C.} and Christensen, {Kevin N.} and Cantwell, {Sean R.} and Hocker, {Thomas L.} and Brewer, {Jerry D.} and Christian Baum and Arpey, {Christopher J.} and Otley, {Clark C.} and Roenigk, {Randall K.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1097/DSS.0000000000000208",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "69--77",
journal = "Dermatologic Surgery",
issn = "1076-0512",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of full-thickness skin grafts versus second-intention healing for mohs defects of the helix

AU - Hochwalt, Phillip C.

AU - Christensen, Kevin N.

AU - Cantwell, Sean R.

AU - Hocker, Thomas L.

AU - Brewer, Jerry D.

AU - Baum, Christian

AU - Arpey, Christopher J.

AU - Otley, Clark C.

AU - Roenigk, Randall K.

PY - 2015/1/13

Y1 - 2015/1/13

N2 - Background: Two repair options for Mohs defects of the helix include full-thickness skin grafting and second-intention healing. Limited long-term data exist comparing these 2 repair options. Objective: To compare outcomes of full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) versus second-intention wound healing for Mohs defects on the helix. METHODS: In this study, 29 second-intention and 18 FTSG repairs were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Patient questionnaires and retrospective chart analysis were used to assess secondary outcomes. Results: The average second-intention VAS score was 82.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 7.6), and the average FTSG VAS score was 75.2 (SD = 16.7) (difference of 6.9, 95% confidence interval:-1.3 to 15.1, p =.061). A subsequent noninferiority test indicated that cosmetic outcome of second-intention healing was at least as good as that of FTSG in the authors' study (p <.001). Retrospective chart analysis revealed no significant difference in complications. Patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusion: Mohs surgical defects of the helix left to heal by second-intention have comparable long-term cosmetic outcomes to those repaired by FTSG. There was no significant difference in complications, and patients were highly satisfied with both repair options.

AB - Background: Two repair options for Mohs defects of the helix include full-thickness skin grafting and second-intention healing. Limited long-term data exist comparing these 2 repair options. Objective: To compare outcomes of full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) versus second-intention wound healing for Mohs defects on the helix. METHODS: In this study, 29 second-intention and 18 FTSG repairs were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Patient questionnaires and retrospective chart analysis were used to assess secondary outcomes. Results: The average second-intention VAS score was 82.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 7.6), and the average FTSG VAS score was 75.2 (SD = 16.7) (difference of 6.9, 95% confidence interval:-1.3 to 15.1, p =.061). A subsequent noninferiority test indicated that cosmetic outcome of second-intention healing was at least as good as that of FTSG in the authors' study (p <.001). Retrospective chart analysis revealed no significant difference in complications. Patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusion: Mohs surgical defects of the helix left to heal by second-intention have comparable long-term cosmetic outcomes to those repaired by FTSG. There was no significant difference in complications, and patients were highly satisfied with both repair options.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920830036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920830036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000208

DO - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000208

M3 - Article

C2 - 25545178

AN - SCOPUS:84920830036

VL - 41

SP - 69

EP - 77

JO - Dermatologic Surgery

JF - Dermatologic Surgery

SN - 1076-0512

IS - 1

ER -