Comparison of EMG power during sleep from the submental and frontalis muscles

Daniel J. Levendowski, Erik K St Louis, Luigi Ferini Strambi, Andrea Galbiati, Philip Westbrook, Chris Berka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Submentalis electromyography (sEMG) and frontalis electromyography (fEMG) muscle activities have been used to assist in the staging of sleep and detection of disruptions in sleep. This study was designed to assess the concordance between sEMG and fEMG power, by and across sleep stages. Methods: Forty-three records with simultaneous acquisition of differential signals from the submental and frontalis muscles were evaluated. Sleep stages were assigned using the polysomnography signals based on majority agreement of five technicians. The sEMG and fEMG signals were identically filtered and aligned prior to cross-correlation analysis. Results: A strong concordance between sEMG and fEMG power was observed, with 95% of the records exhibiting at least moderate agreement. During rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, sEMG power was significantly less than fEMG power, but exhibited four times greater across-subject variability. fEMG power during wake and non-REM (NREM) sleep was greater than sEMG power, but with 50% less variability. Differences in wake and N1 mean power and between the other sleep stages were more distinct in the fEMG recordings. Relative changes in sEMG and fEMG power across wake, NREM, and REM stages were essentially identical with median by-subject cross correlations of 0.98 and interquartile ranges of 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. Conclusion: The fEMG and sEMG power values were similar during wakefulness and sleep; however, the frontalis exhibits substantially less between-subject variability. This study established face validity for the use of fEMG in the detection of wake and stages of sleep, and for future applications toward assessment of quantitative REM sleep muscle activity in REM sleep behavior disorder.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)431-437
Number of pages7
JournalNature and Science of Sleep
Volume10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electromyography
Sleep
Muscles
Sleep Stages
REM Sleep
Power (Psychology)
REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
Polysomnography
Wakefulness
Eye Movements
Reproducibility of Results

Keywords

  • EMG
  • Frontalis
  • REM sleep without atonia
  • Sleep stage
  • Submentalis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Comparison of EMG power during sleep from the submental and frontalis muscles. / Levendowski, Daniel J.; St Louis, Erik K; Strambi, Luigi Ferini; Galbiati, Andrea; Westbrook, Philip; Berka, Chris.

In: Nature and Science of Sleep, Vol. 10, 01.01.2018, p. 431-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Levendowski, Daniel J. ; St Louis, Erik K ; Strambi, Luigi Ferini ; Galbiati, Andrea ; Westbrook, Philip ; Berka, Chris. / Comparison of EMG power during sleep from the submental and frontalis muscles. In: Nature and Science of Sleep. 2018 ; Vol. 10. pp. 431-437.
@article{db18a61ecccc46208ac0b25047bd6171,
title = "Comparison of EMG power during sleep from the submental and frontalis muscles",
abstract = "Objective: Submentalis electromyography (sEMG) and frontalis electromyography (fEMG) muscle activities have been used to assist in the staging of sleep and detection of disruptions in sleep. This study was designed to assess the concordance between sEMG and fEMG power, by and across sleep stages. Methods: Forty-three records with simultaneous acquisition of differential signals from the submental and frontalis muscles were evaluated. Sleep stages were assigned using the polysomnography signals based on majority agreement of five technicians. The sEMG and fEMG signals were identically filtered and aligned prior to cross-correlation analysis. Results: A strong concordance between sEMG and fEMG power was observed, with 95{\%} of the records exhibiting at least moderate agreement. During rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, sEMG power was significantly less than fEMG power, but exhibited four times greater across-subject variability. fEMG power during wake and non-REM (NREM) sleep was greater than sEMG power, but with 50{\%} less variability. Differences in wake and N1 mean power and between the other sleep stages were more distinct in the fEMG recordings. Relative changes in sEMG and fEMG power across wake, NREM, and REM stages were essentially identical with median by-subject cross correlations of 0.98 and interquartile ranges of 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. Conclusion: The fEMG and sEMG power values were similar during wakefulness and sleep; however, the frontalis exhibits substantially less between-subject variability. This study established face validity for the use of fEMG in the detection of wake and stages of sleep, and for future applications toward assessment of quantitative REM sleep muscle activity in REM sleep behavior disorder.",
keywords = "EMG, Frontalis, REM sleep without atonia, Sleep stage, Submentalis",
author = "Levendowski, {Daniel J.} and {St Louis}, {Erik K} and Strambi, {Luigi Ferini} and Andrea Galbiati and Philip Westbrook and Chris Berka",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2147/NSS.S189167",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "431--437",
journal = "Nature and Science of Sleep",
issn = "1179-1608",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of EMG power during sleep from the submental and frontalis muscles

AU - Levendowski, Daniel J.

AU - St Louis, Erik K

AU - Strambi, Luigi Ferini

AU - Galbiati, Andrea

AU - Westbrook, Philip

AU - Berka, Chris

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: Submentalis electromyography (sEMG) and frontalis electromyography (fEMG) muscle activities have been used to assist in the staging of sleep and detection of disruptions in sleep. This study was designed to assess the concordance between sEMG and fEMG power, by and across sleep stages. Methods: Forty-three records with simultaneous acquisition of differential signals from the submental and frontalis muscles were evaluated. Sleep stages were assigned using the polysomnography signals based on majority agreement of five technicians. The sEMG and fEMG signals were identically filtered and aligned prior to cross-correlation analysis. Results: A strong concordance between sEMG and fEMG power was observed, with 95% of the records exhibiting at least moderate agreement. During rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, sEMG power was significantly less than fEMG power, but exhibited four times greater across-subject variability. fEMG power during wake and non-REM (NREM) sleep was greater than sEMG power, but with 50% less variability. Differences in wake and N1 mean power and between the other sleep stages were more distinct in the fEMG recordings. Relative changes in sEMG and fEMG power across wake, NREM, and REM stages were essentially identical with median by-subject cross correlations of 0.98 and interquartile ranges of 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. Conclusion: The fEMG and sEMG power values were similar during wakefulness and sleep; however, the frontalis exhibits substantially less between-subject variability. This study established face validity for the use of fEMG in the detection of wake and stages of sleep, and for future applications toward assessment of quantitative REM sleep muscle activity in REM sleep behavior disorder.

AB - Objective: Submentalis electromyography (sEMG) and frontalis electromyography (fEMG) muscle activities have been used to assist in the staging of sleep and detection of disruptions in sleep. This study was designed to assess the concordance between sEMG and fEMG power, by and across sleep stages. Methods: Forty-three records with simultaneous acquisition of differential signals from the submental and frontalis muscles were evaluated. Sleep stages were assigned using the polysomnography signals based on majority agreement of five technicians. The sEMG and fEMG signals were identically filtered and aligned prior to cross-correlation analysis. Results: A strong concordance between sEMG and fEMG power was observed, with 95% of the records exhibiting at least moderate agreement. During rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, sEMG power was significantly less than fEMG power, but exhibited four times greater across-subject variability. fEMG power during wake and non-REM (NREM) sleep was greater than sEMG power, but with 50% less variability. Differences in wake and N1 mean power and between the other sleep stages were more distinct in the fEMG recordings. Relative changes in sEMG and fEMG power across wake, NREM, and REM stages were essentially identical with median by-subject cross correlations of 0.98 and interquartile ranges of 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. Conclusion: The fEMG and sEMG power values were similar during wakefulness and sleep; however, the frontalis exhibits substantially less between-subject variability. This study established face validity for the use of fEMG in the detection of wake and stages of sleep, and for future applications toward assessment of quantitative REM sleep muscle activity in REM sleep behavior disorder.

KW - EMG

KW - Frontalis

KW - REM sleep without atonia

KW - Sleep stage

KW - Submentalis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064752515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064752515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/NSS.S189167

DO - 10.2147/NSS.S189167

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064752515

VL - 10

SP - 431

EP - 437

JO - Nature and Science of Sleep

JF - Nature and Science of Sleep

SN - 1179-1608

ER -