Comparison of directly stimulated with axon‐reflex–mediated sudomotor responses in human subjects and in patients with diabetes

Mikihiro Kihara, Tonette L. Opfer‐Gehrking, Phillip A. Low

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Scopus citations

Abstract

The muscarinic receptors of human eccrine sweat gland may be directly stimulated by iontophoresis of acetylcholine (direct response; DIR) and indirectly via nicotinic receptors and an axon “reflex” (AXR). Using a specially designed multicompartmental sweat cell and dual sudorometers, we were able to simultaneously record the evoked DIR and AXR responses. On a second day, we repeated the experiment under identical ambient and stimulus conditions but instead obtained silastic imprints of DIR and AXR for morphometry. Studies were done on 24 controls (mean SD = 47.6 ± 15.1 years) and 23 diabetic subjects (mean ± SD = 49.6 ± 16.3 years). In control subjects, sudorometric DIR recordings were consistently larger than AXR. There was no difference in sweat droplet density by sex, but the size of droplets was larger in males. In diabetic patients 3 of 23 had absent AXR but preserved DIR, suggesting that failure of AXR preceded DIR in patients with neuropathy. Patients with mild neuropathy had an overrepresentation of large diameter droplets in the silastic imprints of both DIR and AXR, while patients with severe neuropathy had a markedly reduced density and small diameter droplets. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)655-660
Number of pages6
JournalMuscle & Nerve
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1993

Keywords

  • axon refelex
  • diabetes
  • neuropathy
  • sudomotor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of directly stimulated with axon‐reflex–mediated sudomotor responses in human subjects and in patients with diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this