Comparison of computer-based clinical decision support systems and content for diabetes mellitus

M. Kantor, A. Wright, M. Burton, G. Fraser, M. Krall, S. Maviglia, N. Mohammed-Rajput, L. Simonaitis, F. Sonnenberg, B. Middleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Computer-based clinical decision support (CDS) systems have been shown to improve quality of care and workflow efficiency, and health care reform legislation relies on electronic health records and CDS systems to improve the cost and quality of health care in the United States; however, the heterogeneity of CDS content and infrastructure of CDS systems across sites is not well known. Objective: We aimed to determine the scope of CDS content in diabetes care at six sites, assess the capabilities of CDS in use at these sites, characterize the scope of CDS infrastructure at these sites, and determine how the sites use CDS beyond individual patient care in order to identify characteristics of CDS systems and content that have been successfully implemented in diabetes care. Methods: We compared CDS systems in six collaborating sites of the Clinical Decision Support Consortium. We gathered CDS content on care for patients with diabetes mellitus and surveyed institutions on characteristics of their site, the infrastructure of CDS at these sites, and the capabilities of CDS at these sites. Results: The approach to CDS and the characteristics of CDS content varied among sites. Some commonalities included providing customizability by role or user, applying sophisticated exclusion criteria, and using CDS automatically at the time of decision-making. Many messages were actionable recommendations. Most sites had monitoring rules (e.g. assessing hemoglobin A1c), but few had rules to diagnose diabetes or suggest specific treatments. All sites had numerous prevention rules including reminders for providing eye examinations, influenza vaccines, lipid screenings, nephropathy screenings, and pneumococcal vaccines. Conclusion: Computer-based CDS systems vary widely across sites in content and scope, but both institution-created and purchased systems had many similar features and functionality, such as integration of alerts and reminders into the decision-making workflow of the provider and providing messages that are actionable recommendations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)284-303
Number of pages20
JournalApplied Clinical Informatics
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Clinical Decision Support Systems
Medical problems
Decision support systems
Diabetes Mellitus
Vaccines
Health care
Screening
Decision making
Hemoglobin
Lipids
Workflow
Quality of Health Care
Health
Monitoring
Decision Making
Patient Care

Keywords

  • Clinical care
  • Clinical decision support
  • Clinical decision support systems
  • Computer assisted decision making
  • Computerized medical record system
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Disease management
  • Hospital information system
  • Medicine clinical information system
  • Specific conditions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Kantor, M., Wright, A., Burton, M., Fraser, G., Krall, M., Maviglia, S., ... Middleton, B. (2011). Comparison of computer-based clinical decision support systems and content for diabetes mellitus. Applied Clinical Informatics, 2(3), 284-303. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2011-02-RA-0012

Comparison of computer-based clinical decision support systems and content for diabetes mellitus. / Kantor, M.; Wright, A.; Burton, M.; Fraser, G.; Krall, M.; Maviglia, S.; Mohammed-Rajput, N.; Simonaitis, L.; Sonnenberg, F.; Middleton, B.

In: Applied Clinical Informatics, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2011, p. 284-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kantor, M, Wright, A, Burton, M, Fraser, G, Krall, M, Maviglia, S, Mohammed-Rajput, N, Simonaitis, L, Sonnenberg, F & Middleton, B 2011, 'Comparison of computer-based clinical decision support systems and content for diabetes mellitus', Applied Clinical Informatics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 284-303. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2011-02-RA-0012
Kantor, M. ; Wright, A. ; Burton, M. ; Fraser, G. ; Krall, M. ; Maviglia, S. ; Mohammed-Rajput, N. ; Simonaitis, L. ; Sonnenberg, F. ; Middleton, B. / Comparison of computer-based clinical decision support systems and content for diabetes mellitus. In: Applied Clinical Informatics. 2011 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 284-303.
@article{feaba363aaee401b83767b3de1ef6eb3,
title = "Comparison of computer-based clinical decision support systems and content for diabetes mellitus",
abstract = "Background: Computer-based clinical decision support (CDS) systems have been shown to improve quality of care and workflow efficiency, and health care reform legislation relies on electronic health records and CDS systems to improve the cost and quality of health care in the United States; however, the heterogeneity of CDS content and infrastructure of CDS systems across sites is not well known. Objective: We aimed to determine the scope of CDS content in diabetes care at six sites, assess the capabilities of CDS in use at these sites, characterize the scope of CDS infrastructure at these sites, and determine how the sites use CDS beyond individual patient care in order to identify characteristics of CDS systems and content that have been successfully implemented in diabetes care. Methods: We compared CDS systems in six collaborating sites of the Clinical Decision Support Consortium. We gathered CDS content on care for patients with diabetes mellitus and surveyed institutions on characteristics of their site, the infrastructure of CDS at these sites, and the capabilities of CDS at these sites. Results: The approach to CDS and the characteristics of CDS content varied among sites. Some commonalities included providing customizability by role or user, applying sophisticated exclusion criteria, and using CDS automatically at the time of decision-making. Many messages were actionable recommendations. Most sites had monitoring rules (e.g. assessing hemoglobin A1c), but few had rules to diagnose diabetes or suggest specific treatments. All sites had numerous prevention rules including reminders for providing eye examinations, influenza vaccines, lipid screenings, nephropathy screenings, and pneumococcal vaccines. Conclusion: Computer-based CDS systems vary widely across sites in content and scope, but both institution-created and purchased systems had many similar features and functionality, such as integration of alerts and reminders into the decision-making workflow of the provider and providing messages that are actionable recommendations.",
keywords = "Clinical care, Clinical decision support, Clinical decision support systems, Computer assisted decision making, Computerized medical record system, Diabetes mellitus, Disease management, Hospital information system, Medicine clinical information system, Specific conditions",
author = "M. Kantor and A. Wright and M. Burton and G. Fraser and M. Krall and S. Maviglia and N. Mohammed-Rajput and L. Simonaitis and F. Sonnenberg and B. Middleton",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.4338/ACI-2011-02-RA-0012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "284--303",
journal = "Applied Clinical Informatics",
issn = "1869-0327",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of computer-based clinical decision support systems and content for diabetes mellitus

AU - Kantor, M.

AU - Wright, A.

AU - Burton, M.

AU - Fraser, G.

AU - Krall, M.

AU - Maviglia, S.

AU - Mohammed-Rajput, N.

AU - Simonaitis, L.

AU - Sonnenberg, F.

AU - Middleton, B.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: Computer-based clinical decision support (CDS) systems have been shown to improve quality of care and workflow efficiency, and health care reform legislation relies on electronic health records and CDS systems to improve the cost and quality of health care in the United States; however, the heterogeneity of CDS content and infrastructure of CDS systems across sites is not well known. Objective: We aimed to determine the scope of CDS content in diabetes care at six sites, assess the capabilities of CDS in use at these sites, characterize the scope of CDS infrastructure at these sites, and determine how the sites use CDS beyond individual patient care in order to identify characteristics of CDS systems and content that have been successfully implemented in diabetes care. Methods: We compared CDS systems in six collaborating sites of the Clinical Decision Support Consortium. We gathered CDS content on care for patients with diabetes mellitus and surveyed institutions on characteristics of their site, the infrastructure of CDS at these sites, and the capabilities of CDS at these sites. Results: The approach to CDS and the characteristics of CDS content varied among sites. Some commonalities included providing customizability by role or user, applying sophisticated exclusion criteria, and using CDS automatically at the time of decision-making. Many messages were actionable recommendations. Most sites had monitoring rules (e.g. assessing hemoglobin A1c), but few had rules to diagnose diabetes or suggest specific treatments. All sites had numerous prevention rules including reminders for providing eye examinations, influenza vaccines, lipid screenings, nephropathy screenings, and pneumococcal vaccines. Conclusion: Computer-based CDS systems vary widely across sites in content and scope, but both institution-created and purchased systems had many similar features and functionality, such as integration of alerts and reminders into the decision-making workflow of the provider and providing messages that are actionable recommendations.

AB - Background: Computer-based clinical decision support (CDS) systems have been shown to improve quality of care and workflow efficiency, and health care reform legislation relies on electronic health records and CDS systems to improve the cost and quality of health care in the United States; however, the heterogeneity of CDS content and infrastructure of CDS systems across sites is not well known. Objective: We aimed to determine the scope of CDS content in diabetes care at six sites, assess the capabilities of CDS in use at these sites, characterize the scope of CDS infrastructure at these sites, and determine how the sites use CDS beyond individual patient care in order to identify characteristics of CDS systems and content that have been successfully implemented in diabetes care. Methods: We compared CDS systems in six collaborating sites of the Clinical Decision Support Consortium. We gathered CDS content on care for patients with diabetes mellitus and surveyed institutions on characteristics of their site, the infrastructure of CDS at these sites, and the capabilities of CDS at these sites. Results: The approach to CDS and the characteristics of CDS content varied among sites. Some commonalities included providing customizability by role or user, applying sophisticated exclusion criteria, and using CDS automatically at the time of decision-making. Many messages were actionable recommendations. Most sites had monitoring rules (e.g. assessing hemoglobin A1c), but few had rules to diagnose diabetes or suggest specific treatments. All sites had numerous prevention rules including reminders for providing eye examinations, influenza vaccines, lipid screenings, nephropathy screenings, and pneumococcal vaccines. Conclusion: Computer-based CDS systems vary widely across sites in content and scope, but both institution-created and purchased systems had many similar features and functionality, such as integration of alerts and reminders into the decision-making workflow of the provider and providing messages that are actionable recommendations.

KW - Clinical care

KW - Clinical decision support

KW - Clinical decision support systems

KW - Computer assisted decision making

KW - Computerized medical record system

KW - Diabetes mellitus

KW - Disease management

KW - Hospital information system

KW - Medicine clinical information system

KW - Specific conditions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884492490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884492490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4338/ACI-2011-02-RA-0012

DO - 10.4338/ACI-2011-02-RA-0012

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 284

EP - 303

JO - Applied Clinical Informatics

JF - Applied Clinical Informatics

SN - 1869-0327

IS - 3

ER -