TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of community and referral intensive care unit patients in a tertiary medical center
T2 - Evidence for referral bias in the critically ill
AU - Seferian, Edward G.
AU - Afessa, Bekele
AU - Gajic, Ognjen
AU - Keegan, Mark T.
AU - Hubmayr, Rolf D.
PY - 2008/1/1
Y1 - 2008/1/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine the existence of referral bias in the critically ill by comparing the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of community (Olmsted County, MN residents) and referral (non-Olmsted County residents) patients admitted to the intensive care unit. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the medical and surgical intensive care units at Mayo Medical Center from 1995 to 2004. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Residency status, demographics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, intensive care unit admission diagnosis and treatment status, intensive care unit and hospital mortality, length of stay, and travel distances to Mayo Clinic. Referral patients with a medical intensive care unit admission were more severely ill, had greater mortality rates and length of stay and were more likely to receive an active intensive care unit intervention compared with community patients (p < 0.0001). Referral and community patients who had a surgical intensive care unit admission had similar severity of illness, length of stay, and intensive care unit mortality rate. Hospital mortality rate was lower in the referral surgical patients compared with community surgical patients (p ≤ 0.0001). When adjusted for severity of illness, intensity of treatment, and admission source, community and referral medical intensive care unit patients had a similar risk of hospital death, whereas referral surgical patients had a lower risk of hospital death compared with community patients. Referral patients who had a medical intensive care unit admission and traveled greater distances to Mayo Clinic had greater mortality rates and length of stay; those who had a surgical intensive care unit admission and traveled greater distances had lower mortalities and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who resided outside of our local community and who had medical admissions to the intensive care unit were more severely ill, had greater mortality rates, and had longer length of stay compared with community patients. Our findings support the existence of referral bias in critically ill medical patients at our tertiary medical center.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine the existence of referral bias in the critically ill by comparing the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of community (Olmsted County, MN residents) and referral (non-Olmsted County residents) patients admitted to the intensive care unit. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the medical and surgical intensive care units at Mayo Medical Center from 1995 to 2004. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Residency status, demographics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, intensive care unit admission diagnosis and treatment status, intensive care unit and hospital mortality, length of stay, and travel distances to Mayo Clinic. Referral patients with a medical intensive care unit admission were more severely ill, had greater mortality rates and length of stay and were more likely to receive an active intensive care unit intervention compared with community patients (p < 0.0001). Referral and community patients who had a surgical intensive care unit admission had similar severity of illness, length of stay, and intensive care unit mortality rate. Hospital mortality rate was lower in the referral surgical patients compared with community surgical patients (p ≤ 0.0001). When adjusted for severity of illness, intensity of treatment, and admission source, community and referral medical intensive care unit patients had a similar risk of hospital death, whereas referral surgical patients had a lower risk of hospital death compared with community patients. Referral patients who had a medical intensive care unit admission and traveled greater distances to Mayo Clinic had greater mortality rates and length of stay; those who had a surgical intensive care unit admission and traveled greater distances had lower mortalities and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who resided outside of our local community and who had medical admissions to the intensive care unit were more severely ill, had greater mortality rates, and had longer length of stay compared with community patients. Our findings support the existence of referral bias in critically ill medical patients at our tertiary medical center.
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Intensive care units
KW - Outcomes research
KW - Selection bias
KW - Severity of illness index
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54549105583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54549105583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186ab1b
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186ab1b
M3 - Article
C2 - 18828201
AN - SCOPUS:54549105583
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 36
SP - 2779
EP - 2786
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 10
ER -