Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies

Emily Vogtmann, Jun Chen, Amnon Amir, Jianxin Shi, Christian C. Abnet, Heidi Nelson, Rob Knight, Nicholas D Chia, Rashmi Sinha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prospective cohort studies are needed to assess the relationship between the fecal microbiome and human health and disease. To evaluate fecal collection methods, we determined technical reproducibility, stability at ambient temperature, and accuracy of 5 fecal collection methods (no additive, 95% ethanol, RNAlater Stabilization Solution, fecal occult blood test cards, and fecal immunochemical test tubes). Fifty-two healthy volunteers provided fecal samples at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, in 2014. One set from each sample collection method was frozen immediately, and a second set was incubated at room temperature for 96 hours and then frozen. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the relative abundance of 3 phyla, 2 alpha diversity metrics, and 4 beta diversity metrics. Technical reproducibility was high, with ICCs for duplicate fecal samples between 0.64 and 1.00. Stability for most methods was generally high, although the ICCs were below 0.60 for 95% ethanol in metrics that were more sensitive to relative abundance. When compared with fecal samples that were frozen immediately, the ICCs were below 0.60 for the metrics that were sensitive to relative abundance; however, the remaining 2 alpha diversity and 3 beta diversitymetrics were all relatively accurate, with ICCs above 0.60. In conclusion, all fecal sample collection methods appear relatively reproducible, stable, and accurate. Future studies could use these collection methods for microbiome analyses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-123
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume185
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Microbiota
Ethanol
Occult Blood
Temperature
Hematologic Tests
Healthy Volunteers
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Health

Keywords

  • Feces
  • Microbiota
  • Specimen collection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies. / Vogtmann, Emily; Chen, Jun; Amir, Amnon; Shi, Jianxin; Abnet, Christian C.; Nelson, Heidi; Knight, Rob; Chia, Nicholas D; Sinha, Rashmi.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 185, No. 2, 15.01.2017, p. 115-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vogtmann, Emily ; Chen, Jun ; Amir, Amnon ; Shi, Jianxin ; Abnet, Christian C. ; Nelson, Heidi ; Knight, Rob ; Chia, Nicholas D ; Sinha, Rashmi. / Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 2017 ; Vol. 185, No. 2. pp. 115-123.
@article{ee6059172e1a49b18632ab7970c233eb,
title = "Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies",
abstract = "Prospective cohort studies are needed to assess the relationship between the fecal microbiome and human health and disease. To evaluate fecal collection methods, we determined technical reproducibility, stability at ambient temperature, and accuracy of 5 fecal collection methods (no additive, 95{\%} ethanol, RNAlater Stabilization Solution, fecal occult blood test cards, and fecal immunochemical test tubes). Fifty-two healthy volunteers provided fecal samples at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, in 2014. One set from each sample collection method was frozen immediately, and a second set was incubated at room temperature for 96 hours and then frozen. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the relative abundance of 3 phyla, 2 alpha diversity metrics, and 4 beta diversity metrics. Technical reproducibility was high, with ICCs for duplicate fecal samples between 0.64 and 1.00. Stability for most methods was generally high, although the ICCs were below 0.60 for 95{\%} ethanol in metrics that were more sensitive to relative abundance. When compared with fecal samples that were frozen immediately, the ICCs were below 0.60 for the metrics that were sensitive to relative abundance; however, the remaining 2 alpha diversity and 3 beta diversitymetrics were all relatively accurate, with ICCs above 0.60. In conclusion, all fecal sample collection methods appear relatively reproducible, stable, and accurate. Future studies could use these collection methods for microbiome analyses.",
keywords = "Feces, Microbiota, Specimen collection",
author = "Emily Vogtmann and Jun Chen and Amnon Amir and Jianxin Shi and Abnet, {Christian C.} and Heidi Nelson and Rob Knight and Chia, {Nicholas D} and Rashmi Sinha",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kww177",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "185",
pages = "115--123",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies

AU - Vogtmann, Emily

AU - Chen, Jun

AU - Amir, Amnon

AU - Shi, Jianxin

AU - Abnet, Christian C.

AU - Nelson, Heidi

AU - Knight, Rob

AU - Chia, Nicholas D

AU - Sinha, Rashmi

PY - 2017/1/15

Y1 - 2017/1/15

N2 - Prospective cohort studies are needed to assess the relationship between the fecal microbiome and human health and disease. To evaluate fecal collection methods, we determined technical reproducibility, stability at ambient temperature, and accuracy of 5 fecal collection methods (no additive, 95% ethanol, RNAlater Stabilization Solution, fecal occult blood test cards, and fecal immunochemical test tubes). Fifty-two healthy volunteers provided fecal samples at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, in 2014. One set from each sample collection method was frozen immediately, and a second set was incubated at room temperature for 96 hours and then frozen. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the relative abundance of 3 phyla, 2 alpha diversity metrics, and 4 beta diversity metrics. Technical reproducibility was high, with ICCs for duplicate fecal samples between 0.64 and 1.00. Stability for most methods was generally high, although the ICCs were below 0.60 for 95% ethanol in metrics that were more sensitive to relative abundance. When compared with fecal samples that were frozen immediately, the ICCs were below 0.60 for the metrics that were sensitive to relative abundance; however, the remaining 2 alpha diversity and 3 beta diversitymetrics were all relatively accurate, with ICCs above 0.60. In conclusion, all fecal sample collection methods appear relatively reproducible, stable, and accurate. Future studies could use these collection methods for microbiome analyses.

AB - Prospective cohort studies are needed to assess the relationship between the fecal microbiome and human health and disease. To evaluate fecal collection methods, we determined technical reproducibility, stability at ambient temperature, and accuracy of 5 fecal collection methods (no additive, 95% ethanol, RNAlater Stabilization Solution, fecal occult blood test cards, and fecal immunochemical test tubes). Fifty-two healthy volunteers provided fecal samples at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, in 2014. One set from each sample collection method was frozen immediately, and a second set was incubated at room temperature for 96 hours and then frozen. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the relative abundance of 3 phyla, 2 alpha diversity metrics, and 4 beta diversity metrics. Technical reproducibility was high, with ICCs for duplicate fecal samples between 0.64 and 1.00. Stability for most methods was generally high, although the ICCs were below 0.60 for 95% ethanol in metrics that were more sensitive to relative abundance. When compared with fecal samples that were frozen immediately, the ICCs were below 0.60 for the metrics that were sensitive to relative abundance; however, the remaining 2 alpha diversity and 3 beta diversitymetrics were all relatively accurate, with ICCs above 0.60. In conclusion, all fecal sample collection methods appear relatively reproducible, stable, and accurate. Future studies could use these collection methods for microbiome analyses.

KW - Feces

KW - Microbiota

KW - Specimen collection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018311014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018311014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kww177

DO - 10.1093/aje/kww177

M3 - Article

C2 - 27986704

AN - SCOPUS:85018311014

VL - 185

SP - 115

EP - 123

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 2

ER -