Comparison of carbon dioxide laser-Assisted versus stapler-Assisted endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy

Taylor R. Pollei, Michael L. Hinni, Richard E Hayden, David G Lott, Matthew B. Mors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: We directly compared endoscopic carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and stapler treatment methods for both cricopharyngeal hypertrophy (CPH) and Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective chart review of 153 patients who underwent either CO2 laser- assisted or stapler-assisted endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM). Results: Isolated CPH was more likely to be treated with the CO2 laser than by stapler techniques. The ZD pouch size decreased significantly after surgery in both laser (p = 0.04) and stapler (p = 0.008) groups. The average duration of the procedure for CPM was longer for the laser than for the stapler (p = 0.01). Both techniques were successful when used in revision procedures. The overall complication rates were not statistically significantly different. Laser surgery trended toward a higher rate of major complications (2.4% versus 0%). Symptomatic recurrence was more likely after stapler surgery (p = 0.002). The rates of revision surgery were similar in the two groups (3.3% for laser and 4.3% for stapler). Conclusions: In the treatment of isolated CPH or ZD, stapler-assisted endoscopic surgery results in a shorter operative time, whereas laser-assisted CPM results in a decreased incidence of symptomatic recurrence. All rights reserved

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)568-574
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume122
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Gas Lasers
Zenker Diverticulum
Lasers
Hypertrophy
Recurrence
Laser Therapy
Operative Time
Reoperation
Incidence
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Carbon dioxide laser
  • Cricopharyngeus
  • Endoscopy
  • Hypertrophy
  • Surgical stapler
  • Zenker's diverticulum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Comparison of carbon dioxide laser-Assisted versus stapler-Assisted endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy. / Pollei, Taylor R.; Hinni, Michael L.; Hayden, Richard E; Lott, David G; Mors, Matthew B.

In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Vol. 122, No. 9, 09.2013, p. 568-574.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f63952521fba461e8bb05d960b0885cb,
title = "Comparison of carbon dioxide laser-Assisted versus stapler-Assisted endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy",
abstract = "Objectives: We directly compared endoscopic carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and stapler treatment methods for both cricopharyngeal hypertrophy (CPH) and Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective chart review of 153 patients who underwent either CO2 laser- assisted or stapler-assisted endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM). Results: Isolated CPH was more likely to be treated with the CO2 laser than by stapler techniques. The ZD pouch size decreased significantly after surgery in both laser (p = 0.04) and stapler (p = 0.008) groups. The average duration of the procedure for CPM was longer for the laser than for the stapler (p = 0.01). Both techniques were successful when used in revision procedures. The overall complication rates were not statistically significantly different. Laser surgery trended toward a higher rate of major complications (2.4{\%} versus 0{\%}). Symptomatic recurrence was more likely after stapler surgery (p = 0.002). The rates of revision surgery were similar in the two groups (3.3{\%} for laser and 4.3{\%} for stapler). Conclusions: In the treatment of isolated CPH or ZD, stapler-assisted endoscopic surgery results in a shorter operative time, whereas laser-assisted CPM results in a decreased incidence of symptomatic recurrence. All rights reserved",
keywords = "Carbon dioxide laser, Cricopharyngeus, Endoscopy, Hypertrophy, Surgical stapler, Zenker's diverticulum",
author = "Pollei, {Taylor R.} and Hinni, {Michael L.} and Hayden, {Richard E} and Lott, {David G} and Mors, {Matthew B.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "568--574",
journal = "Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology",
issn = "0003-4894",
publisher = "Annals Publishing Company",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of carbon dioxide laser-Assisted versus stapler-Assisted endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy

AU - Pollei, Taylor R.

AU - Hinni, Michael L.

AU - Hayden, Richard E

AU - Lott, David G

AU - Mors, Matthew B.

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Objectives: We directly compared endoscopic carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and stapler treatment methods for both cricopharyngeal hypertrophy (CPH) and Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective chart review of 153 patients who underwent either CO2 laser- assisted or stapler-assisted endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM). Results: Isolated CPH was more likely to be treated with the CO2 laser than by stapler techniques. The ZD pouch size decreased significantly after surgery in both laser (p = 0.04) and stapler (p = 0.008) groups. The average duration of the procedure for CPM was longer for the laser than for the stapler (p = 0.01). Both techniques were successful when used in revision procedures. The overall complication rates were not statistically significantly different. Laser surgery trended toward a higher rate of major complications (2.4% versus 0%). Symptomatic recurrence was more likely after stapler surgery (p = 0.002). The rates of revision surgery were similar in the two groups (3.3% for laser and 4.3% for stapler). Conclusions: In the treatment of isolated CPH or ZD, stapler-assisted endoscopic surgery results in a shorter operative time, whereas laser-assisted CPM results in a decreased incidence of symptomatic recurrence. All rights reserved

AB - Objectives: We directly compared endoscopic carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and stapler treatment methods for both cricopharyngeal hypertrophy (CPH) and Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective chart review of 153 patients who underwent either CO2 laser- assisted or stapler-assisted endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM). Results: Isolated CPH was more likely to be treated with the CO2 laser than by stapler techniques. The ZD pouch size decreased significantly after surgery in both laser (p = 0.04) and stapler (p = 0.008) groups. The average duration of the procedure for CPM was longer for the laser than for the stapler (p = 0.01). Both techniques were successful when used in revision procedures. The overall complication rates were not statistically significantly different. Laser surgery trended toward a higher rate of major complications (2.4% versus 0%). Symptomatic recurrence was more likely after stapler surgery (p = 0.002). The rates of revision surgery were similar in the two groups (3.3% for laser and 4.3% for stapler). Conclusions: In the treatment of isolated CPH or ZD, stapler-assisted endoscopic surgery results in a shorter operative time, whereas laser-assisted CPM results in a decreased incidence of symptomatic recurrence. All rights reserved

KW - Carbon dioxide laser

KW - Cricopharyngeus

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Hypertrophy

KW - Surgical stapler

KW - Zenker's diverticulum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883769051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883769051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 122

SP - 568

EP - 574

JO - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

JF - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

SN - 0003-4894

IS - 9

ER -