Comparison of augmentation index derived from multiple devices

Mandeep Dhindsa, Jill N. Barnes, Allison E. DeVan, Jun Sugawara, Hirofumi Tanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

One of the most commonly evaluated features of the arterial pressure waveforms is augmentation index (AI). Multiple devices have been developed and marketed that measure AI at peripheral arteries. Currently, it is not known if and how these measures of AI are related. Aortic and radial AI (using SphygmoCor), radial AI (Omron), and finger AI (Itamar) were measured in 40 apparently healthy subjects. All the AI values were correlated with each other with Pearson r-values ranging from 0.78 to 0.94. The coefficients of variation ranged from 3.4 to 20.0%. We concluded that even though the absolute values derived by each technique were different, there were high and significant correlations between AI values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-114
Number of pages3
JournalArtery Research
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Applanation tonometry
  • Arterial stiffness
  • Arterial wave reflection
  • Augmentation index
  • Vascular device

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Dhindsa, M., Barnes, J. N., DeVan, A. E., Sugawara, J., & Tanaka, H. (2011). Comparison of augmentation index derived from multiple devices. Artery Research, 5(3), 112-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.06.002