Comparing spiking and slow wave activity from invasive electroencephalography in patients with and without seizures

Brian Nils Lundstrom, Christian Meisel, Jamie Van Gompel, Squire Matthew Stead, Gregory Alan Worrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To develop quantitative measures for estimating seizure probability, we examine intracranial EEG data from patient groups with three qualitative seizure probabilities: patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy (high), these patients during cortical stimulation (intermediate), and patients who have no history of seizures (low). Methods: Patients with focal epilepsy were implanted with subdural electrodes during presurgical evaluation. Patients without seizures were implanted during treatment with motor cortex stimulation for atypical facial pain. Results: The rate and amplitude of spikes correlate with qualitative seizure probability across patient groups and with proximity to the seizure onset zone in focal epilepsy patients. Spikes occur earlier during the negative oscillation of underlying slow activity (0.5–2 Hz) when seizure probability is increased. Similarly, coupling between slow and fast activity is increased. Conclusions: There is likely a continuum of sharply contoured activity between non-epileptiform and epileptiform. Characteristics of spiking and how spikes relate to slow activity can be combined to predict seizure onset zones. Significance: Intracranial EEG data from patients without seizures represent a unique comparison group and highlight changes seen in spiking and slow wave activity with increased seizure probability. Slow wave activity and related physiology are an important potential biomarker for estimating seizure probability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)909-919
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume129
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Electroencephalography
Seizures
Partial Epilepsy
Facial Pain
Motor Cortex
Electrodes
Biomarkers

Keywords

  • EEG
  • Epilepsy monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Comparing spiking and slow wave activity from invasive electroencephalography in patients with and without seizures. / Lundstrom, Brian Nils; Meisel, Christian; Van Gompel, Jamie; Stead, Squire Matthew; Worrell, Gregory Alan.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 129, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 909-919.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6dfffd72943f4eefa0fd90693fdeda1b,
title = "Comparing spiking and slow wave activity from invasive electroencephalography in patients with and without seizures",
abstract = "Objectives: To develop quantitative measures for estimating seizure probability, we examine intracranial EEG data from patient groups with three qualitative seizure probabilities: patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy (high), these patients during cortical stimulation (intermediate), and patients who have no history of seizures (low). Methods: Patients with focal epilepsy were implanted with subdural electrodes during presurgical evaluation. Patients without seizures were implanted during treatment with motor cortex stimulation for atypical facial pain. Results: The rate and amplitude of spikes correlate with qualitative seizure probability across patient groups and with proximity to the seizure onset zone in focal epilepsy patients. Spikes occur earlier during the negative oscillation of underlying slow activity (0.5–2 Hz) when seizure probability is increased. Similarly, coupling between slow and fast activity is increased. Conclusions: There is likely a continuum of sharply contoured activity between non-epileptiform and epileptiform. Characteristics of spiking and how spikes relate to slow activity can be combined to predict seizure onset zones. Significance: Intracranial EEG data from patients without seizures represent a unique comparison group and highlight changes seen in spiking and slow wave activity with increased seizure probability. Slow wave activity and related physiology are an important potential biomarker for estimating seizure probability.",
keywords = "EEG, Epilepsy monitoring",
author = "Lundstrom, {Brian Nils} and Christian Meisel and {Van Gompel}, Jamie and Stead, {Squire Matthew} and Worrell, {Gregory Alan}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "909--919",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing spiking and slow wave activity from invasive electroencephalography in patients with and without seizures

AU - Lundstrom, Brian Nils

AU - Meisel, Christian

AU - Van Gompel, Jamie

AU - Stead, Squire Matthew

AU - Worrell, Gregory Alan

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Objectives: To develop quantitative measures for estimating seizure probability, we examine intracranial EEG data from patient groups with three qualitative seizure probabilities: patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy (high), these patients during cortical stimulation (intermediate), and patients who have no history of seizures (low). Methods: Patients with focal epilepsy were implanted with subdural electrodes during presurgical evaluation. Patients without seizures were implanted during treatment with motor cortex stimulation for atypical facial pain. Results: The rate and amplitude of spikes correlate with qualitative seizure probability across patient groups and with proximity to the seizure onset zone in focal epilepsy patients. Spikes occur earlier during the negative oscillation of underlying slow activity (0.5–2 Hz) when seizure probability is increased. Similarly, coupling between slow and fast activity is increased. Conclusions: There is likely a continuum of sharply contoured activity between non-epileptiform and epileptiform. Characteristics of spiking and how spikes relate to slow activity can be combined to predict seizure onset zones. Significance: Intracranial EEG data from patients without seizures represent a unique comparison group and highlight changes seen in spiking and slow wave activity with increased seizure probability. Slow wave activity and related physiology are an important potential biomarker for estimating seizure probability.

AB - Objectives: To develop quantitative measures for estimating seizure probability, we examine intracranial EEG data from patient groups with three qualitative seizure probabilities: patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy (high), these patients during cortical stimulation (intermediate), and patients who have no history of seizures (low). Methods: Patients with focal epilepsy were implanted with subdural electrodes during presurgical evaluation. Patients without seizures were implanted during treatment with motor cortex stimulation for atypical facial pain. Results: The rate and amplitude of spikes correlate with qualitative seizure probability across patient groups and with proximity to the seizure onset zone in focal epilepsy patients. Spikes occur earlier during the negative oscillation of underlying slow activity (0.5–2 Hz) when seizure probability is increased. Similarly, coupling between slow and fast activity is increased. Conclusions: There is likely a continuum of sharply contoured activity between non-epileptiform and epileptiform. Characteristics of spiking and how spikes relate to slow activity can be combined to predict seizure onset zones. Significance: Intracranial EEG data from patients without seizures represent a unique comparison group and highlight changes seen in spiking and slow wave activity with increased seizure probability. Slow wave activity and related physiology are an important potential biomarker for estimating seizure probability.

KW - EEG

KW - Epilepsy monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043587374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043587374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 29550651

AN - SCOPUS:85043587374

VL - 129

SP - 909

EP - 919

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 5

ER -